Open Access

Functional Modelling of Systems with Multiple Operation Modes: Case Study on an Active Spoiler System

Journal Article
06-14-03-0014
ISSN: 1946-3995, e-ISSN: 1946-4002
Published November 29, 2021 by SAE International in United States
Functional Modelling of Systems with Multiple Operation Modes: Case Study on an Active Spoiler System
Sector:
Citation: Yildirim, U. and Campean, F., "Functional Modelling of Systems with Multiple Operation Modes: Case Study on an Active Spoiler System," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 14(3):223-245, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4271/06-14-03-0014.
Language: English

References

  1. Hehenberger , P. , Vogel-Heuser , B. , Bradley , D. , Eynard , B. et al. Design, Modelling, Simulation and Integration of Cyber Physical Systems: Methods and Applications Comput Ind 82 2016 273 289 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.05.006
  2. Lindemann , U. , Maurer , M. , and Braun , T. Structural Complexity Management: An Approach for the Field of Product Design Berlin Springer Verlag 2009 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87889-6
  3. INCOSE 2007
  4. Yildirim , U. and Campean , F. Functional Modelling of Complex Multi-Disciplinary Systems Using the Enhanced Sequence Diagram Res Eng Design 31 2020 429 448 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-020-00343-8
  5. Liu , C. , Hildre , H.P. , Zhang , H. , and Rolvag , T. Conceptual Design of Multi-Modal Products Research in Engineering Design 26 3 2015 219 234 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-015-0193-0
  6. Goebel , R. , Sanfelice , R. , and Teel , A. Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Modeling, Stability, and Robustness Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press 2012 9780691153896
  7. Liu , C. , Hildre , H.P. , Zhang , H. , and Rolvag , T. Product Architecture Design of Multi-Modal Products Res Eng Design 27 2016 331 346 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0221-8
  8. Burkacky , O. , Deichmann , J. , and Stein , J.P. 2019 https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/mapping-the-automotive-software-and-electronics-landscape-through-2030
  9. Mokhtarian , H. , Coatanéa , E. , and Paris , H. Function Modeling Combined with Physics-Based Reasoning for Assessing Design Options and Supporting Innovative Ideation Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 31 4 2017 476 500 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060417000403
  10. Zhao , M. , Chen , Y. , Chen , L. , and Xie , Y. A State-Behavior-Function Model for Functional Modeling of Multi-State Systems Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 233 7 2019 2302 2317 https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406218791640
  11. Pahl , G. , Beitz , W. , Feldhusen , J. , and Grote , K.H. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach 3rd London Springer 2007 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2
  12. Campean , I. , Henshall , E. , and Rutter , B. Systems Engineering Excellence Through Design: An Integrated Approach Based on Failure Mode Avoidance SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 6 3 2013 389 401 https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0595
  13. Eigner , M. , Dickopf , T. , and Huwig , C. An Interdisciplinary Model Based Design Approach for Developing Cybertronic Systems the DESIGN Conference Dubrovnik, Croatia 16-19 2016 1647 1656
  14. Albers , A. , Rapp , S. , Spadinger , M. , Richter , T. et al. The Reference System in the Model of PGE: Proposing a Generalized Description of Reference Products and Their Interrelations Proc Design Soc Int Conf Eng Design 1 1 2019 1693 1702 https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.175
  15. Campean , F. , Delaux , D. , Sharma , S. , and Bridges , J. Reliability Research Roadmapping Workshop: Implications for Engineering Design DESIGN Conference 2020 Cavtat, Croatia 2020 https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2020.0000
  16. Schultz , J. , Sen , C. , Caldwell , B. , Mathieson , J. et al. Limitations to Function Structures: A Case Study in Morphing Airfoil Design Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 5: 22nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; Special Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise Montreal, Quebec, Canada 2010 405 417 ASME https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28559
  17. Stone , R.B. and Wood , K.L. Development of a Functional Basis for Design J Mech Des 122 2000 359 370 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1289637
  18. Ullman , D.G. The Mechanical Design Process 4th New York McGraw-Hill 2010
  19. Ulrich , K.T. and Eppinger , S.D. Product Design and Development 3rd New York McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2003
  20. Cross , N. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design 4th Chichester Wiley 2008
  21. Short , A.R. , Van Bossuty , D.L. Rerouting Failure Flow Using Logic Blocks in Functional Models for Improved System Robustness: Failure Flow Decision Functions Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15) Milan, Italy 2015
  22. Soria Zurita , N.F. , Stone , R.B. , Onan Demirel , H. , and Tumer , I.Y. Identification of Human-System Interaction Errors during Early Design Stages Using a Functional Basis Framework ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B: Mechanical Engineering 6 1 2020 011005 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044787
  23. Gill , A. , Summers , J. , and Turner , C. Comparing Function Structures and Pruned Function Structures for Market Price Prediction: An Approach to Benchmarking Representation Inferencing Value Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 31 4 2017 550 566 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060417000543
  24. OMG 2019 https://sysml.org/.res/docs/specs/OMGSysML-v1.6-19-11-01.pdf
  25. Albers , A. and Zingel , C. Challenges of Model-Based Systems Engineering: A Study towards Unified Term Understanding and the State of Usage of SysML Proceedings sf Smart Product Engineering: The 23th CIRP Design Conference Bochum, Germany 2013 83 92 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30817-8_9
  26. Barbieri , G. , Fantuzzi , C. , and Borsari , R. A Model-Based Design Methodology for the Development of Mechatronic Systems Mechatronics 24 7 2014 833 843 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.12.004
  27. Huldt , T. and Stenius , I. State-of-Practice Survey of Model-Based Systems Engineering Systems Engineering 22 2019 134 145 https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21466
  28. Friedenthal , S. , Moore , A. , and Steiner , R. A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language 2nd Burlington Morgan Kaufmann 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-14457-1
  29. Whittle , J. and Schumann , J. Generating Statechart Designs from Scenarios Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium Limerick, Ireland 2000 314 323 https://doi.org/10.1145/337180.337217
  30. Harel , D. , Kugler , H. , and Pnueli , A. Synthesis Revisited: Generating Statechart Models from Scenario-Based Requirements Kreowski , H.J. , Montanari , U. , Orejas , F. , Rozenberg , G. et al. Formal Methods in Software and Systems Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3393 Berlin Springer 2005 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31847-7_18
  31. Gronmo , R. and Moller-Pedersen , B. From Sequence Diagrams to State Machines by Graph Transformation Tratt , L. and Gogolla , M. Theory and Practice of Model Transformations. ICMT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6142 Berlin Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13688-7_7
  32. Piques , J.-D. SysML for Embedded Automotive Systems: SysCARS Methodology Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS2014) Toulouse, France
  33. Whittle , J. , Saboo , J. , and Kwan , R. From Scenarios to Code: An Air Traffic Control Case Study 25th International Conference on Software Engineering. Proceedings Portland, OR 2003 490 495 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201227
  34. Latronico , E. and Koopman , P. Representing Embedded System Sequence Diagrams as a Formal Language Gogolla , M. and Kobryn , C. “UML” 2001—The Unified Modeling Language. Modeling Languages, Concepts, and Tools. UML 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2185 Berlin Springer 2001
  35. Liang , H. , Dingel , J. and Diskin , Z. A Comparative Survey of Scenario-Based to State-Based Model Synthesis Approaches 5th International Workshop on Scenarios and State Machines, SCESM 2006
  36. Glinz , M. An Integrated Formal Model of Scenarios Based on Statecharts Schäfer , W. and Botella , P. Software Engineering—ESEC ’95. ESEC 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 989 Berlin Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60406-5_19
  37. Maier , T. and Zündorf , A. The Fujaba Statechart Synthesis Approach 2nd International Workshop on Scenarios and State Machines: Models, Algorithms, and Tools, ICSE Portland, Oregon 2003
  38. Vasilache , S. and Tanaka , J. Synthesis of State Machines from Multiple Interrelated Scenarios Using Dependency Diagrams Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics 3 3 2005 18 25 https://doi.org/10.1.1.113.8512
  39. Wei , B. , Delugach , H.S. , and Wang , Y. From State Diagrams to Sequence Diagrams: A Requirements Acquisition Approach International Journal of Computers and Applications 41 2 2019 89 111 https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2017.1408982
  40. Berkenkötter , K. Using UML 2.0 in Real-Time Development—A Critical Review SVERTS Workshop at the UML Conference 2003 https://www.verimag.imag.fr/EVENTS/2003/SVERTS/
  41. Roques , P. Systems Architecture Modeling with the Arcadia Method: A Practical Guide to Capella London ISTE Press 2018
  42. Mathworks System Composer™ User’s Guide (R2021b) The MathWorks, Inc. Apple Hill Drive Natick, MA 2021
  43. Yildirim , U. 2015
  44. Campean , F. and Yildirim , U. Enhanced Sequence Diagram for Function Modelling of Complex Systems Procedia CIRP 60 2017 273 278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.053
  45. Bolat , E. 2021 https://thenounproject.com/term/rear-spoiler-warning/457502/
  46. Barber , C.J. 2018
  47. Yildirim , U. , Campean , F. , and Williams , H. Function Modeling Using the System State Flow Diagram Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 31 4 2017 413 435 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060417000294
  48. Umeda , Y. , Ishii , M. , Yoshioka , M. , Shimomura , Y. et al. Supporting Conceptual Design Based on the Function-Behavior-State Modeller Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10 4 1996 275 288 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060400001621
  49. Uddin , A. , Campean , F. , and Khan , M.K. Application of the Interface Analysis Template for Deriving System Requirements Proceedings of International Design Conference (DESIGN) Dubrovnik, Croatia 2016 543 552
  50. INCOSE 2019
  51. Clausing , D.P. Operating Window: An Engineering Measure for Robustness Technometrics 46 1 2004 25 29 https://doi.org/10.1198/004017004000000077
  52. Davis , T.P. Science, Science, Engineering, and Statistics Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Ind. 22 5-6 2006 401 430
  53. Zhou , J. Reliability and Robustness Mindset in Automotive Product Development for Global Markets SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1212 2005 https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-1212
  54. Qamar , A. , Meinhart , M. , and Walley , G. Model Based Systems Engineering to Support Failure Mode Avoidance for Driver Assistance Systems 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2017 1 9 https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2017.7943639
  55. Shirvani , F. , Scott , W. , Kennedy , G.A.L. , and Campbell , A.P. Enhancement of FMEA Risk Assessment with SysML Australian Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Engineering 15 1 2019 52 61 https://doi.org/10.1080/14488388.2019.1664211
  56. Campean , F. , Yildirim , U. and Henshall , E. Synthesis of Functional Models from Use Cases Using the System State Flow Diagram: A Nested Systems Approach the 15th International Design Conference Dubrovnik, Croatia 2018 2833 2844 https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0543
  57. Campean , F. , Williams , H. , Uddin , A. , and Yildirim , U. Robust Engineering Systems Analysis through Failure Mode Avoidance, Short Course Lecture Notes Bradford, UK University of Bradford 2017
  58. Gu , P. , Hashemian , M. , and Nee , A.Y.C. Adaptable Design CIRP Annals 53 2 2004 539 557 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60028-6
  59. Zhang , J. , Chen , Y. , Xue , D. et al. Robust Design of Configurations and Parameters of Adaptable Products Front. Mech. Eng. 9 2014 1 14 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-014-0296-8
  60. Cong , J. , Chen , C.-H. , and Zheng , P. Design Entropy Theory: A New Design Methodology for Smart PSS Development Advanced Engineering Informatics 45 2020 101124 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101124

Cited By