This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparison of High-Pressure and Low-Pressure Operation of PEM Fuel Cell Systems
Technical Paper
2001-01-0538
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Event:
SAE 2001 World Congress
Language:
English
Abstract
This paper compares the merits of operating a direct-hydrogen fuel cell (DHFC) system using a high-pressure air supply (compressor) versus one using a low-pressure air supply (blower). Overall, for the system modeled, it is shown that there is no inherent performance advantage for either mode of operation at the DHFC stack level. However, in practical applications, as will be shown in this paper, a systems analysis (stack and air supply) of power and efficiency needs to be performed.
Equivalent PEM DHFC stack peak power values can be obtained using both high-pressure and low-pressure air supply systems. For each air supply configuration, air mass flow and pressure operating conditions can be found that result in an equal value of the oxygen partial pressure at the cathode catalyst layer surface.
However, at the system level, the required air supply power needed to achieve the same DHFC stack performance values can be drastically different for high and low pressure operation. In order to compare the two systems, an optimal air supply control strategy is first developed to obtain the desired stack operating conditions with minimal parasitic loads based on each air supply configuration. Second, the resulting air supply parasitic loads are compared directly between the two configurations - both comparisons are set in the context of the system performance. In other words, the systems are sized such that the peak net power values are equal while the stack gross power may be different.
The results of the study demonstrate the well-known fact that equivalent DHFC peak net system power values (86kW) can be obtained with both types of air supply configurations but require different stack sizes. For the blower application, the stack size had to be increased by 16.3% (500 vs. 430 cells in this example) for a peak net power of 86kW. Differences are also apparent with the WTM sub-system. Quantitative results will be presented for both the high pressure and the low pressure applications.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Cunningham, J., Hoffman, M., and Friedman, D., "A Comparison of High-Pressure and Low-Pressure Operation of PEM Fuel Cell Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0538, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0538.Also In
References
- Badrinarayanan, P. Eggert A. Hauer K.H. “Implications of Water and Thermal Management Parameters in the Optimization of an Indirect Methanol Fuel Cell System,” 35 th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference 24-28 July 2000 Paper # 2000-3046
- Barbir, F. “Air, Water and Heat Management in Automotive Fuel Cell Systems,” Commercializing Fuel Cell Vehicles 2000 conference 12-14 April 2000 Berlin, Germany
- Barbir, F. et al. “Trade-off Design Analysis of Operating Pressure and Temperature in PEM Fuel Cell Systems,” Proceedings of the ASME Advanced Energy Systems Division 39 ASME 1999
- Cunningham, J.M. Friedman D.J. Hoffman M.A. Moore R.M. “Requirements for a Flexible and Realistic Air Supply Model for Incorporation into a Fuel Cell Vehicle (FCV) System Simulation,” SAE Future Transportation Technology Conference and Exposition 17-19 August 1999 SAE # 1999-01-2912 SAE International Warrendale, PA 1999
- Cunningham, J.M. Hoffman M.A. “The Implications of Using an Expander (Turbine) in an Air System of a PEM Fuel Cell Engine,” 17 th International Electric Vehicle Symposium & Exposition 15-18 October 2000 Montreal Quebec
- Doss, E.D. et al. “Pressurized and Atmospheric Pressure Gasoline-Fueled Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell System Performance,” SAE 2000 World Congress March 6-9 2000 SAE # 2000-01-2574 SAE International Warrendale, PA 2000
- Eggert, A. et al. “Water and Thermal Management of an Indirect Methanol Fuel Cell system for Automotive Applications,” Proceedings of the 2000 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition Orlando, FL November 5-10 2000
- Friedman, D.J. Moore R.M. “PEM Fuel Cell System Optimization” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Proton Conducting Membrane Fuel Cells II Gottesfeld S. et al. Electrochemical Society Pennington, NJ 1999
- Friedman, D.J. Eggert A. Badrinarayanan P. Cunningham J.M. “Maximizing the Power Output of an Indirect Methanol PEM Fuel Cell System: Balancing Stack Output, Air Supply, and Water and Thermal Management Demands,” SAE 2001 World Congress March 5-8 2001 SAE # 2001-01-0535 SAE International Warrendale, PA 2001