This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
LNG Vehicle Fuel Pressure Strategy Alternatives
Technical Paper
2001-01-1919
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) use as a heavy-duty vehicle fuel is increasing. Current generation high-horsepower natural gas engines used in trucks and buses typically require fuel supply pressures in the range 75 to 120 psig. LNG delivered to the fueling station usually has a saturation pressure of roughly 10 psig. A variety of approaches may be used to provide the required fuel pressure increase. Each approach involves a different on-vehicle fuel system design, and LNG station capabilities must accommodate vehicle fuel system requirements. This paper describes various LNG vehicle fuel system design strategies including key tradeoffs, implications on station requirements, and developmental status.
The most commonly used fuel system design receives and stores the LNG in the vehicle tank at a saturation pressure at least equal to the engine fuel supply pressure requirement. This design is relatively simple, but it requires fuel conditioning (saturation pressure and temperature increase) at the station. This increases station cost and decreases fuel density and hence vehicle range. Saturated LNG fuel systems typically include a pressure-reducing function which can increase the tank hold time for most applications.
LNG vehicle fuel systems based on non-saturated LNG theory are also being developed and tested. These seek to maintain the liquid in the fuel tank in a subcooled state (at lower temperatures and higher densities than saturated systems). This approach employs a pressure-building circuit. A key issue for pressure-building circuits, which are also used in certain saturated fuel system concepts, is the time needed to build initial pressure following refueling. Pumped systems have been used for direct-injection natural gas engines with very high fuel pressure requirements that cannot be met with practical pressure-transfer systems. Cryogenic pumps may also be used for lower pressure requirements, but there are concerns regarding their relative cost and durability for this application.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | The Effects of LNG Weathering on Fuel Composition and Vehicle Management Techniques |
Technical Paper | LNG Truck Demonstration |
Technical Paper | The DC-10 Fuel System |
Authors
Citation
Wiens, J., Powars, C., and Pope, G., "LNG Vehicle Fuel Pressure Strategy Alternatives," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-1919, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-1919.Also In
References
- Nimocks, R. “LNG Vehicle Markets and Infrastructure,” Sept. 1995
- Powars, C. Moyer, C. Lowell, D. “LNG Vehicle Technology, Economics, and Safety Assessment,” Feb. 1994
- “Liquefied Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel for Heavy-Duty Trucks: Vol. I,” Dec. 1997
- Wegrzyn, J. Litzke, W. Gurevich, M. “Natural Gas as a Fuel Option for Heavy Vehicles,” SAE 1999-01-2248 Apr. 1999
- Wegrzyn, J. Gurevich, M. “Liquefied Natural Gas for Trucks and Buses,” SAE 2000-01-2210 Apr. 2000
- Midgett, D. “Best Available Practices for LNG Fueling of Fleet Vehicles,” Feb. 1996
- Gibson, C. J. “Four Years of LNG Vehicle Experience,” Cryogenic Society of America Annual Symposium Los Angeles, California Oct. 3-5 1973
- Fischer, F. L. “Introduction of a Commercial System for Liquid Methane Vehicles,” IGT Nonpetroleum Vehicular Fuels III Arlington, Virginia Oct. 1982
- Affleck, W. Harrow, G. Mills, W. “Converting a Small Car to LNG: What Are the Problems and What Can It Do for Economy and Emissions?,” SAE 760376 1976
- Ko, Y. et al. “Research and Development of LNG Vehicle for Practical Use,” SAE 920594 Feb. 1992
- www.detroitdiesel.com/prod/pnatgas.htm
- Gebert, K. Beck, J. Barkhimer, R. Wong, H. “Strategies to Improve Combustion and Emissions Characteristics of Dual-Fuel Pilot Ignited Natural Gas Engines,” SAE 97172 1997
- www.cat-dual-fuel.com
- Miller, S. P. “LNG Usage in Two-Stroke Engines,” SAE TOPTEC LNG as a Transportation Fuel-A Progress Update Houston, Texas Jan. 1993
- Cox, G. Del Vecchio, K. Hays, W. Hiltner, J. Nagaraj, R. Emmer, C. “Development of a Direct-Injected Natural Gas Engine System for Heavy-Duty Vehicles,” Feb. 2000
- www.westport.com
- Douville, B. Ouellette, P. Touchette, A. “Performance and Emissions of a Two-Stroke Engine Fueled Using High-Pressure Direct Injection of Natural Gas,” SAE 981160 Feb. 1998
- “Westport Innovations Set to Demonstrate Natural Gas Technology on Heavy-Duty Trucks,” Diesel Progress, North American Edition March 2000
- Friend, D. G. “Thermophysical Properties of Methane,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref Data 1989 18 583 638
- Acker, G. H. Moulton, S. D. “LNG Weathering Effects-Theoretical and Empirical,” Dec. 1992
- Gibbs, J. L. Bechtold, R. L. Collison, C. E. “The Effects of LNG Weathering on Fuel Composition and Vehicle Management Techniques,” SAE 952607 Nov. 1995
- “On-Board Fuel Systems, LNG,” MVE, Inc. Bloomington, Minnesota 1996
- “Liquefied Natural Gas, Alternative Fuel of Choice,” May 1999
- Kalet, G. “Advancements in Fuel Conditioning,” Zeus LNG-Powered Heavy-Duty Transportation Conference Los Angeles, California Jan. 1996
- Hurt, J. “Onboard High-Pressure Fuel Delivery Systems,” SAE TOPTEC LNG as a Transportation Fuel-A Progress Update Houston, Texas Jan. 1993
- Bechtold, R. Gibbs, J. “The Maryland MTA Demonstration of LNG Buses,” Final Report for MTA Contract E-45-1 Oct. 1996
- Powars, C. Derbidge, T. “LNG Vehicle High-Pressure Fuel System and ‘Cold Energy’ Utilization,” March 2001
- Sanly, W. Werkmeister, L. “LNG Commercial Issues Related to Fuel Tank Design,” Zeus LNG's Energy Integrated Marketplace Conference Houston, Texas March 1997
- “Improvement in LNG Storage Tanks, Full Scale Demonstration Testing,” Cryogenic Fuels, Inc. Nov. 1999
- Wilding, B. “Natural Gas Vehicle Program, INEEL,” Zeus LNG: Prospecting Downstream Markets Conference Colorado Springs, Colorado March 23-25 1998
- Lenz, D. “Onboard Low Pressure Fuel Delivery Systems,” SAE TOPTEC LNG as a Transportation Fuel-A Progress Update Houston, Texas Jan. 1993