This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Three Facets of Risk
Technical Paper
2000-01-5594
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Awareness of risk is probably greater today than it has ever been, and the assessment and management of risk-whether or not we think of it as risk-has become common in the lives of many of us. The first part of this paper notes that risk is never about predictable losses, or about either predictable or unpredictable gains; nor is risk a probability. Rather, risk is either a condition of, or a measure of, exposure to misfortune-more concretely, exposure to unpredictable losses. However, as a measure, risk is not one-dimensional-it has three distinct aspects or “facets” related to the anticipated values of unpredictable losses. The three facets are Expected Loss, Variability of Loss Values, and Uncertainty about the Accuracy of Mental Models intended to predict losses. This paper illustrates these three facets of risk by the use of three simple card-game “thought experiments”. An assessment of risk which does not consider all three of these facets is at least incomplete, and can be misleading. The second part of the paper presents an example of how the three-facets-of-risk concept applies specifically to a safety assessment of a mission of an engineered system. The author believes that each risk of interest should be characterized explicitly by a well-defined Risk Event-an event defined by an event assertion which clearly specifies the causes and/or loss values intended to be included within the scope of a particular risk. It is pointed out that the widely-used formula “Risk = Probability × Severity” does not even recognize the second and third facets of risk. Nor does the formula make clear how to address the many practical situations in which a variety of possible causes (Hazardous Events, Outcome Events, and Tragic Events) of losses, and/or a variety of possible resulting Loss Values, are of interest. Furthermore, “Severity” in the formula is often interpreted to mean the greatest possible Loss Value which can be caused by a Hazardous Event-and that interpretation can yield conclusions which are either significantly optimistic or pessimist.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | An Overview of Risk Analysis Methodology |
Technical Paper | FMERA - Failure Modes, Effects, and (Financial) Risk Analysis |
Classroom Training | Common Training for DPRV Personnel |
Authors
Citation
Yellman, T., "The Three Facets of Risk," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-5594, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-5594.Also In
References
- Kaplan Stanley Garrick B. John “On the Quantitative Definition of Risk” Risk Analysis Journal 1 1 1981 11 27
- Kaplan Stan “The Words of Risk Analysis” Risk Analysis Journal 17 4 1997 407 417
- Kaplan Stan “Combining Probability Distributions from Experts in Risk Analysis” Risk Analysis Journal 20 2 2000 155 156
- Clemens P.L “Worst Credible Event-an Important but Flawed Convention” Hazard Prevention (now System Safety Society Journal), Second Quarter 1999 20 22
- Rechard Rob P. “Historical Relationship Between Performance for Radioactive Waste Disposal and Other Types of Risk Assessment” Risk Analysis Journal 19 5 1999
- MIL-STD-882D, Department of Defense Standard Practice for System Safety February 10 2000
- Against the Gods-The Remarkable Story of Risk Bernstein Peter L. John Wiley and Sons
- NUREG/CR-2300 PRA Procedures Guide U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission January 1983
- Ferson Scott Ginzburg Lev R. “Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 54 1996 133 144
- Casman Elizabeth A. Morgan M. Granger Dowlatabadi Hadi “Mixed Levels of Uncertainty in Complex Policy Models” Risk Analysis Journal 19 1 1999 33 42
- Pate-Cornell M. Elisabeth “Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 54 1996 95 111
- Yellman Ted W. “Events, Accidents, Causes and Hazards” Hazard Prevention (now System Safety Society Journal) May/June 1987 14 16
- Yellman Ted W. “Comment on ‘The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis’” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 49 1995 201 205
- Yellman Ted W. “Learning from an Accident” ISASI (International Society of Air Safety Investigators) Forum July-September 1997 25 30
- Yellman Ted W. “Event-Sequence Analysis” Proceedings 1975 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 286 291
- Yellman Ted W. “The Event-Sequence Analysis Concept” Proceedings Tenth International System Safety Conference July 1991
- Yellman Ted W. “System Safety Analysis using a Personal-Computer Word Processor” Proceedings Twelfth International System Safety Conference July 1994
- Yellman Ted W. “Redundancy Killers” SAE Advances in Aviation Safety Conference Daytona Beach, Florida April 1998 981204
- Yellman Ted W. Murray Thomas M. “Some Thoughts about Creating High-Quality System Safety Analyses” Proceedings of the 16 th International System Safety Conference 1998 437 447
- Yellman Ted W. “Failures and Related Topics” IEEE Transactions on Reliability 48 1 1999 March 6 8
- Yellman Ted W. “Event-Sequence Analysis vs. the Fault Tree” Proceedings 1981 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 446 451