This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
GUIDELINES AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING THE SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCESS ON CIVIL AIRBORNE SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT
- Aerospace Standard
- ARP4761
- Issued
Downloadable datasets available
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Issuing Committee:
Language:
English
Scope
This document describes guidelines and methods of performing the safety assessment for certification of civil aircraft. It is primarily associated with showing compliance with FAR/JAR 25.1309. The methods outlined here identify a systematic means, but not the only means, to show compliance. A subset of this material may be applicable to non-25.1309 equipment. The concept of Aircraft Level Safety Assessment is introduced and the tools to accomplish this task are outlined. The overall aircraft operating environment is considered.
When aircraft derivatives or system changes are certified, the processes described herein are usually applicable only to the new designs or to existing designs that are affected by the changes. In the case of the implementation of existing designs in a new derivation, alternate means such as service experience may be used to show compliance.
Recommended Content
Aerospace Standard | Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems |
Aerospace Standard | Aircraft Lightning Zone |
Aerospace Standard | User’s Manual for Certification of Aircraft Electrical/Electronic Systems for the Indirect Effects of Lightning |
Topic
Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 5 | ||
TABLE 1 | Failure Condition Severity as Related to Probability Objectives and Assurance Levels | |
TABLE A1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 8 | ||
TABLE D1 | Examples of FTA Boundaries | |
TABLE D2 | Sources of Top Level Events | |
TABLE D3 | Examples of Undesired Event Statements | |
TABLE D4 | Summary of Qualitative Versus Quantitative FTA Evaluation Techniques and Results | |
TABLE D5 | Pictorial Representation of Average Probability Calculation for a Two Failure Case - One Latent and One Active | |
Unnamed Dataset 14 | ||
TABLE D6 | Example of a System Indenture Level FTA Data Summary Chart | |
TABLE D7 | Example of an LRU Indenture Level FTA Data Summary Chart | |
TABLE F1 | Definitions of Terms Used in Markov Analysis | |
Unnamed Dataset 18 | ||
TABLE G1 | Functional FMEA Worksheet | |
TABLE G2 | Piece-Part FMEA Worksheet | |
TABLE H1 | FMES Worksheet | |
TABLE K1 | Example of a General Common Mode Types, Sources and Failures/Errors Checklist | |
Unnamed Dataset 23 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 24 |
Issuing Committee
S-18 Aircraft and Sys Dev and Safety Assessment Committee
The SAE S-18 Committee is active in the development of guidelines, including processes, methods and tools, to accomplish safety assessment of airplanes and related systems and equipment.
Reference
Number | Title |
---|---|
AC25.19 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
ARP4754 | Certification Considerations for Highly-Integrated Or Complex Aircraft Systems |
FAR25.1309 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
MIL-HDBK-217 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
MIL-HDBK-338 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
MIL-HDBK-978 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
RTCA/DO-178 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
* Redlines comparisons are available for those standards
listed in the Revision History that contain a radio button. A
redline comparison of the current version against a revision is
accomplished by selecting the radio button next to the standard and
then selecting 'compare'. At this time, Redline versions only exist
for some AMS standards. SAE will continue to add redline versioning
with ongoing updates to SAE MOBILUS.