This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Case Study on the Response Surface Method Applied to the Optimization of the Dynamical Behavior of Vehicles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 05, 2001 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This paper describes the application of statistical techniques related to the condensation of computational models so that gradient based optimization procedures can be used more effectively. The adoption of these techniques is encouraged by the possibility of an important reduction in time and cost associated to the vehicle development process. A sophisticated computational model of a Mini-baja vehicle is defined in the virtual environment by means of CAD/CAE software, intending to provide the major information related to the study of its dynamic behaviour and to define the statistical surrogates (approximate models). The creation of the computational model deals with the determination of physical and geometric properties, and is fed by stiffness and damping parameters obtained through experimental procedures. The response surface methodology (RSM) uses values obtained from simulations of the original multi-body model, aiming at establishing polynomial models which approximate the response of interest. These responses are represented by algebraic functions which are able to evaluate some of the main aspects of vehicle dynamics, such as: comfort, stability and safety. Finally, optimization results obtained from both the original (multi-body) and the approximate (obtained by means of the response surface method) models are compared, taking into account the difference between the number of objective function evaluations necessary in the first approach, and the number of computational experiments performed to obtain the response surface model.
CitationLeal, M., Borges, J., and Butkewitsch, S., "A Case Study on the Response Surface Method Applied to the Optimization of the Dynamical Behavior of Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3850, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-3850.
- BORGES, J.A.F., 1999, “Dinâmica de Veículos Articulados: Simulação Computacional, Otimização e Ensaios Experimentais”; Tese de Doutorado; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; 213 p.
- BORGES, J.A.F.; STEFFEN V. JR.,; SCHARDIJN, E.C.; ARGENTINO, M.A., 1999, “Vehicle Dynamics: Modeling and Experimental Testing”; Proceedings of the PACAM VI / DINAME - Sixty Pan American Congress of Applied Mechanics; p. 1499-1502.
- BORGES, J.A.F.; STEFFEN V. JR.,; SCHARDIJN, E.C.; ARGENTINO, M.A., 1996, “On The Optimization of Vehicle Dynamics”; Proceedings of the ISMA 21; Leuven; Belgium; Vol.3; pp. 1863-1872.
- RILL, G. and ZAMPIEIRI, D.E., 1997, “Improvement of Ride Comfort and Ride Safety por Using Nonlinear Spring and Damping Elements”; Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Dynamic Problems in Mechanics - DINAME 97; Angra dos Reis; Rio de Janeiro; Brazil; pp. 220-222.
- LEAL, M. F.,2001, “Otimização do Comportamento Dinâmico de Veículos usando Superfícies de Resposta”, Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; 101 p.
- BORGES, J.A.F., 1995, “Modelagem Tridimensional Não Linear de Veículos Articulados Pesados do Tipo Cavalo Mecânico Carreta”; Dissertação de Mestrado; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; 190 p.
- SIMPSON, T.W., MAUERY, T.M., KORTE, J.J. and MISTREE, F., 1998, “Comparison of Response Surface and Kriging Models for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization”; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Paper AIAA-98-4755; 11 p.
- MONTGOMERY, D. C., 1996, “Design and Analysis of Experiments”, John Willey & Sons, 4th Edition.
- BALABANOV, V.,1998, “DOE Functional Module. Theory and Implementation”, VRAND INC.; 39 p.
- SCHIMIDT, S. and CASE, K., 1999, “Communicating Design of Experiments (DOE) to Non-statisticians”; URL:www.airacad.com/comdoe.htm; 10 p.
- BOX, G. E. P.; DRAPER, N. R., 1986, “Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces”; John Willey & Sons.
- GIUNTA, A.A. and WATSON, L.T., 1998, “Comparison of Approximation Modeling Techniques: Polynomial versus Interpolating Models”; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Paper AIAA-98-4758; 13 p.
- VANDERPLAATS, G. N., 1998, “Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design”; Vanderplaats Research and Development Inc.; 2nd Edition.
- MILLIKEN W. F.; MILLIKEN D. L., 1995, “Race Car Vehicle Dynamics”; ISBN 1-56091-526-9.