Open Access

Situational Awareness, Driver’s Trust in Automated Driving Systems and Secondary Task Performance

Journal Article
ISSN: 2574-0741, e-ISSN: 2574-075X
Published May 16, 2019 by SAE International in United States
Situational Awareness, Driver’s Trust in Automated Driving Systems and Secondary Task Performance
Citation: Petersen, L., Robert, L., Yang, X., and Tilbury, D., "Situational Awareness, Driver’s Trust in Automated Driving Systems and Secondary Task Performance," SAE Intl. J CAV 2(2):129-141, 2019,
Language: English


  1. Alcázar, H., Martinez, J., Pantoja, L., Collazos, C. et al. , “Method for Incorporating Awareness Mechanisms in Driving Simulation Environments,” IEEE Latin America Transactions 12(1):36-41, 2014.
  2. Beller, J., Heesen, M., and Vollrath, M. , “Improving the Driver-Automation Interaction: An Approach Using Automation Uncertainty,” Human Factors 55(6):1130-1141, 2013.
  3. Billings, D., Schaefer, K., Llorens, N., and Hancock, P. , “What Is Trust? Defining the Construct Across Domains,” in Poster presented at the American Psychological Association Conference, Division 21, Orlando, FL, USA, 2012.
  4. Carsten, O., Lai, F.C.H., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A.H. et al. , “Control Task Substitution in Semiautomated Driving: Does it Matter What Aspects Are Automated?” Human Factors 54(5):747-761, 2012.
  5. Charalampous, K., Kostavelis, I., and Gasteratos, A. , “Recent Trends in Social Aware Robot Navigation: A Survey,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 93:85-104, 2017.
  6. Durst, P.J., Goodin, C., Cummins, C., Gates, B., et al. , “A Real-Time, Interactive Simulation Environment for Unmanned Ground Vehicles: The Autonomous Navigation Virtual Environment Laboratory (ANVEL),” in Information and Computing Science (ICIC), 2012 Fifth International Conference on, 2012, 7-10.
  7. Endsley, M.R. , “Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems,” Human Factors 37(1):32-64, 1995a.
  8. Endsley, M.R. , “Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems,” Human Factors 37:65-84, 1995b.
  9. Graf, C. and Krebs, M. , “Headlight Factors and Nighttime Vision: Final Report,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1976.
  10. Gremillion, G.M., Metcalfe, J.S., Marathe, A.R., Paul, V.J., et al. , “Analysis of Trust in Autonomy for Convoy Operations.”in Micro- and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and Applications VIII, 9836: 98361Z, May 2016.
  11. Helldin, T., Falkman, G., Riveiro, M., and Davidsson, S. , “Presenting System Uncertainty in Automotive UIS for Supporting Trust Calibration in Autonomous Driving,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications,October 2013, 210-217.
  12. Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., and Krems, J.F. , “Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust during Highly Automated Driving,” Human Factors 58(3):509-519, 2016.
  13. Heydarian, A., Carneiro, J.P., Gerber, D., Becerik-Gerber, B. et al. , “Immersive Virtual Environments Versus Physical Built Environments: A Benchmarking Study for Building Design and User-Built Environment Explorations,” Automation in Construction 54:116-126, 2015.
  14. Ho, G., Wheatley, D., and Scialfa, C. , “Age Differences in Trust and Reliance of a Medication Management System,” Interacting with Computers 17(6):690-710, 2005.
  15. Hoff, K.A. and Bashir, M. , “Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust,” Human Factors 57(3):407-434, 2015.
  16. International Organization for Standardization , “Road Vehicles-Ergonomic Aspects of Transport Information and Control Systems-Calibration Tasks for Methods Which Assess Driver Demand Due to the Use of In-vehicle Systems,” ISO/TS 14198: 2012, 2012.
  17. Hsieh, L., Seaman, S., and Young, R.A. , “Eye Glance Analysis of the Surrogate Tests for Driver Distraction,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 2015, 140-146.
  18. Lee, J.D. and See, K.A. , “Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance,” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46(1):50-80, 2004, doi:10.1518/hfes.
  19. Lees, M. and Lee, J.D. , “The Influence of Distraction and Driving Context on Driver Response to Imperfect Collision Warning Systems,” Ergonomics 50(8):1264-1286, 2007.
  20. Ma, R. and Kaber, D.B. , “Situation Awareness and Workload in Driving While Using Adaptive Cruise Control and a Cell Phone,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35(10):939-953, 2005.
  21. Maltz, M. and Shinar, D. , “Imperfect In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning Systems Can Aid Drivers,” Human Factors 46(2):357-366, 2004.
  22. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., and Schoorman, F.D. , “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust,” Academy of Management Review 20(3):709-734, 1995.
  23. McBride, S.E., Rogers, W.A., and Fisk, A.D. , “Do Younger and Older Adults Differentially Depend on an Automated System?” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 54(2):175-179, 2010.
  24. Meehan, M., Insko, B., Whitton, M., and Brooks, F.P. Jr , “Physiological Measures of Presence in Stressful Virtual Environments,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '02), 2002, 645-652.
  25. Miller, D., Sun, A., and Wendy, J. , “Situation Awareness with Different Levels of Automation,” in Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, October 2014, 688-693.
  26. Mueller, S.T. and Piper, B.J. , “The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods 222:250-259, 2014.
  27. Muir, B.M. and Moray, N. , “Trust in Automation. Part II. Experimental Studies of Trust and Human Intervention in a Process Control Simulation,” Ergonomics 39(3):429-460, 1996.
  28. Nunnally, J.C. , Psychometric Theory Second Edition (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978), 245.
  29. Parasuraman, R., Cosenzo, K.A., and De Visser, E. , “Adaptive Automation for Human Supervision of Multiple Uninhabited Vehicles: Effects on Change Detection, Situation Awareness, and Mental Workload,” Military Psychology 21(2):270, 2009.
  30. Petermeijer, S., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K., and de Winter, J. , “Take-Over Again: Investigating Multimodal and Directional TORs to Get the Driver Back into the Loop,” Applied Ergonomics, 62:204-215, 2017.
  31. Rezvani, T., Driggs-Campbell, K., Dorsa, S., Shankar Sastry, S. et al. , “Towards Trustworthy Automation: User Interfaces that Convey Internal and External Awareness,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on, November 2016, 682-688.
  32. Robert, L.P. , “Monitoring and Trust in Virtual Teams,” in Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 2016, 245-259.
  33. Robert, L.P., Dennis, A., and Hung, Y.-T.C. , “Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members,” Journal of Management Information Systems 26(2):241-279, 2009.
  34. SAE On-Road AV Standards Committee , “Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems,” SAE Standard J 3016, 2014, 1-16.
  35. Saleh, K., Hossny, M., and Nahavandi, S. ,“Towards Trusted Autonomous Vehicles from Vulnerable Road Users Perspective,” in Systems Conference (SysCon), 2017 Annual IEEE International, 2017, 1-7.
  36. Selcon, S.J. and Taylor, R.M. , “Evaluation of the SA Rating Technique (SART) as a Tool for Aircrew Systems Design,” in AGARD, SA in Aerospace Operations, 1990.
  37. Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., and Parasuraman, R. , “Automation-Induced ‘Complacency’: Development of the Complacency-Potential Rating Scale,” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3(2):111-122, 1993.
  38. Stockert, S., Richardson, N.T., and Lienkamp, M. , “Driving in an Increasingly Automated World-Approaches to Improve the Driver-Automation Interaction,” Procedia Manufacturing 3:2889-2896, 2015.
  39. Taylor, R.M. , Chapter 3: Situation Awareness Rating Technique (SART): The Development of a Tool for Aircrew Systems Design, SA in Aerospace Operations (Ft. Belvoir, VA,Defense Technical Information Center, 1990).
  40. Thayer, J.F., Åhsc, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers, J.J. III et al. , “A Meta-Analysis of HRV and Neuroimaging Studies: Implications for HRV as a Marker of Stress and Health,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 36(2):747-756, 2012.
  41. Thayer, J.F. and Lane, R.D. , “The Role of Vagal Function in the Risk for Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality,” Biological Psychology 74(2):224-242, 2007.
  42. Verberne, F., Ham, J., and Midden, C. , “Trust in Smart Systems: Sharing Driving Goals and Giving Information to Increase Trustworthiness and Acceptability of Smart Systems in Cars,” Human Factors 54(5):799-810, 2012.
  43. West, B.T., Welch, K.B., and Galecki, A.T. , Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software (New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007).
  44. Wickens, L. and Rice , “Chapter 11: Imperfect Reliability in Unmanned Air Vehicle Supervision and Control,” . In: Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. (2010).
  45. Wilson, T.D., Dunn, D.S., Kraft, D., and Lisle, D.J. , “Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why We Feel the Way We Do,” In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 22. (Academic Press, 1989), 287-343.
  46. Xiong, H., Boyle, L.N., Moeckli, J., Dow, B.R. et al. , “Use Patterns among Early Adopters of Adaptive Cruise Control,” Human Factors 54(5):722-733, 2012.
  47. Yang, X.J., Unhelkar, V.V., and Shah, J.A. , “Evaluating Effects of User Experience and System Transparency on Trust in Automation,” in The 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’17), 2017, 408-416.

Cited By