This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Cylinder-by-Cylinder Engine Models Vs Mean Value Engine Models for Use in Powertrain Control Applications
Technical Paper
1999-01-0906
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
An investigation of the need of engine model complexity for use in powertrain control applications is presented in this paper. The engine studied is an SI-engine, but the analysis methods could easily be adapted to a CI-engine. The different engine models investigated are a cylinder-by-cylinder engine model and a mean value engine model. The way to evaluate the engine models is to compare the dynamical behavior and how the engine affects the driveline. The analysis is made by studying the engine in the frequency and time domain.
The investigation shows that the mean value engine model is sufficient for use in powertrain simulations and for powertrain control design. The dynamical behavior for the two models coincide, and the combustion pulses are well damped in the driveline (powertrain without engine). A less complex structure is preferable when designing a control system. However, to study the effects of backlash it can not be concluded which degree of engine model complexity to use, since it depends on the time spent in the backlash as well as the control strategy.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Infinitely Variable Transmission Utilizing Oscillating Torque |
Authors
Citation
Karlsson, J. and Fredriksson, J., "Cylinder-by-Cylinder Engine Models Vs Mean Value Engine Models for Use in Powertrain Control Applications," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0906, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-0906.Also In
References
- Kao, M. Moskwa, J.J. “Turbocharged Diesel Engine Modeling for Nonlinear Engine Control and State Estimation” Transactions of the ASME 117 March 1995
- Hendricks, E. Sorenson, S.C. “Mean Value Modelling of Spark Ignition Engines” SAE Paper No. 900616 1990
- Dobner, D.J. “A Mathematical Engine Model for Development of Dynamic Engine Control” SAE Paper 800054 1980
- Abida Jamil Claude Daniel “Spark ignition engines and pollution emission: New approaches in modelling and control” Int. J. of Vehicle Design 15 3 4 5 1994
- Hendricks, E. Sorenson, S. C. “SI Engine Controls and Mean Value Modelling” SAE Technical Paper No. 910258 1991
- Andersson, M. Johansson, K. “A Literature Survey on Integrated Powertrain Control” Machine and Vehicle Design Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg March 1998
- Anderson, S.R. Ciesla, C.R. Carey, D.M. Raja, S. “A Powertrain Simulation for Engine Control System Development” SAE Paper No. 962171 1996
- Pettersson, M. “Driveline Modelling and Control” Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University Linköping, Sweden 1997
- Mo, C.Y. Beaumount, A.J. Powell, N.N. “Active Control of Driveability” SAE Paper No. 960046 1996
- Cho. D. Hedrick, J.K. “Automotive Powertrain Modeling for Control” Transactions of the ASME 111 December 1989
- Rabeih, E.M.A. Crolla, D.A. “Intelligent control of clutch judder and shunt phenomena in vehicle drivelines” Int. J. of Vehicle Design 17 3 318 332 1996
- Elmqvist, H. Brück, D. Otter, M. “Dymola User's Manual” Dynasim AB Lund, Sweden 1996
- Baruah, P.C. “A Simulation Model for Transient Operation of Spark-Ignition Engines” SAE Paper No. 900682 1990
- Jacobson, B. et al. “Modular Modelling and Simulation Tool for Evaluation of Powertrain Performance” Machine and Vehicle Design Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg 1998
- Oppenheim, A.V. Willsky, A.S. “Signals and Systems” 2nd Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA 1997
- Åström, K-J Wittenmark, B. “Adaptive Control” 2nd Addison-Wesley 3 9 1995