This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Design and Control Co-optimization of a Mixed Hybrid Electric Powertrain Architecture
Journal Article
14-12-02-0010
ISSN: 2691-3747, e-ISSN: 2691-3755
Sector:
Topic:
Citation:
Yi, C., Hofmann, H., and Epureanu, B., "Design and Control Co-optimization of a Mixed Hybrid Electric Powertrain Architecture," SAE Int. J. Elec. Veh. 12(2):185-200, 2023, https://doi.org/10.4271/14-12-02-0010.
Language:
English
Abstract:
Electrification of vehicles can improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions in
vehicle operations. Studies have focused on designing powertrains of several
topologies, including serial, parallel, and power-split hybrid powertrains. In
this study, a design and control co-optimization is demonstrated for a novel
mixed-powertrain architecture. The component sizes of the mixed powertrain are
optimized to minimize the fuel and component costs. Nested optimization is
applied with a surrogate integrated operation and control model that evaluates
powertrain performance in the inner loop. The surrogate model is trained to
capture the powertrain performance under a near-optimal power management
approach, namely, the equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS). Using
sequential quadratic programming, optimal results are obtained and verified
using a high-fidelity powertrain model which is equipped with ECMS control.
Multiple optimal designs can be selected for this multi-objective optimization
problem. All designs can either improve the fuel economy or reduce the component
sizes, or both, depending on the weighing of fuel economy and component cost.
Compared to the original design, one of the optimal solutions can improve the
fuel economy by 24.5% while keeping component sizes similar. Another optimal
design can achieve similar fuel economy while reducing the rated power of the
electric machines by 49.2% and 30.1%, the battery voltage by 51.3%, and battery
capacity by 72.9%. Four selected commercially available powertrain architectures
are investigated to benchmark the mixed powertrain. The fuel economies of the
benchmark architectures are up to 15% different compared to the fuel economy of
the mixed powertrain. The range in both component and fuel cost of the Pareto
front of the mixed powertrain is widest among the powertrains in this study.