This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Nitrogen Removal from a Urine-Soap Wastewater Using a Bioprocessor System: Process Monitoring and Control
Technical Paper
2002-01-2353
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
A detailed study was conducted on nitrification using a bench top bioprocessor system proposed for water recycling of a urine-soap wastewater expected to be generated by crewmembers on International Space Station (ISS) or similar long-term space missions. The bioprocessor system consisted of two packed bed biofilm reactors; one anoxic reactor used for denitrification and one aerobic reactor used for nitrification. lnfluent wastewater was a mixture of dilute NASA whole body soap (2,300 mg/L) and urea (500 mg/L as organic nitrogen). During two months of steady-state operation, average chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was greater than 95%, and average total nitrogen removal was 70%. We observed that high levels of nitrite consistently accumulated in the aerobic (nitrifying) reactor effluent, indicating incomplete nitrification as the typical end product of the reaction would be nitrate. Average levels of nitrite (NO2−) and nitrate (NO3−) observed in the aerobic reactor were 21 and 28 mg-N/L, respectively. Incomplete nitrification, or nitrite accumulation, may be advantageous when coupled with the anoxic denitrification process, during which nitrite are reduced to N2 gas. Aeration requirements for nitrification of the urea waste would be reduced, as are organic carbon requirements for denitrification. Furthermore, relying on a partial biological reaction would reduce the residence time and reactor volume required for wastewater processing.
Reactor conditions associated with incomplete nitrification were investigated, especially pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), for purposes of process monitoring and control. Both pH and ORP were strongly correlated (R2 = 0.80) with the ratio of NO2− to total oxidized nitrogen species (NO3− + NO2−) in the aerobic reactor effluent. More than 50% of the oxidized nitrogen was NO2− when aerobic reactor pH ranged from 6.3 to 7.8 and ORP ranged from +0.01 to +0.17 volts. The ORP values observed were lower than those found in highly aerobic systems usually associated with biological nitrification, in spite of the fact that the observed dissolved oxygen concentration was greater than 6 mg/L. A further set of experiments, focusing on the nitrification step, were set up to improve nitrification efficiency and induce partial nitrification using pH control (above 7.7) and lowering oxygen supply to control ORP. The use of online measurements as indicators of process performance was further investigated. Nitrite accumulation was initially observed during reactor startup and steadily decreased as the reactors ran. Reducing the oxygen supply caused some nitrite accumulation but it was not sustained. Ammonia conversion was much higher in the reactor with pH control than the reactor without pH control. Both pH and ORP proved to be good indicators of process performance. ORP was correlated to the fraction of nitrogen converted to total oxidized nitrogen species (NO,), with an R value of 0.7 in both reactors.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Sharvelle, S., Silverstein, J., Klaus, D., and Supra, L., "Nitrogen Removal from a Urine-Soap Wastewater Using a Bioprocessor System: Process Monitoring and Control," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2353, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2353.Also In
References
- Anthonisen, A.C. Loehr R.C. Prakasam T.B.S. Srinath E.G. 1976 “Inhibition of Nitrification by Ammonia and Nitrous Acid” J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed. 48 5 835 852
- Blanc, F.C. Molof A.H. 1973 “Electrode Potential Monitoring and Electrolytic Control in Anaerobic Digestion.” J. Water Pollution Control Fed. 60 3 351 361
- Borchardt, J.A. 1970 “Anaerobic Phase Separation by Dialysis Technique.” Adv. Chem. Ser 105 108 125
- Burton, S.A.Q. Prosser J.I. 2001 “Autotrophic ammonia Oxidation at Low pH through Urea Hydrolysis.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67 7 2952 2957
- Charpentier, J. Martin G. Wacheux H. Gilles P. 1998 “ORP Regulation and Activated Sludge: 15 Years of Experience.” Water Science Technology 38 3 197 208
- Charpentier, J. Godart H. martin G. Mogno Y. 1989 “Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) Regulations a Way to Optimize Aeration and C, N, and P Removal: Experimental Basis and Various Full-Scale Examples.” Water Science Technology 21 1209 1 223
- De Boer, W. Gunnewiek P.J.A. Klein Toelstra S.R. Laanbrock H.J. 1989 “Two types of chemolithotrophic nitrification in acid heathland humus.” P/ant Soil 119 229 235
- DallBaumann, L. 1999 personal communication Honeywell Corp.
- Figueroa, Linda A. Silverstein JoAnn 1992 “The effect of Particulate Organic Matter on Biofilm Nitrification” Water Environment Research 64 5 728 733
- Eaton, Andrew D. Clesceri Lenore S. Greengerg Arnold E. 1995 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 79th
- Finger, Barry W. Supra Laura N. DallBauman Liese Pickering Karen D. SAE Paper 1999-01-1 947 International Conference on Environmental Systems
- Glass, C Silverstein J. Oh J. 1997 “Inhibition of Denitrification in Activated Sludge by Nitrite” Water Environment Research 69 6 1086 1093
- Hach Co., Loveland CO 1989 Water Analysis Handbook.
- Hellinga, C Schellen A.A.J.C. Mulder J.W. van Loosdrecht M.C.M Heijnen J.J. 1998 “The SHARON process: an innovative method for nitrogen removal from ammonium-rich waste water.” Wat. Sci. Tech . 37 135 142
- Honeywell Corp. 2000 Biological Wastewater Processor Experiment Definition Final Report
- Isaacs, S. Mah T. Maneshin S.K. 1998 “Automatic Monitoring of Denitrification Rates and Capacities in Activated Sludge Processes Using Fluorescence or Redox Potential.” Water Science Technology 37 12 121 129
- Koch, F.A. Oldham W.K. 1985 “ Oxidation -Reduction Potential - A Tool for Monitoring, Control and Optimization of Biological Nutrient Removal Systems.” Wat. Sci . Tech. 17 259 281
- Peddle, C.C. Mavinic D.S. Jenkins C.J. 1989 “Use of ORP for Monitoring and Control of Aerobic Sludge Digestion.” J. Environ. Eng. (ASCE) 116 3 461 471
- Prinčič, A. Mahne I Megušr F. Paul E.A. Tiedge J.M. 1998 “Effects of pH and Oxygen and Ammonium Concentrations on the Community Structure of Nitrifying Bacteria from Wastewater.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64 10 3584 3590
- Plisson-Saune, S. Capdeville B. Mauret M. Deguin A. Baptiste P. 1996 “Real-Time Control of Nitrogen Removal Using Three ORP Bending Points: Signification, Control Strategy and Results.” Water Science Technology 33 1 275 280
- Stein, L.Y. Arp D.J. 1998 “Loss of Ammonia Monooxygenase Activity in Nitrosomonas europaea upon Exposure to Nitrite,” Applied Environmental Microbiology 64 10 4098 4102
- Sukuki, I. Dular U. Kwok S.C. 1974 “Ammonia or ammonium ions as a substrate for oxidation by Nitrosomonas europaea cells and extracts” J. Bacteriol., 120 556 558
- Supra, Laura N. Finger Barry W. Reddig Mike A. MacKnight Allen K. Silverstein JoAnn Klaus David M. Urban James E. Strayer Dick F. “Biological Wastewater Processor Experiment Definition” SAE Paper 2000-01-2468 , 30th International Conference on Environmental Systems Toulouse, France July 1 o-1 3 2000
- Supra, Laura N. Reddig Mike A. Finger Barry W. Zhou S. James DallBaumann Liese A. “ Membrane -Based Bioprocessor for Life Support Wastewater Reclamation” SAE Paper 981611 28th International Conference on Environmental Systems Danvers, Massachusetts July 13-l 6 1998
- Turk, O. Mavinic D.S. 1989 Stability of Nitrite Build-up in an Activated Sludge System” Journal Water Pollution Control Federation 16 8 1440 1448
- Turk, O. Mavinic D.S. 1986 “Preliminary Assessment of a Shortcut in Nitrogen Removal from W astewater ” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 12 600 604
- Van Dongen, Udo Jetten Mike S.M. van Loodsrecht Marck CM. 2000 “The Sharon®-Anammox® Process for Treatment of Ammonium Rich Wastewater” Proc. IWA Conf . Wastewater and EU-Nutrient Guidelines Amsterdam 190 I 97
- Zhou, Shaojun James Supra Laura 2001 Patent Number US 6,235,196 B1 “Biological Wastewater Treatment System”