This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
1997 UTEP LPP-FI Propane Challenge Vehicle
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
As part of the 1997 Propane Vehicle Challenge, a team of twelve UTEP students converted a 1996 Dodge Grand Caravan with a 3.3 L V6 engine to dedicated Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) operation according to the 1997 Propane Vehicle Challenge (PVC) competition rules (16). The 1997 UTEP team developed an LPG liquid phase port fuel injection (LPP-FI) system for the minivan. The UTEP design strategy combines simplicity and sound engineering practices with the effective use of heat resistant materials to maintain the LPG in the liquid phase at temperatures encountered in the fuel delivery system.
The team identified two options for fuel storage with in-tank fuel pumps. The competition vehicle incorporates a five-manifold eight inch diameter Sleegers Engineering LPG tank fitted with a Walbro LPTS in-tank pump system, providing a calculated range of 310 city miles and 438 highway miles. UTEP team members collaborated with Sleegers Engineering for the tank design, providing input on tank size, location, and Walbro LPTS flange specification. An independent fuel delivery and return system was developed to provide equal fuel delivery to each cylinder, and to eliminate heat transfer problems associated with a single metallic fuel rail. Care was taken to minimize the number and size of metallic fittings in the fuel delivery and return system so as to minimize heat transfer to the LPG. Prototype Siemens DEKA II LPG fuel injectors are housed in in-house manufactured Nylon-6 injector holders placed in the original fuel injector locations with only slight modification to the intake manifold. To remove heat transferred to the LPG during fuel delivery, a novel electronically-controlled thermoelectric heat pump heat exchanger was developed and placed in the fuel return line. The stock Powertrain Control Module (PCM) is retained for all engine management. To account for LPG, the MAP sensor voltage is modified prior to being sent to the PCM. This serves to decrease the amount of fuel delivered per injection and increase the spark timing advance, both of which are beneficial for LPG. A resistor is placed in parallel with the engine coolant temperature sensor to eliminate cold start fuel enrichment, which is not required for LPG.
The UTEP vehicle provides an excellent demonstration of the benefits derived from the LPP-FI system. Although the system could be further optimized for dedicated LPG (e.g. increased compression ratio, optimized EGR schedule, optimized transmission shift schedule, etc.), our system demonstrates benefits derived from a low-cost conversion of a gasoline vehicle, which is of benefit to OEM vehicle manufacturers and the aftermarket alternative fuels industry.
Recommended Content
Aerospace Standard | Heater and Accessories, Aircraft Internal Combustion Heat Exchanger Type |
Technical Paper | Fuel System Pressure Control Improves NGV Performance |
Technical Paper | The Spontaneous Ignition of Isooctane Air Mixtures under Steady Flow Conditions |
Authors
- E. Acedo - The University of Texas at El Paso
- O. Acosta - The University of Texas at El Paso
- A. Angulo - The University of Texas at El Paso
- O. Enriquez - The University of Texas at El Paso
- H. K. Krishnaswamy - The University of Texas at El Paso
- R. Loya - The University of Texas at El Paso
- J. Perez - The University of Texas at El Paso
- S. A. Olson - The University of Texas at El Paso
- V. Saenz - The University of Texas at El Paso
- F. Vega - The University of Texas at El Paso
- J. A. Villalobos - The University of Texas at El Paso
- B. Worth - The University of Texas at El Paso
- M. C. Robbins - The University of Texas at El Paso
- R. B. Wicker - The University of Texas at El Paso
Topic
Citation
Acedo, E., Acosta, O., Angulo, A., Enriquez, O. et al., "1997 UTEP LPP-FI Propane Challenge Vehicle," SAE Technical Paper 980490, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/980490.Also In
References
- Wicker, R.B. Holloway D.G. Olson S.A. Villalobos J.A. “The UTEP Chupacabra Vehicle: Design and Development, and the 1996 Propane Vehicle Challenge Results,” SAE SP-1257 Propane Vehicle Conversion: The 1996 Propane Vehicle Challenge 1997
- Matthews, R.D. Chiu J. Zheng J. Wu D.-Y. Dardalis D. Hall M.J. Ellzey J.E. Mock C. Love G. “1995 Annual Report-The Texas Project: Light duty vehicle conversions to natural gas and liquefied pertroleum gas,” Combustion and Engines Research Program Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712 1996
- Matthews, R.D. Chiu J. Zheng J. Wu D.-Y. Dardalis D. Shen K. Roberts C. Hall M.J. Ellzey J.L. Mock C. Wicker R.B. Jaeger S. “The Texas Project: Part 1 - Emissions and Fuel Economy of Aftermarket CNG and LPG Conversions of Light-Duty Vehicles,” SAE Paper 962098 SAE SP-1208 “Topics in Alternative Fuels and Their Emissions” 1996
- Chiu, J. Matthews R.D. “The Texas Project: Part 2 - Control System Characteristics of Aftermarket CNG and LPG Conversions for Light-Duty Vehicles,” SAE Paper 962099 SAE SP-1208 “Topics in Alternative Fuels and Their Emissions” 1996
- Wu, D.-Y Matthews R.D. Zheng J. Shen K. Chiu J. Mock C. Jaeger S. “The Texas Project: Part 3 - Off-Cycle Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles Operating on CNG, LPG, Federal Phase 1 Reformulated Gasoline, and/or Low Sulfur Certification Gasoline,” SAE Paper 962100 SAE SP-1208 “Topics in Alternative Fuels and Their Emissions”
- Kavarnos Manos Dockland Science Park, Australia 1997
- “LPG Liquid Injection,” Technical Manual Liquiphase Management Pty. Ltd. Australia November 1993
- Sierens, R. “An Experimental and Theoretical Study of Liquid- LPG Injection,” SAE Paper No. 922363 Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale PA 1992
- Stanglmaier, R. Walls M. et al. “Design and Development of the University of Texas at Austin's 1996 Propane Vehicle Challenge Entry,”
- Stanglmaier, R. “Development of a Liquid Phase Propane (LPP) Injected Vehicle at The University of Texas-Austin,” Propane Vehicle September 1996
- Maxwell T.T. Jones J.C. Alternative Fuels-Emissions, Economics, and Performance Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Pennsylvania 1995
- Wicker, R.B. Robbins M.C. “Final Project Report-1996 UTEP Propane Challenge Vehicle: Design and Development, Competition Results, and Impact on Educational Programs,” Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, The University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, Texas August 1996
- Heywood, J.B. Internal Combustion Engines McGraw-Hill New York, NY 1988
- Ferguson, C.R. Internal Combustion Engines-Applied Thermosciences John Wiley & Sons New York 1986
- Matthews, R.D. Internal Combustion Engines and Automotive Engineering Harper-Collins 1997
- “1997 Propane Vehicle Challenge Competition Rules and Regulations,” Argonne National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Research Argonne, IL 60439 January 1997