This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
LNG Vehicle Fuel Pressure Strategy Alternatives
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published May 07, 2001 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) use as a heavy-duty vehicle fuel is increasing. Current generation high-horsepower natural gas engines used in trucks and buses typically require fuel supply pressures in the range 75 to 120 psig. LNG delivered to the fueling station usually has a saturation pressure of roughly 10 psig. A variety of approaches may be used to provide the required fuel pressure increase. Each approach involves a different on-vehicle fuel system design, and LNG station capabilities must accommodate vehicle fuel system requirements. This paper describes various LNG vehicle fuel system design strategies including key tradeoffs, implications on station requirements, and developmental status.
The most commonly used fuel system design receives and stores the LNG in the vehicle tank at a saturation pressure at least equal to the engine fuel supply pressure requirement. This design is relatively simple, but it requires fuel conditioning (saturation pressure and temperature increase) at the station. This increases station cost and decreases fuel density and hence vehicle range. Saturated LNG fuel systems typically include a pressure-reducing function which can increase the tank hold time for most applications.
LNG vehicle fuel systems based on non-saturated LNG theory are also being developed and tested. These seek to maintain the liquid in the fuel tank in a subcooled state (at lower temperatures and higher densities than saturated systems). This approach employs a pressure-building circuit. A key issue for pressure-building circuits, which are also used in certain saturated fuel system concepts, is the time needed to build initial pressure following refueling. Pumped systems have been used for direct-injection natural gas engines with very high fuel pressure requirements that cannot be met with practical pressure-transfer systems. Cryogenic pumps may also be used for lower pressure requirements, but there are concerns regarding their relative cost and durability for this application.
|Technical Paper||The Effects of LNG Weathering on Fuel Composition and Vehicle Management Techniques|
|Technical Paper||LNG Truck Demonstration|
|Technical Paper||The DC-10 Fuel System|
CitationWiens, J., Powars, C., and Pope, G., "LNG Vehicle Fuel Pressure Strategy Alternatives," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-1919, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-1919.
SAE 2001 Transactions Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Number: V110-4 ; Published: 2002-09-15
Number: V110-4 ; Published: 2002-09-15
- Nimocks, R., “LNG Vehicle Markets and Infrastructure,” GRI-95/0423, Sept. 1995.
- Powars, C., Moyer, C., and Lowell, D., “LNG Vehicle Technology, Economics, and Safety Assessment,” GRI-94/0051, Feb. 1994.
- “Liquefied Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel for Heavy-Duty Trucks: Vol. I,” NREL/SR-540-23094, Dec. 1997.
- Wegrzyn, J., Litzke, W., and Gurevich, M., “Natural Gas as a Fuel Option for Heavy Vehicles,” SAE 1999-01-2248, Apr. 1999.
- Wegrzyn, J. and Gurevich, M., “Liquefied Natural Gas for Trucks and Buses,” SAE 2000-01-2210, Apr. 2000.
- Midgett, D., “Best Available Practices for LNG Fueling of Fleet Vehicles,” GRI-96/0180, Feb. 1996.
- Gibson, C. J., “Four Years of LNG Vehicle Experience,” presented at the Cryogenic Society of America Annual Symposium, Los Angeles, California, Oct. 3-5, 1973.
- Fischer, F. L., “Introduction of a Commercial System for Liquid Methane Vehicles,” presented at IGT Nonpetroleum Vehicular Fuels III, Arlington, Virginia, Oct. 1982.
- Affleck, W., Harrow, G., and Mills, W., “Converting a Small Car to LNG: What Are the Problems and What Can It Do for Economy and Emissions?,” SAE 760376, 1976.
- Ko, Y., et al., “Research and Development of LNG Vehicle for Practical Use,” SAE 920594, Feb. 1992.
- Gebert, K., Beck, J., Barkhimer, R., and Wong, H., “Strategies to Improve Combustion and Emissions Characteristics of Dual-Fuel Pilot Ignited Natural Gas Engines,” SAE 97172, 1997.
- Miller, S. P., “LNG Usage in Two-Stroke Engines,” presented at SAE TOPTEC LNG as a Transportation Fuel-A Progress Update, Houston, Texas, Jan. 1993.
- Cox, G., Del Vecchio, K., Hays, W., Hiltner, J., Nagaraj, R., and Emmer, C., “Development of a Direct-Injected Natural Gas Engine System for Heavy-Duty Vehicles,” NREL/SR-540-27501, Feb. 2000.
- Douville, B., Ouellette, P., and Touchette, A., “Performance and Emissions of a Two-Stroke Engine Fueled Using High-Pressure Direct Injection of Natural Gas,” SAE 981160, Feb. 1998.
- “Westport Innovations Set to Demonstrate Natural Gas Technology on Heavy-Duty Trucks,” Diesel Progress, North American Edition, March 2000.
- Friend, D. G., “Thermophysical Properties of Methane,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref Data, 1989, 18, 583-638.
- Acker, G. H. and Moulton, S. D., “LNG Weathering Effects-Theoretical and Empirical,” GRI-92/0464, Dec. 1992.
- Gibbs, J. L., Bechtold, R. L., and Collison, C. E., “The Effects of LNG Weathering on Fuel Composition and Vehicle Management Techniques,” SAE 952607, Nov. 1995.
- “On-Board Fuel Systems, LNG,” product literature binder published by MVE, Inc., Bloomington, Minnesota, 1996.
- “Liquefied Natural Gas, Alternative Fuel of Choice,” CD-ROM produced by MVE - Chart, MVE PN: 11043727, May 1999.
- Kalet, G., “Advancements in Fuel Conditioning,” presented at Zeus LNG-Powered Heavy-Duty Transportation Conference, Los Angeles, California, Jan. 1996.
- Hurt, J., “Onboard High-Pressure Fuel Delivery Systems,” presented at SAE TOPTEC LNG as a Transportation Fuel-A Progress Update, Houston, Texas, Jan. 1993.
- Bechtold, R., and Gibbs, J., “The Maryland MTA Demonstration of LNG Buses,” Final Report for MTA Contract E-45-1, Oct. 1996.
- Powars, C. and Derbidge, T., “LNG Vehicle High-Pressure Fuel System and ‘Cold Energy’ Utilization,” DOE/ER/82468-2, March 2001.
- Sanly, W., and Werkmeister, L., “LNG Commercial Issues Related to Fuel Tank Design,” presented at Zeus LNG's Energy Integrated Marketplace Conference, Houston, Texas, March 1997.
- “Improvement in LNG Storage Tanks, Full Scale Demonstration Testing,” Program Status Report for Brookhaven National Laboratory Contract 723418, prepared by Cryogenic Fuels, Inc., Nov. 1999.
- Wilding, B., “Natural Gas Vehicle Program, INEEL,” presented at Zeus LNG: Prospecting Downstream Markets Conference, Colorado Springs, Colorado, March 23-25, 1998.
- Lenz, D., “Onboard Low Pressure Fuel Delivery Systems,” presented at SAE TOPTEC LNG as a Transportation Fuel-A Progress Update, Houston, Texas, Jan. 1993.