This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Roof-Crush Strength Improvement Using Rigid Polyurethane Foam
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Rigid, polyurethane foam filling is currently being used for NVH (Noise, Vibration and Harshness) improvement in many automobiles The improvement is typically achieved by the injection of the rigid polyurethane foam into the thin-walled, hollow sections of the body members such as the pillars and rocker panels The foam seals the cavities thereby blocking the transmission and amplification of wind, engine and road noises Also by increasing the stiffness of the members and the joints, the body natural frequencies are increased thereby reducing the vibration
Another potential application of the rigid polyurethane foam is strength improvement of the body structures Thin-walled, hollow sections are inherently susceptible to buckling due to section collapse When filled with the rigid polyurethane foam, the section collapse can be significantly reduced thereby increasing the strength of such structures, in addition to the demonstrated NVH improvement
Bending tests (4-point) of foam-filled steel sections were performed to show the effectiveness of various densities of foam in improving the strength in the flexural mode These tests were replicated in nonlinear finite element simulations to establish the appropriate material characteristics including fracture properties Additionally, these tests served to identify the appropriate density range for roof-crush strength improvement Subsequently, nonlinear finite element analyses were performed to simulate the roof crush test per FMVSS 216 (Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards) at the A-pillar roof joint The study shows that the strength can be improved substantially by using rigid polyurethane foam By using foam, it is possible to reduce the pillar sections, reduce the thicknesses or eliminate reinforcements inside the pillars and thereby offset the mass increase due to the foam filling Also, a possible design concept utilizing the foam filling in a B-pillar that could meet the interior head impact requirements (per the FMVSS 201 Head Impact Protection upgrade) is presented
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Lilley, K. and Mani, A., "Roof-Crush Strength Improvement Using Rigid Polyurethane Foam," SAE Technical Paper 960435, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/960435.Also In
References
- Art Goldman and Kurt Lilley “NVH Improvement with Two-Component Polyurethane Foam,” Automotive Body Interior & Safety Systems IBEC Sep 26-29 1994
- “Big Wheels Keep on Rolling,” Automotive Industries Magazine 42 October 1988
- “Auto/Steel Partnership HSS Stamping and Design Manual Supplement,” Auto/Steel Partnership, Ford High Strength Steel (HSS) Industry Resource Group Joint Stiffness Study, Mike Jensen, Ford, Chairman 1996
- “Rollover Roof Crush Study,” Final Report submitted to NHTSA by EASi Engineering, Contract No DTNH22-92-D-07323, Project No NRD-01-2-07387 June 1993
- Infiniti Q45 Function Brochure 94 100 1993
- LS-DYNA3D Users Manual Livermore Software Technology Corporation 1994
- Properties of Rigid Urethane Foams Dupont Hylene Organic Isocyanate Bulletin E-08934 Wilmington, DE 1992
- FMVSS Head Impact Protection, Final Rule Federal Register 60 160 August 18 1995
- “Cost and Leadtime Estimates for Improved Pillar Padding, Automatic Slack Adjusters, Visual Brake Adjustment Indicators and Tractor/Trailer ABS Connections,” Final Report, Contract # DTNH22-90-02001 Engineering Analysis Services, Inc and Pioneer Engineering and Manufacturing Co January 31 1991