This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Test Section Configuration on Aerodynamic Drag Measurements
Technical Paper
2001-01-0631
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Event:
SAE 2001 World Congress
Language:
English
Abstract
Aerodynamic measurements in automotive wind tunnels are degraded by test section interference effects, which increase with increasing vehicle blockage ratio. The current popularity of large vehicles (i.e. trucks and sport utility vehicles) makes this a significant issue. This paper describes the results of an experimental investigation carried out in support of the Ford/Sverdrup Driveability Test Facility (DTF), which includes an aero-acoustic wind tunnel (Wind Tunnel No. 8). The objective was to quantify the aerodynamic interference associated with two candidate test section configurations for Wind Tunnel No. 8-semi-open jet and slotted wall. The experiments were carried out at 1/11-scale in Sverdrup laboratories. Four automobile shapes (MIRA models) and six Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) shapes representing blockages from 7% to 25% were used to evaluate changes in measured aerodynamic coefficients for the two test section configurations. This blockage range is appropriate for the 200ft2 nozzle in Wind Tunnel No.8. All results were obtained at zero model yaw, over a Reynolds number range of 7×105 to 1×106 based on model length. In addition to the open jet and slotted wall measurements, Sverdrup's sub-scale adaptive wall tunnel was used to acquire additional reference data. The results highlight the influence of test section configuration on aerodynamic measurements. Drag results are presented here, respective of their importance to automotive development. For the MIRA models, the reference results compare well to those from independent experiments. Comparison of the open jet, slotted wall, and reference results shows the open jet offers less aerodynamic interference than the slotted wall. This, coupled with the acoustic advantages of an open jet, drove the decision to strictly employ an open jet configuration in Wind Tunnel No. 8.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Hoffman, J., Martindale, B., Arnette, S., Williams, J. et al., "Effect of Test Section Configuration on Aerodynamic Drag Measurements," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0631, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0631.Also In
SAE 2001 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Number: V110-6; Published: 2002-09-15
Number: V110-6; Published: 2002-09-15
References
- Deutenbach, K.-R. “Influence of Plenum Dimensions on Drag Measurements in ¾-Open Jet Automotive Wind Tunnels” SAE Paper 95100 1995
- Hucho, W.-H. Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles 4th SAE 1998
- Waudby-Smith, P.M. Rainbird, W.J. “Some Principles of Automotive Aerodynamic Testing in Wind Tunnels with Examples from Slotted Wall Test Section Facilities” SAE Paper 850284 1985
- Arnette et al. “On Axial Pressure Distribution and Low Frequency Unsteadiness in Automotive Open Jet Wind Tunnels,” SAE Paper 1998-01-0813 1998
- “Closed-Test-Section Wind Tunnel Blockage Corrections for Road Vehicles” SAE Publication SAE SP-1176 Warrendale, PA 1996
- Williams, J. Barlow, J. Ranzenbach, R. “Effect of Vehicle Aspect Ratio on Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient” SAE Paper 1999-01-0649 1999
- Barlow, J. Guterres, R. Ranzenbach, R. Williams, J. “Wake Structures of Rectangular Bodies with Radiused Edges Near a Plane Surface,” SAE Paper 1999-01-6148 1999
- Whitfield, J.D. Jacocks, J.L. Dietz, W.E. Pate, S.R. “Demonstration of the Adaptive Wall Concept Applied to an Automotive Wind Tunnel,” SAE Paper 82-0584 1982
- Goenka, L.N. Varner, M.O. “Studies Supporting the Development of an Automotive Adaptive-Wall Wind Tunnel,” SAE Paper 900320 1990
- Arnette, S. Martindale, B. “Advances in Wind Tunnel Aerodynamics for Motorsport Testing” SAE 2000-01-3549 2000
- Kuenster, R. Deutenbach, K.-R. Vagt, J.-D. “Measurement of Reference Dynamic Pressure in Open-Jet Wind Tunnels,” SAE Paper 920344 1992
- Wallis, S. Base Pressure Measurements in the Lockheed Tunnel as a function of axial model position
- “Aerodynamic Testing of Road Vehicles - Open Throat Wind Tunnel Adjustment” SAE Publication J2071 1990 Warrendale, PA
- Ahmadi, M. Garry, K.P. “Preliminary Investigation of the Influence of a Ground-Plane Boundary Layer on the Aerodynamic Characteristics of Road Vehicle Models Tested Over a Fixed Ground,” SAE Paper 960675
- White, F.M. Viscous Fluid Flow McGraw-Hill New York, NY 1991
- Whitfield, J.D. Jacocks, J.L. Dietz, W.E. Pate, S.R. “Demonstration of the Adaptive-Wall Concept Applied to an Automotive Wind Tunnel,” SAE Paper 820373
- Mercker, E. Wiedemann, J. “On the Interference Effects in Open Jet Wind Tunnels,” SAE Paper 960671 1996