This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Theory of Cost Risk in Design
Technical Paper
1999-01-0495
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
In a recent paper (Hoult & Meador, [1]) a novel method of estimating the costs of parts, and assemblies of parts, was presented. This paper proposed that the metric for increments of cost was the function log (dimension/tolerance). Although such log functions have a history,given in [1], starting with Boltzman and Shannon, it is curious that it arises in cost models. In particular, the thermodynamic basis of information theory, given by Shannon [2], seems quite implausible in the present context. In [1], we called the cost theory “Complexity Theory”, mainly to distinguish it from information theory. A major purpose of the present paper is to present a rigorous argument of how the log function arises in the present context. It happens that the agrument hinges on two key issues: properties of the machine making or assembling the part, and a certain limit process. Neither involves thermodynamic reasoning. Such abstruse agruments should hardly interest the readers of engineering articles, such as this one. But buried in the theory is a fascinating gem: the idea that the risk of a design can be estimated rigorously. Let's begin by describing the contents of this report.
In [1], it was assumed that log (dimension/tolerance) was the metric for the effort (time) to fabricate a design feature. With this assumption, it was shown that fabrication times were proportional to the sum of the logs. This idea was successfully tested on some 100 parts, and three manufacturing processes. In this paper, we show how the log function arises from a certain limit process, and assumptions about good engineering practice. These theorems occupy Section II of the paper.
Section II sets the stage for the major results of the paper. If it is true that there is a rigorous agrument that the log function is correct, then maybe there is some rigorous argument that “the error in the estimate increased as the dimension information increased”, as was stated at the end of [1]. Section III is devoted to the theorem which relates the uncertainty in manufacturing time to features of a design.
Cost estimating methods, dealt with in Section II, have been explored for many years, and have been reviewed in [1]. Wilson [2] proposed the use of component or design dimensions and tolerances as a metric to quantify the information transmission of a manufacturing process, a proposal which we make rigorous. He proposed an analogy between manufacturing and communication. But classical communications theorems [3] do not apply directly to the manufacturing process.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Hoult, D. and Meador, C., "The Theory of Cost Risk in Design," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0495, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-0495.Also In
References
- Hoult, David P. Meador, C. Lawrence Prediciting Product Manufactruing Costs From Design Attributes: A Complexity Approach SAE paper #96003
- Wilson, David, R. An Exploratory Study of Complexity in Axiomatic Design Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT 1980
- Shannon, Claude E. Weaver, Warren The Mathematical Theory of Communication University of Illinois Press 1949
- Fitts, Paul M. Posner, Micheal I. Human Performance Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. Basic Concepts in Psychology Series 1967
- Annett, J. Golby, C. W. Kay, H. The Measurement of Elements in an Assembly Task-The Information Output of the Human Motor System The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1958 10
- Gutowski T. et. al Development of a theoretical cost model for advanced composite fabrication Composites Manufacturing 5 4 1994 231 239
- Hoult, David P. Meador, C. Lawrence Maunfacturing Cost Estimating ASM Handbook 20 December 1997 ASM International Materials Park, Ohio