This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparing Estimates of Fuel Economy Improvement Via Fuel-Cell Powertrains
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published June 03, 2002 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: Future Car Congress
Several studies, conducted from 1997 to 2001, have employed vehicle and powertrain simulation models to estimate fuel economy gains for a variety of fuel-cell powertrains. Many of those studies have attempted to control for the comparability of performance between conventional and fuel-cell vehicles (FCVs), but different sets of performance goals and simulation models have been used. This paper reviews the estimates of fuel economy gain (in mpg) vs. varying measures of performance change for a set of those studies. We examine some of the potential causes for the variability of these estimates - fuel used, powertrain hybridization, vehicle raw energy requirements (load), and variations in analysts' assumptions/estimates - when substituting several types of fuel-cell powertrains.
Our study includes development of a database and detailed examination of the relationships among powertrain and vehicle characteristics and fuel economy gain estimates for the selected studies. We developed simple equations by powertrain type to systematically examine the causes of variation in mpg gain among those conventional/FCV pairs controlled to have the same peak kW per kg of vehicle test weight (a surrogate for acceleration capability).
CitationSantini, D., Vyas, A., Kumar, R., and Anderson, J., "Comparing Estimates of Fuel Economy Improvement Via Fuel-Cell Powertrains," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1947, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-1947.
- Weiss et al. 2000 On the Road in 2020: A Life-Cycle Analysis of New Automobile Technologies MIT Energy Laboratory Report No. MIT EL 00-003 Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Mass. Oct.
- General Motors Corp. et al. 2001 Well-to-Wheel Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems - North American Analysis Executive Summary Report Argonne National Laboratory's Transportation Technology Research and Development Center http://www.transportation.anl.gov/
- Wang, Michael “Fuel Choices for Fuel Cell Vehicles: Well-to-Wheel Energy and Emissions Impacts,” Future Car Congress 2002 Arlington, Va. June 3-5 2002
- Santini, D.J. Vyas A.D. Anderson J.L. “Fuel Economy Improvement via Hybridization vs. Vehicle Performance Level,” Future Car Congress 2002 paper 02FCC-27 Arlington, Va. June 3-5 2002
- Graham, R. et al. 2001 Comparing the Benefits and Impacts of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Options July 2000 Electric Power Research Institute Palo Alto, Calif.
- Plotkin, S. et al. 2001 Hybrid Vehicle Technology Assessment: Methodology, Analytical Issues, and Interim Results Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/ESD/02-2 Argonne, III.
- Santini, D. Vyas A Anderson J.L. An F. 2001 “Estimating Trade-Offs along the Path to the PNGV 3X Goal,” Transportation Research Board 80 th Annual Meeting, Paper 01-3222 Transportation Research Board Washington, D.C. Jan. 7-11
- An, F. Stodolsky F. Santini D. 1999 “Hybrid Options for Light-Duty Vehicles,” SAE paper 1999-01-2929 Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Fuel Cell Technology Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Penn. Future Transportation Technology Conference Costa Mesa, Calif. Aug.
- Santini, D.J. et al. 2002 “Hybridizing with Engine Downsizing,” 81 st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington, D.C. Jan. 13-17
- Lave, L.B. MacLean H.L. 2001 “Are Hybrid Vehicles Worth It?” IEEE Spectrum March 47 50
- Thomas, C.E. James B.D. Lomax F.D. Kuhn I.F. 1998 Integrated Analysis of Hydrogen Passenger Vehicle Transportation Pathways Directed technologies, Inc. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colo. March
- Thomas, C.E. 1999 PNGV-Class Vehicle Analysis:Task 3 Final Report Directed Technologies, Inc. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colo. March
- Ford Motor Company Research Laboratory 2000 Direct-Hydrogen-Fueled Proton Exchange Membrane-Fuel Cell System for Transportation Applications: Final Technical Report U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Transportation Technologies Dearborn, Mich. Dec.
- Kumar, R. Doss E.D. Ahluwalia R. Geyer H.K. 2000 “Performance Requirements for a Gasoline-Fueled Automotive Fuel Cell System to Meet the PNGV Target of 80 Miles Per Gallon.”
- Wipke, K. Markel T. Nelson D. 2001 “Optimizing Energy Management Strategy and Degree of Hybridization for a Hydrogen Fuel-Cell SUV,” 18 th Electric Vehicle Symposium Berlin, Germany Oct. 20-24
- Markel T. 2001 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Nov. 2 5
- Wipke, K. Cuddy M. Burch S. 1999 “ADVISOR 2.1: A User-Friendly Advanced Powertrain Simulation Using a Combined BackWard/Forward Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology Hybrid and Electric Vehicles Columbus, Ohio Aug.
- Jenkins, S. 2001 “R&D 100 Award-Winning Gasoline Reformer Is a Catalyst For Change,” Logos Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, III. 4 7