This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Identifying Less Stressful Work Methods: Computer-aided Simulation vs. Human Subject Study
Technical Paper
2000-01-2163
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Engineering analyses of work methods can help identify approaches to reduce the risk of occupational injuries; computer-aided simulation technology is effective in terms of time and cost for evaluating multiple work methods. This paper analyzed scaffolding, a common activity in construction with high frequency of overexertion injuries, through a computer simulation model (3DSSPP) to identify less stressful work strategies. A laboratory study was also performed to verify the appropriateness of using the model for scaffolding job analyses.
Seven commonly used end-frame lifting techniques were evaluated. Computer simulations of these work techniques show that considerable biomechanical stress occurs to most of the workers at their shoulders and elbows. A symmetric front-lifting at knuckle height appears to be the less stressful work technique, as determined by computer simulation. The laboratory study of the seven lifting methods, by measuring whole body isometric strength, confirmed the 3DSSPP simulation results. The simulation model is suitable for identifying less stressful work methods; the net benefit achieved from the use of the model is a reduction in testing cost as compared to traditional prototyping methodologies. The “at risk” estimation of the model seems to be conservative when compared to the laboratory experiment results. This is probably because the isometric strength of construction workers is higher than that of workers in manufacturing, which was used in the 3DSSPP model.
Authors
Citation
Hsiao, H., Guan, J., Mayeux, B., and Cutlip, R., "Identifying Less Stressful Work Methods: Computer-aided Simulation vs. Human Subject Study," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2163, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-2163.Also In
SAE 2000 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Number: V109-6; Published: 2001-09-15
Number: V109-6; Published: 2001-09-15
References
- Porter, J.M. Man Models and Computer-aided Ergonomics, Computer Applications in Ergonomics, Occupational Safety and Health Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Ergonomics and Safety 13 20 Tampere, Finland 18-20 May 1992
- National Constructors Association, An Assessment of Carpenter Injury Risks Needing Research, NIOSH DSR task order report Washington, D.C. 1985
- Hsiao, H. Stanevich, R. Biomechanical Evaluation of Frame Scaffolding Tasks International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 18 407 415 1996
- University of Michigan, 3D Static Strength Prediction Program Version 4.2 University of Michigan 1999
- Cutlip, R. Hsiao, H. Becker, E. Garcia, R. Myers, J. Isometric Strength During Scaffold End Frames Disassembly Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper #1999-01-1907 1999
- Caldwell, L.S. Chaffin, D.B. Dukes-Dobos, F.N. Kroemer, K.H.E. Laubach, L.L. Snook, S.H. Snook, S.H. Wasserman, D. E. A Proposed Standard Procedure for Static Muscle Strength Testing American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 35 4 1974
- Chaffin, D.B. Herrin, G.D. Keyserling, W. M. Preemployment Strength Testing Journal of Occupational Medicine 20 1978
- Hahn, G. J. Meeker, W. Q. Statistical Intervals: A Guide for Practitioners, Wiley 1991