This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Software Reliability Program Implementation Guide
- Aerospace Standard
- JA1003_200401
- Issued
Downloadable datasets available
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Issuing Committee:
Language:
English
Scope
This document provides methods and techniques for implementing a reliability program throughout the full life cycle of a software product, whether the product is considered as standalone or part of a system. This document is the companion to the Software Reliability Program Standard [JA1002]. The Standard describes the requirements of a software reliability program to define, meet, and demonstrate assurance of software product reliability using a Plan-Case framework and implemented within the context of a system application.
This document has general applicability to all sectors of industry and commerce and to all types of equipment whose functionality is to some degree implemented by software components. It is intended to be guidance for business purposes and should be applied when it provides a value-added basis for the business aspects of development, use, and sustainment of software whose reliability is an important performance parameter. Applicability of specific practices will depend on the reliability-significance of the software, application domain, and life cycle stage of the software.
Following guidelines in this document does not guarantee required reliability will be achieved, or that any certification authority will accept the results as sufficient evidence that requisite reliability has been achieved. Following guidelines in this document will provide insight into what level of reliability has been achieved. With proper customer, certification authority, and supplier negotiation and interaction in accordance with these guidelines, it is more likely that the achieved reliability will be acceptable.
Recommended Content
Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
TABLE 1 | DOCUMENT ROADMAP TO TOPICS OF INTEREST | |
Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
TABLE 2 | EXAMPLE DEFECTS AND REMOVAL EFFICIENCY PROFILES | |
TABLE 3 | EXAMPLE DEFECT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY, DELIVERED DEFECTS FOR APPLICATIONS | |
TABLE 4 | PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED DEFECT DENSITY | |
TABLE 5 | EXAMPLE RELIABILITY FAILURE MEASURES BY APPLICATION TYPE | |
TABLE 6 | EXAMPLE FORMAT FOR SUMMARY OF SOFTWARE RELIABILITY CASE EVIDENCE | |
TABLE 6 | EXAMPLE FORMAT FOR SUMMARY OF SOFTWARE RELIABILITY CASE EVIDENCE | |
TABLE 8 | MAJOR SURETY THEMES | |
TABLE 9 | SECURITY PRINCIPLES AND ASSOCIATED SURETY THEME | |
TABLE 10 | EXAMPLE RELIABILITY DATA FOR THE AIAA REPOSITORY | |
TABLE A1 | CHARACTERIZATION OF STANDARDS AND RELATIONSHIP TO SOFTWARE RELIABILITY | |
Unnamed Dataset 13 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 14 | ||
TABLE C1 | TECHNIQUES TO ACHIEVE AND ASSESS SOFTWARE RELIABILITY BY LIFE CYCLE PHASE | |
TABLE C2 | DEFECT ORIGIN AND REMOVAL EFFICIENCY METRICS | |
TABLE C3 | DEFECT POTENTIAL AND REMOVAL EFFICIENCY BY QUALITY LEVEL | |
TABLE C4 | DEFECT DENSITY RANGES BY SEI CMM LEVEL | |
TABLE C5 | COMMON SOFTWARE RELIABILITY ESTIMATION MODELS | |
TABLE D1 | FONE FOLLOWER OPERATIONAL PROFILE | |
TABLE E1 | LOFI SCORING TABLE | |
TABLE E2 | LOFI CATEGORIES: HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW | |
TABLE E3 | DO178B POSSIBLE DELIVERABLES | |
TABLE E4 | EXAMPLE SOFTWARE RELIABILITY PLAN COMPLIANCE MATRIX | |
TABLE E5 | EXAMPLE EVIDENCE: FORMAL INSPECTIONS | |
TABLE E6 | EXAMPLE EVIDENCE: SYSTEM/INTEGRATION TEST DATA | |
TABLE E7 | EXAMPLE EVIDENCE: INSPECTIONS, TESTING, DEFECT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY | |
TABLE E8 | EXAMPLE EVIDENCE: PREDICTED RELIABILITY CALCULATIONS | |
TABLE E9 | EXAMPLE EVIDENCE: ESTIMATED RELIABILITY CALCULATIONS | |
TABLE E10 | EXAMPLE EVIDENCE: FAA AND NSIA PRODUCT REVIEWS |
Issuing Committee
Reference
* Redlines comparisons are available for those standards
listed in the Revision History that contain a radio button. A
redline comparison of the current version against a revision is
accomplished by selecting the radio button next to the standard and
then selecting 'compare'. At this time, Redline versions only exist
for some AMS standards. SAE will continue to add redline versioning
with ongoing updates to SAE MOBILUS.