This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Models for Detection of Highway Obstacles with Headlamps
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Models using contrast as the measure of discernibility or detection of roadway obstacle on non-lighted roadways have not recognized the lighting effects caused by the lateral spacing of headlamps on the vehicle. When the only significant sources of roadway light are a vehicle's headlamps, shadows on the roadway behind and to the left and right of the obstacle are viewed simultaneously with the obstacle itself. It can be shown that in certain obstacle-sighting situations, where there is little or no significant background light from sources other than the headlamps themselves, sufficient contrast is provided by the shadow outlines. Shadows created by the lateral spacing of the headlamp light sources and the driver's eyepoint, framing one or both sides of the obstacle, serve to outline the illuminated obstacle on the roadway in front of a vehicle. In the context of detecting a roadway obstacle, the contrast requirements are satisfied (or obviated) and threshold luminance becomes a relevant measure of obstacle discernibility. Comparison of the results of field experiments with the predictions of both contrast predictive and luminance predictive models shows that, within the limits of the situations tested, the luminance model gives a better measure of detection distance and obstacle luminance at detection.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Simulating Headlamp Illumination Using Photometric Light Clusters |
Technical Paper | Vehicle Lighting to Enhance Pedestrian Visibility |
Technical Paper | The Smart Headlamp System with Variable Low-Beam Pattern |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Kosmatka, W., "Comparison of Models for Detection of Highway Obstacles with Headlamps," SAE Technical Paper 970911, 1997, https://doi.org/10.4271/970911.Also In
References
- Blackwell, H.R. 1952 Brightness Discrimination Data for the Specification of Quantity of Illumination Illuminating Engineering 47 602 609
- Janoff, M. 1993 Visibility vs. response distance: a comparison of two experiments and the implications of their results J of the IES Winter 1993 3 12
- Huculak, P. 1978 A Visibility Analysis of Obstacle Detection Experimentation in Opposed Automotive Headlighting May 1978
- Versace, J. Driver Vision Report # SAE 700391 Warrendale, Pennsylvania Society of Automotive Engineers
- Olson, P.L. Aoki, T. Battle, D. Flannagan, M. 1990 Development of a Headlight Performance Evaluation Tool Ann Arbor, Michigan University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
- Meese G.E. Westlake P.E. 1971 Key Factors in Evaluating Headlighting Systems December 1971 Barcelona, Spain
- Mortimer, R.G. Olson, P.L. Development and Use of Driving Tests to Evaluate Headlamp Beams Ann Arbor, Michigan University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
- Kosmatka, W.J. 1995 Obstacle detection rationale for vehicle headlamps J of the IES Winter 1995 24 1 36 40
- Hills, B.L. 1976 Visibility under night driving conditions, part 3,derivation of (delta L, A) characteristics and factors in their application Ltg Res & Techno1 8 ll 26