This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Vapor and Liquid Composition Differences Resulting from Fuel Evaporation
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 01, 1999 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Liquid fuels and the fuel vapors in equilibrium with them typically differ in composition. These differences impact automotive fuel systems in several ways. Large compositional differences between liquid and vapor phases affect the composition of species taken up within the evaporative emission control canister, since the canister typically operates far from saturation and doesn't reach equilibrium with the fuel tank. Here we discuss how these differences may be used to diagnose the mode of emission from a sealed container, e.g., a fuel tank. Liquid or vapor leaks lead to particular compositions (reported here) that depend on the fuel components but are independent of the container material. Permeation leads to emissions whose composition depends on the container material. If information on the relative permeation rates of the different fuel components is available, the results given here provide a tool to decide whether leakage or permeation is the dominant mode of emission.
Using well-established methods based on vapor-liquid equilibria, generalized vapor-phase correlations, and the UNIFAC model for liquid-phase nonideality, we have calculated the magnitude of the compositional difference for each species in several model fuel mixtures, as a function of temperature. In fuel C, a binary iso-octane/toluene mixture (of 1:1 volume ratio or 4:5 mass ratio), we find that the vapor is enriched in iso-octane to a 2:1 mass ratio. In ternary mixtures that contain alcohols at low concentrations (e.g., CM15), the vapor mass fraction of alcohol exceeds its liquid-phase mass fraction by a factor of three or more. In the same mixtures at high alcohol concentrations, the vapor mass fraction of iso-octane exceeds its liquid-phase mass fraction by a factor of 5 or more. The relative vapor mass fractions (on an air-free basis) of each species change with increasing temperature: the relative iso-octane fraction decreases, the relative toluene fraction increases slightly, and the relative alcohol fraction increases significantly. Results for ternary mixtures that contain MTBE and for a model indolene fuel are also presented.
|Ground Vehicle Standard||Fuel Systems and Components - Electrostatic Charge Mitigation|
|Technical Paper||Simulation of Sloshing and Ballooning in Fuel Tanks for High Speed Impacts|
|Technical Paper||A Parametric Vehicle Fuel Tank Filling System Model|
CitationGreenfield, M. and Rossi, G., "Vapor and Liquid Composition Differences Resulting from Fuel Evaporation," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0377, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-0377.
SAE 1999 Transactions - Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Number: V108-4 ; Published: 2000-09-15
Number: V108-4 ; Published: 2000-09-15
- Owen K. and Coley T., Automotive Fuels Handbook, SAE, Warrendale, PA (1990).
- SAE Fuels and Lubricants Standard Manual - HS-23, SAE, Warrendale, PA (1994).
- Fuel and Lubricants Primer for Automotive Engineers - SP-471, SAE, Warrendale, PA (1986).
- Prausnitz J.M., Lichtenthaler R.N., and de Azevedo E.G., Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid-Phase Equilibria, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (1986).
- In some mixtures, at a fixed pressure and temperature, there may exist isolated values of the mixture composition (azeotrope points) where the composition of the vapor and liquid phase do coincide.
- Nulman M., Olejnik A., Samus M.A., Fead E. and Rossi G., “Fuel Permeation Performance of Polymeric Materials Analyzed by Gas Chromatography and Sorption Techniques”, SAE Technical Paper 981360 (1998).
- Fead E., Vengadam R., Rossi G., Olejinik A. and Thorn J., “Speciation of Evaporative Emissions from Plastic Fuel Tanks”, SAE Technical Paper 981376 (1998).
- Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR, Ch. I, Subpart B - § 86.101 to § 86.157.
- Fredenslund A.A., Jones R.L., and Prausnitz J.M., “Group-Contribution Estimation of Activity Coefficients in Nonideal Liquid Mixtures”, AIChE J., 21:1086-1099 (1975).
- Smith J.M. and Van Ness H.C., Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, New York: McGraw-Hill (1987).
- Greenfield M.L., Lavoie G.A., Smith C.S., and Curtis E.W., “Macroscopic Model of the D86 Fuel Volatility Procedure”, SAE Technical Paper 982724 (1998).
- Reddy S.R., “Evaporative Emissions from Gasolines and Alcohol-Containing Gasolines with Closely Matched Volatilities”, SAE Technical Paper 861556 (1986).
- Reid R.C., Prausnitz J.M., and Poling B.E., The Properties of Gases and Liquids, New York: McGraw-Hill (1987).
- Dean J.A., ed, Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 13th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill (1985).
- Hatzioannidis I., Voutsas E.C., Lois E., and Tassios D.P., “Measurement and Prediction of Reid Vapor Pressure of Gasoline in the Presence of Additives”, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 43:386-392 (1998).
- Larsen B.L., Rasmussen P., and Fredenslund A., “A Modified UNIFAC Group-Contribution Model for Prediction of Phase Equilibria and Heats of Mixing”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26:2274-2286 (1987).
- SAE Recommended Practice J1681, SEP93, p. 12.76.