This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Dynamics of Multiple-Injection Fuel Sprays in a Small-bore HSDI Diesel Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 06, 2000 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: SAE 2000 World Congress
An experimental study was conducted to characterize the dynamics and spray behavior of a wide range of minisac and Valve-Covered-Orifice (VCO) nozzles using a high-pressure diesel common-rail system. The measurements show that the resultant injection-rate is strongly dependent on common-rail pressure, nozzle hole diameter, and nozzle type. For split injection the dwell between injections strongly affects the second injection in regards to the needle lift profile and the injected fuel amount. The minisac nozzle can be used to achieve shorter pilot injections at lower common-rail pressures than the VCO nozzle.
Penetration photographs of spray development in a high pressure, optical spray chamber were obtained and analyzed for each test condition. Spray symmetry and spray structure were found to depend significantly on the nozzle type. The minisac class of diesel nozzle definitely exhibits superior characteristics regarding hole-to-hole spray symmetry, whereas the VCO class of diesel nozzles produce a more asymmetric, but more dispersed spray plume, with potentially better fuel-air mixing performance than the minisac nozzle. The dual-guided VCO class of nozzle does not significantly improve the spray symmetry over that of the single-guided nozzle. However measurement of spray tip penetration length shows that the dual-guided VCO nozzle provides higher spray-tip velocities than is achieved for single-guided tips. The results obtained show that the liquid spray tip penetration mainly depends on nozzle type, needle guiding strategy, injection pressure, and ambient gas pressure.
Close to nozzle exit spray dynamics observation was carried out. The microscopic visualization results provide very interesting and dynamic information on spray structure, showing spray angle variations, injection-to-injection variation, and primary breakup processes not observed using conventional macroscopic visualization techniques. The near-field spray behavior is shown to be highly transient, strongly depend on the injector design, nozzle geometry, needle lift and vibration, and injection pressure which is a function of the injection system.
- Joong-Sub Han - Wayne State University
- T. C. Wang - Wayne State University
- X. B Xie - Wayne State University
- Ming-Chia Lai - Wayne State University
- Naeim A. Henein - Wayne State University
- David L. Harrington - General Motor Research & Development Center
- John Pinson - General Motor Research & Development Center
- Paul C. Miles - Sandia National Laboratories
CitationHan, J., Wang, T., Xie, X., Lai, M. et al., "Dynamics of Multiple-Injection Fuel Sprays in a Small-bore HSDI Diesel Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1256, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-1256.
- Bosch, Wilhelm, (1966) “The Fuel Rate Indicator; A new Measuring Instrument For Display of the Characteristics of Individual Injection,” SAE 660749.
- Boehner, W. Hummel, K. (1997) “Common Rail Injection System for Commercial Diesel Vehicles,” SAE 970345.
- Dan, T., Takagishi, S. Senda, J. and Fujimoto, H. (1997) “Effect of Ambient Gas Properties for Characteristics of a Non-Reacting Diesel Fuel Spray,” SAE paper 970352
- Farrell, P.V. Chang, C.T. and Su, T.F (1996) “High Pressure Multiple Injection Spray Characteristics,” SAE 960860
- Harrington, D., and Lai, M.-C., (1998) “Characterization and Visualization of Hole-To-Hole Variation and Wall Impingement of Diesel Sprays,” ILASS AMERICAS '98, pp. 106-110.
- Hoffmann, V.L.H Hummel, K Maderstein, T. and Peters A.(1997) “Das Common-Rail-Einspritzsystemein neues Kapitel der Dieseleinspitztechnik,” MTZ 10/97 P572 - P582.
- Han, J.S, Wang T.C and Lai, M.-C., “Common-Rail Diesel Fuel Injection System Dynamics and Spray Characterization,” ILASS AMERICAS '99. pp. 201-205.
- Qin,J.R, Dan,T. Lai, M.C (1999) “Correlating the Diesel Spray Behavior to Nozzle Design,” SAE 1999-01-3555.
- Lai, M.-C., Wang, T.-C., Xie, X., Han, J.S, Henein, N. A., Schwarz, E., and Bryzik, W., (1998) “Microscopic characterization of Diesel Sprays at VCO Nozzle Exit” SAE 982542.
- Renner, G. Koyanagi,K. and Maly R.R. (1998) “Effect of Common-rail Injector Design on the Emission Characteristics of Passenger Car DI Diesel Engines”, COMODIA 98, P 477 - P 482
- Siebers, D.L. “Scaling Liquid -Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays Based on Mixing -Limited Vaporization,” SAE paper 1999-01-0528.
- Wang, T. C Han, J.S. Xie, X.B. Lai, M.C, Henein N.A (1999) “Direct Visualization of High Pressure Diesel Spray and Engine Combustion,” SAE 1999-01-3496.
- Hiroyasu, H., and Kadota, T., and Arai, M., (1983) “Development and Use of a Spray Combustion Modeling to Predict Diesel Engine Efficiency and Pollutant Emission”, Bulletin of the JSME. Vol 26, No. 214, April 1983.
- Kuo, T.W.,(1987) “Evaluation of a Phenomenological Spray-Combustion Model for Two Open-Chamber Diesel Engines”, SAE paper, Nov. 2-5, 872057, 1987.
- Soteriou, C., Andrews, R., and Smith, M.,(1995) “Direct Injection Diesel Sprays and the Effect of Cavitation and hydraulic Flip on Atomization”, SAE Paper 950080, 1995