This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Safety Evaluation of Directional Interchange with Semi-direct Ramp Connections and Loops
Journal Article
09-10-01-0005
ISSN: 2327-5626, e-ISSN: 2327-5634
Sector:
Citation:
Hamad, K. and Ismail, A., "Safety Evaluation of Directional Interchange with Semi-direct Ramp Connections and Loops," SAE Int. J. Trans. Safety 10(1):93-111, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4271/09-10-01-0005.
Language:
English
Abstract:
This article evaluates the safety of the Directional Interchange with Semi-Direct
Ramp Connection with Loops (DI-SDRL). Toward this end, the Federal Highway
Administration’s Interchange Safety Analysis Tool-Enhanced (ISATe) was utilized
to predict the safety performance of this interchange under 30 different
scenarios covering a wide range of traffic volumes. This interchange’s
performance has also been compared to a conventional one, i.e., Directional with
Loops Interchange (DLI), in terms of the percentage difference in predicted
crash frequencies and using the paired t-Test. The results showed that DI-SDRL
ramp segments witnessed a higher number of crashes than the DLI by an average of
36% and 37% for fatal-injury (FI) and property-damage-only (PDO) crashes,
respectively. The statistical t-Test results showed that the differences between
the two interchanges were statistically significant, except for the freeway
segments. On the other hand, the differences reported by crash type were not as
large as ramp segments. For example, the DI-SDRL reported a higher number of
multiple-vehicle (MV) crashes than the DLI by an average of 4% and 2% for FI and
PDO severity levels, respectively. As for the total single-vehicle (SV) crashes,
the DI-SDRL reported a higher number of crashes than the DLI by an average of 2%
for both FI and PDO severity levels. Nevertheless, the statistical t-Test
indicated that the difference between the studied interchanges is statistically
significant.