This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Acceptance of Nonplanar Rearview Mirrors by U.S. Drivers
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Five different nonplanar mirrors were evaluated as driver-side rearview mirrors in a field test using Ford employees. Two were spherical convex (differing in radius of curvature), and three were aspheric (differing primarily in the proportion of their surfaces over which radius of curvature was variable). Each participant drove for four weeks with one of the nonplanar mirrors. At three times during the test the participants filled out questionnaires concerning their experience with the mirrors. Driver preferences for the experimental mirrors increased moderately between surveys at one week and at four weeks. At four weeks, all five nonplanar mirrors were preferred to the standard flat mirror by at least a small amount. For each of the five mirror designs there was a large range of opinion. Most notably, a small number of people strongly disliked the aspheric design that involved the largest variable-radius area. These results indicate that nonplanar mirrors are likely to be welcomed by a large number of U.S. drivers, but some designs seem more acceptable than others, and for almost any design there may be a small but significant number of drivers who strongly prefer planar mirrors. The sample in this study had a limited range of subject ages, a relatively small number of females, and may have been biased toward people who have generally positive attitudes toward new technologies. The results should therefore be considered preliminary.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Flannagan, C. and Flannagan, M., "Acceptance of Nonplanar Rearview Mirrors by U.S. Drivers," SAE Technical Paper 980919, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/980919.Also In
References
- Andre, A. D. Wickens, C. D. 1995 October When users want what's not best for them Ergonomics in Design 10 14
- Flannagan, M. J. Sivak, M. 1996 Workshop on rearview mirror human factors research needs: Summary of recommendations Ann Arbor The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
- Luoma, J. Sivak, M. Flannagan, M. J. 1995 Effects of driver-side mirror type on lane-change accidents Ergonomics 38 1973 1978
- Olson, P. L. Winkler, C. B. 1985 Measurement of crash avoidance characteristics of vehicles in use Ann Arbor The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
- Pilhall, S. 1981 Improved rearward view SAE Technical Paper Series No. 810759 Warrendale, Pennsylvania Society of Automotive Engineers
- Preamble to an amendment to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 111 1982
- Schumann, J. Sivak, M. Flannagan, M. J. 1998 Are driver-side convex mirrors helpful or harmful? International journal of Vehicle Design 19 29 40