This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Test Section Configuration on Aerodynamic Drag Measurements
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 05, 2001 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: SAE 2001 World Congress
Aerodynamic measurements in automotive wind tunnels are degraded by test section interference effects, which increase with increasing vehicle blockage ratio. The current popularity of large vehicles (i.e. trucks and sport utility vehicles) makes this a significant issue. This paper describes the results of an experimental investigation carried out in support of the Ford/Sverdrup Driveability Test Facility (DTF), which includes an aero-acoustic wind tunnel (Wind Tunnel No. 8). The objective was to quantify the aerodynamic interference associated with two candidate test section configurations for Wind Tunnel No. 8-semi-open jet and slotted wall. The experiments were carried out at 1/11-scale in Sverdrup laboratories. Four automobile shapes (MIRA models) and six Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) shapes representing blockages from 7% to 25% were used to evaluate changes in measured aerodynamic coefficients for the two test section configurations. This blockage range is appropriate for the 200ft2 nozzle in Wind Tunnel No.8. All results were obtained at zero model yaw, over a Reynolds number range of 7×105 to 1×106 based on model length. In addition to the open jet and slotted wall measurements, Sverdrup's sub-scale adaptive wall tunnel was used to acquire additional reference data. The results highlight the influence of test section configuration on aerodynamic measurements. Drag results are presented here, respective of their importance to automotive development. For the MIRA models, the reference results compare well to those from independent experiments. Comparison of the open jet, slotted wall, and reference results shows the open jet offers less aerodynamic interference than the slotted wall. This, coupled with the acoustic advantages of an open jet, drove the decision to strictly employ an open jet configuration in Wind Tunnel No. 8.
CitationHoffman, J., Martindale, B., Arnette, S., Williams, J. et al., "Effect of Test Section Configuration on Aerodynamic Drag Measurements," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0631, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0631.
SAE 2001 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Number: V110-6 ; Published: 2002-09-15
Number: V110-6 ; Published: 2002-09-15
- Deutenbach, K.-R., “Influence of Plenum Dimensions on Drag Measurements in ¾-Open Jet Automotive Wind Tunnels”, SAE Paper 95100, 1995.
- Hucho, W.-H., Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles, 4th Edition, SAE, 1998.
- Waudby-Smith, P.M., Rainbird, W.J. “Some Principles of Automotive Aerodynamic Testing in Wind Tunnels with Examples from Slotted Wall Test Section Facilities”. SAE Paper 850284, 1985.
- Arnette et al., “On Axial Pressure Distribution and Low Frequency Unsteadiness in Automotive Open Jet Wind Tunnels,” SAE Paper 1998-01-0813, 1998.
- “Closed-Test-Section Wind Tunnel Blockage Corrections for Road Vehicles”, SAE Publication SAE SP-1176, Warrendale, PA, 1996.
- Williams, J., Barlow, J., and Ranzenbach, R. “Effect of Vehicle Aspect Ratio on Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient”, SAE Paper 1999-01-0649, 1999.
- Barlow, J., Guterres, R., Ranzenbach, R., and Williams, J., “Wake Structures of Rectangular Bodies with Radiused Edges Near a Plane Surface,” SAE Paper 1999-01-6148, 1999.
- Whitfield, J.D., Jacocks, J.L., Dietz, W.E., and Pate, S.R., “Demonstration of the Adaptive Wall Concept Applied to an Automotive Wind Tunnel,” SAE Paper 82-0584, 1982.
- Goenka, L.N., and Varner, M.O., “Studies Supporting the Development of an Automotive Adaptive-Wall Wind Tunnel,” SAE Paper 900320, 1990.
- Arnette, S., and Martindale, B., “Advances in Wind Tunnel Aerodynamics for Motorsport Testing” SAE 2000-01-3549, 2000.
- Kuenster, R., Deutenbach, K.-R., Vagt, J.-D., “Measurement of Reference Dynamic Pressure in Open-Jet Wind Tunnels,” SAE Paper 920344, 1992.
- Wallis, S. (Base Pressure Measurements in the Lockheed Tunnel as a function of axial model position) - Unpublished Data.
- “Aerodynamic Testing of Road Vehicles - Open Throat Wind Tunnel Adjustment”. SAE Publication J2071, 1990. Warrendale, PA.
- Ahmadi, M. and Garry, K.P., “Preliminary Investigation of the Influence of a Ground-Plane Boundary Layer on the Aerodynamic Characteristics of Road Vehicle Models Tested Over a Fixed Ground,” SAE Paper 960675.
- White, F.M., Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY 1991.
- Whitfield, J.D., Jacocks, J.L., Dietz, W.E., and Pate, S.R., “Demonstration of the Adaptive-Wall Concept Applied to an Automotive Wind Tunnel,” SAE Paper 820373.
- Mercker, E. and Wiedemann, J., “On the Interference Effects in Open Jet Wind Tunnels,” SAE Paper 960671, 1996.