This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
PEM Fuel Cell Air Management Efficiency at Part Load
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published June 03, 2002 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: Future Car Congress
Proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells are considered to be one of the best alternative power sources for automobiles. For this application, high power and high power density are required. Pressurizing the fuel cell system gives both higher efficiency and higher power density, but that pressure costs a percentage of the fuel cell output power. The compressor used to elevate the pressure has a direct effect on the system efficiency and water balance characteristics, especially at low load. Compressors being developed for fuel cell applications are examined to determine their effect on a fuel cell system. Two compressor technologies are discussed; a positive displacement twin-screw compressor and a turbocompressor, along with their effects on overall system characteristics and efficiency. The turbocompressor proves to be a superior machine in terms of efficiency, and therefore offers the most promising effect on system efficiency of the two compressors. The twin-screw compressor, on the other hand, offers more flexible pressure ratio and better water balance characteristics at low fuel cell loads, which is an important factor with PEM fuel cell systems. These results show the importance of determining the operating range of the system in the choice of a compressor for a fuel cell system.
|Technical Paper||A Comparison of Two Fuel Cell Air Compression Systems at Low Load|
|Journal Article||Air Compressors for Fuel Cell Vehicles: An Systematic Review|
|Technical Paper||A Fuel-Cell Electric Vehicle with Cracking and Electrolysis of Ammonia|
CitationKulp, G., Gurski, S., and Nelson, D., "PEM Fuel Cell Air Management Efficiency at Part Load," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1912, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-1912.
- Sadler, M. Stapleton A.J. Heath R.P.G. Jackson N.S. “Application of Modeling Techniques to the Design and Development of Fuel Cell Vehicle Systems,” SAE Paper 2001-01-0542 SAE International Warrendale, PA 2001
- Cunningham, Joshua M. Hoffman Myron A. Friedman David J. “A Comparison of High-Pressure and Low-Pressure Operation of PEM Fuel Cell Systems,” SAE Paper 2001-01-0538 SAE International Warrendale, PA 2001
- Pischinger, S. Schönfelder C. Bornscheuer W. Kindl H. Wiartalla A. “Integrated Air Supply and Humidification Concepts for Fuel Cell Systems,” SAE Paper 2001-01-0233 SAE International Warrendale, PA 2001
- Roan, V.P. Creveling H.F. Garris C.A. Wilson B.D. “Air System Technology Programs Review Panel: Fuel Cell CEM - Preliminary Findings,” ANL Air Management Workshop Oct. 2000
- Kulp G. Nelson D.J. 2001 “A Comparison of Two Fuel Cell Air Compression Systems at Low Load” SAE paper 2001-01-2547 in Fuel Cells and Alternative Fuels/Energy Systems Proceedings of the 2001 SAE Future Transportation Technology Conference Costa Mesa, Ca. 81 90
- Kulp G. 2001 “A Comparison of Two Air Compressors for PEM Fuel Cell Systems,” Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA Dec. 2001 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-01072002-142434/
- Davis P. 2002 “Air Management for Fuel Cell Systems: Assessment and New Activities,” Proceedings of the 2002 Future Car Congress June 3-5 Arlington, VA SAE