This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Life Support Trade Studies Involving Plants
Technical Paper
2001-01-2362
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Plants can be grown in space to support human life, providing food, and regenerating water and air. Various groups have demonstrated that plants can support human life on the ground, and that plants can grow in space. One would suppose that plants are also able to support human life in space, though obviously it would be a good idea to demonstrate that ability before committing to a mission requiring bioregeneration. However, plant growth in space requires that we provide the necessary conditions for growth, and this might require not only providing water and fertilizer as we do in terrestrial agriculture, but also a controlled environment and lighting. This would make crops much more costly than we are accustomed to on Earth, where the majority of crops are grown outside and where natural sunlight is generally adequate. On the other hand, providing food, air, and water in space by any other means is also costly.
The real question is whether and under what conditions it is cost effective to grow plants for life support in space. There are also intangible benefits in growing crops, and these need to be considered in designing a mission, though it is difficult to assess their importance. For simplicity, this paper uses a quantitative approach, and ignores, for now, intangible benefits. Cost effectiveness can be calculated for identified products and for a given mission where factors such as mission duration, equipment design, and mission equivalencies can be specified.
Equivalent system mass (ESM) has been calculated for a number of plant products both for supply from Earth and for local production on Mars. A dimensionless number is then obtained by dividing the supply ESM by the local-production ESM. This “goodness” number will be greater than one when local production is cost-effective. Very different values of goodness are obtained according to the plant product for which the value is estimated. Thus, fresh tomatoes turn out to be worth more than dried tomatoes. This is probably realistic, as fresh tomatoes would cost more to ship, even if they could arrive in pristine condition (which, of course, is not the case). Furthermore, drying locally grown tomatoes would cost more in equipment, energy, and heat rejection, and probably in crew time, than the fresh product, so locally produced dried tomatoes would cost more per kg of usable product than fresh tomatoes.
A correction can be applied to account for benefits of water and air regeneration, based on the reduced water and air systems that are needed when plants are grown. Thus, air regeneration would not be needed if the degree of food closure exceeds about 50%. However, gas storage, air circulation, and other functions would still be needed. With water, if it is accepted that plants can be used for producing potable water (and not everybody agrees with this due to concerns over pathogens and contaminants), functions such as storage and distribution would still be needed, but water closure would be reached at about 20% food closure. For simplicity, this correction has not been applied here
Goodness is considered for a number of crops products and a number of assumptions, using a baseline of terrestrial growth-chamber productivity, Mars surface missions of variable durations, and established equivalencies.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Space Station Condensing Heat Exchanger Biofilm Formation and Control Evaluation |
Technical Paper | Condensing Heat Exchanger Microbial Growth and Control Study-Phase II |
Technical Paper | Total Organic Carbon Analyzer For ISS |
Authors
Citation
Drysdale, A., "Life Support Trade Studies Involving Plants," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-2362, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-2362.Also In
References
- Drysdale, A. E. Hanford, A. J. 1999 ALS SMAP Baseline Values and Assumptions Document
- Drysdale, A. E. Maxwell, S. Hanford, A. J. Ewert, M. K. 1999 Advanced Life Support Systems Modeling and Analysis Reference Missions Document
- Drysdale, A. E. Maxwell, S. Ewert, M. K. Hanford, A. J. 2000 Systems Analysis of Life Support for Long-Duration Missions
- Hoffman, D. I. Kaplan, D. I. 1997 The Human Exploration of Mars
- Hunter, J. B. Lin, S. Drysdale, A. E. Vodovotz, Y. 1997 Prospects for Single-Cell Oil Production in a Lunar Life Support System SAE 972365
- Jones, H. W. Levri, J. A. 2001 The Cost or Equivalent System Mass of Space Crew Time 2
- Levri, J. A. Vaccari, D. A. Drysdale, A. E. 2000 Theory and Application of the Equivalent System Mass Metric
- Olabi, A. Jackson, P. Hunter, J. Segal, M. et al 1999 Work Measurement Videotaping Technique as a Means for Estimating Food Preparation Labor Time of a Bioregenerative Diet ICES paper 1999-01-2075
- Wheeler, R. M. 1998 Bioregenerative Life Support System Testing at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center Proceedings of the International Committee for Material Circulation in Geo-Hydrosphere and its Applications Aomori, Japan July 21 – 23
- Wheeler, R. M. Mackowiak C. L. Yorio, N. C. Stutte, G. S. Ruffe, L. M. Sager, J. S. Hinkle, C. R. Knott, W. M. 2001 A Crop Handbook for Advanced Life Support Systems: Observations and Recommendations from the Kennedy Space Center Breadboard Project Jan. 2001