This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Quantifying the Direct Field of View when Using Driver-Side Rearview Mirrors
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 01, 1999 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
In a static field study we tested drivers’ abilities to detect vehicles in the periphery of their direct fields of view while they gazed toward the driver-side exterior rearview mirror of a passenger car. The results indicate that both younger and older drivers can detect vehicles with reasonable efficiency even in far peripheral vision. However, the results also indicate that using peripheral vision entails a cost in terms of lengthened reaction time. Although that cost seems modest in comparison with the normal durations of glances to rearview mirrors and of direct looks to the rear, it is not clear from this study alone how the reaction time cost might influence the scanning strategies that drivers actually use in driving. The present study was oriented more to testing drivers’ basic visual capabilities than to outlining their overall strategies. Tentatively, it appears that the traditional way of defining the blind zone-by assuming a 180° direct field of view- is reasonably accurate. The forward limit of the blind zone would therefore be approximately 135° from the straight ahead when a driver looks toward a driver-side rearview mirror that is itself 45° from the straight ahead. Proposed solutions to the blind-zone problem, such as nonplanar mirrors with relatively wide fields of view, should therefore address the zone between the edge of a vehicle and a line about 45° out from that edge.
CitationFlannagan, M., Sivak, M., and Traube, E., "Quantifying the Direct Field of View when Using Driver-Side Rearview Mirrors," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0656, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-0656.
- Ball, K. Owsley, C Beard, B. 1990 Clinical visual perimetry underestimates peripheral field problems in older adults Clinical Vision Sciences 5 113 125
- Ball, K. Owsley, C Sloane, M. E. Roenker, D. L Bruni, J. R. 1993 Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 34 3110 3123
- Burg, A. 1968 Lateral visual field as related to age and sex Journal of Applied Psychology 52 10 15
- Connolly, P. L. 1964 Human factors in rear vision Design aspects for rear vision in motor vehicles., SP-253 1 17 New York Society of Automotive Engineers
- Flannagan, C. A. C Flannagan, M. J. 1998 Acceptance of nonplanar rearview mirrors by U.S. drivers Shen, W. Veldman, R. Vertiz, A. M. Zobel G. Human factors in driving, vehicle seating, and rear vision, SP-1358 165 170 Warrendale, Pennsylvania Society of Automotive Engineers
- Helmers, G. Flannagan, M. J. Sivak, M. Owens, D. A. Battle, D. A. Sato, T. 1992 Response times using flat, convex, and multiradius rearview mirrors (Report No. UMTRI-92-20) Ann Arbor The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
- Marcus, K. H. 1964 In the vehicle and on the road Design aspects for rear vision in motor vehicles, SP-253 18 26 New York Society of Automotive Engineers
- Mourant, R. R. Donohue, R. J. 1974 Mirror sampling characteristics of drivers (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 740964 ) Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers
- Olson, P. L. Winkler, C. B. 1985 Measurement of crash avoidance characteristics of vehicles in use (Report No. UMTRI-85-20) Ann Arbor The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
- Platzer, G. E. 1995 The geometry of automotive rearview mirrors: Why blind zones exist and strategies to overcome them (SAE Technical PaperSeries No. 950601 ) Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers
- Society of Automotive Engineers 1995 Information report SAE J985: Vision factors considerations in rearview mirror design (rev. June 1995) Warrendale, Pennsylvania Society of Automotive Engineers