This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Demonstration of Caterpillar C10 Dual Fuel Natural Gas Engines in Commuter Buses
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 06, 2000 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: SAE 2000 World Congress
Optimized 1997 model year Caterpillar C10 dual-fuel natural gas engines certified to the California Air Resources Board's Alternative Low NOx 2.5 gram/brake horsepower-hour emission standard were demonstrated in three commuter buses over a 12-month period, in Santa Barbara, California. The project evaluated the retrofit costs and process, performance, reliability, fuel economy, operating costs, and emissions of the three C-10 dual-fuel natural gas engines compared to a standard C-10 diesel engine. Chassis dynamometer tests using the U.S. EPA Urban Dynamometer Drive Schedule, the Central Business District (West Virginia University version) and the 55-mph Steady State cycles were conducted to characterize in-use emissions of the dual-fuel engines for the commuter bus application.
During 94,000 combined service miles, performance, reliability and durability of the dual fuel buses were similar to the diesel control. Compared to the diesel control, the C-10 dual fuel natural gas engine operating in the dual fuel mode had 27 to 60% average lower NOx, PM and CO2 (14 to 19%) emissions for all cycles. CO and NMHC emissions were higher than expected. CNG use was two-thirds the expected level and could be improved. Fuel economy was within 11 percent of the diesel fuel economy. Operating costs for the dual-fuel buses were nearly twice the diesel bus costs due to the CNG component costs, lower fuel economy and refueling costs. This cost difference can be eliminated over a longer operating period if CNG prices are less than diesel fuel prices. This report documents how the Caterpillar C10 dual fuel natural gas engines performed in a commuter bus application during 94,000 miles of service.
- J. McKinley Addy - California Energy Commission (CEC)
- Avtar Bining - California Energy Commission (CEC)
- Paul Norton - National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
- Eric Peterson - Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD)
- Kevin Campbell - Power Systems Associates (PSA)
- Oreste Bevillaqua - Clean Air Vehicle Technology Center (CAVTC)
CitationAddy, J., Bining, A., Norton, P., Peterson, E. et al., "Demonstration of Caterpillar C10 Dual Fuel Natural Gas Engines in Commuter Buses," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1386, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-1386.
- Demonstration of Caterpillar C-10 Dual Fuel Engines in MCI 102DL3 Commuter Buses, Draft final report to NREL, June 1999.
- Addy, J.M, “Demonstration of Caterpillar C-10 Dual Fuel Engines in Commuter Buses: Successes and Challenges”, 5th Annual National Clean Cities Conference, May 1999
- For example, see the following World Wide Web site: http://www.energy.ca.gov/afvs/schoolbus/
- “Data Collection Plan for CNG Medium-duty Vehicle Demonstration Program”, California Energy Commission, 1996
- Chandler, K., Norton, P., and Clark, N., “Alternative Fuel Truck Evaluation Project- Design and Preliminary Results” SAE Paper 981392, 1998.
- Dual-Fuel Truck Fleet Start-up Experience, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/BR-540-25118, September, 1998.
- Personal Communication, Campbell, K. March 1999
- Turner, S.H. and Weaver, C.S., “Dual-Fuel Natural Gas/Diesel Engines: Technology, Performance, and Emissions,” Gas Research Institute, GRI-94/0094, 1994.
- Gebert, K., Beck, N.J., Barkhimer, R.L., Wong, H.C., and Wells, A.D., “Development of Pilot Fuel Injection Sustem for CNG Engine,” SAE Paper, SAE 961100, 1996.
- Osenga, M., “Cat Introduces Dual Fuel Truck Engines”, Diesel Progress, August 1996.
- Beck, N. J., Barkhimer, R.L., Johnson, W.P., Wong, H.C., and Gebert, K., “Evolution of Heavy Duty Natural Gas Engines - Stoichiomentric, Carbureted and Spark Ignited to Lean Burn, Fuel-Injected and Micro -Pilot,” SAE Paper, SAE 972665, 1997.
- “Vehicle Demonstration of High Efficiency/Low Emission Heavy-duty Natural Gas Engines”, Technical Proposal to California Energy Commission RFP No. 500-93-506, February, 1994
- Dunlap, L.S., Pellegrin, V., Ikeda, R., Wilson, R., Sylvia, S., Porter, H., “Chassis Dynamometer Emissions Testing Results for Diesel and Alternative Fueled Buses” SAE Paper 931783, 1993
- Code of Federal Regulations 40, Part 86, Subparts B, D, and N, specifically “Emission Regulations for New Otto-Cycle and Diesel Heavy-duty Engines: Gaseous and Particulate Exhaust Test Procedures.
- EPA Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule for Heavy-duty Vehicles, Code of Federal Regulations 40, Part 86, Appendix I, Section (d), 1991.
- Clark, N.N., Gautan, M., Rapp, B., Lyons, D.W., Graboski, M.S., McCormick, R.L., Alleman, T.L., and Norton, P., “Diesel and CNG Transit Bus Emissions Characterization by Two Chassis Dynamometer Laboratories: Results and Issues,” SAE Paper, SAE 1999-01-1469, 1999.
- Clark. N. N., Lyons, D. W.. Wang, W., Rapp, B. L., Gautam, M., Wang, W., Norton, P., White, C., and Chandler, K., “Emissions from Trucks and Buses Powered by Cummins L-10 Natural Gas Engines”, SAE Paper 981393, 1998.
- Clark, N. N., Gautam M., Lyons, D. W., Bata, R. M., Wang, W., Norton, P., and Chandler, K. “Natural Gas and Diesel Transit Bus Emissions: Review and Recent Data,” SAE Paper 973203, 1997.