This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Sulfur Effects on California OBD-II Systems
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
California cars operating on higher-sulfur gasolines than prevalent in California should not result in “false tripping” of the on-board catalyst monitoring system. The monitoring systems to be used on California low-emission vehicles will be unable to detect the small extra amount of loss in catalyst effectiveness that might be caused by higher sulfur levels outside of California. Testing of a mocked-up ultra low-emission vehicle (ULEV) conducted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) confirms that on-board monitoring systems are not tripped even by high sulfur levels (800 ppm). An independent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assessment also agrees that “false tripping” of monitoring systems of the California cars is not expected to be a problem either for California cars operated temporarily outside of California or for California-type cars sold in other states.
However, future evolutions of the provisions in the monitoring regulation and in the technology of catalysts and monitoring systems might affect these conclusions somewhat, especially for cars meeting ULEV standards. The regulatory provisions and the hardware capabilities must continue to be matched, as they are at present, to avoid the potential for “false tripping” of the catalyst monitor.
In general, the issue of sulfur levels should be regarded more broadly than one of false tripping of on-board monitoring systems. Fuel suppliers, automakers, and regulatory agencies need to work together to balance catalyst costs and fuel costs, and to arrive at approaches that deliver the emissions reductions needed to meet air quality objectives in the most cost efficient manner. The optimization should consider catalyst system costs, performance and costs of on-board monitoring systems and inspection and maintenance (I&M) programs, and costs of gasoline. At present, on-board diagnostic (OBD) tripping does not appear to be the most important factor affecting the balance.
Recommended Content
Topic
Citation
Browning, L. and Moyer, C., "Sulfur Effects on California OBD-II Systems," SAE Technical Paper 952422, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/952422.Also In
References
- Albu, S. Kao L. Cackette T. “The Effectiveness of the California Low-Emission Vehicle Program,” AWMA paper 92-168.01 1992
- California Air Resources Board Mail Out 94-38 “Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Technical Status and Proposed Revisions to Malfunction and Diagnostic System Requirements for 1994 Model-Year Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium Duty Vehicles and Engines (OBD II),” October 11 1994
- Conversations with Gary Dolce, Todd Sherwood, Kenneth Zerafa, and Line Wehrly of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources October 1994
- Section 1968.1 of Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations
- Beckwith, P. Bennett P.J. Goodfellow C.L. Brisley R.J. Wilkins A. “The Effect of Three-Way Catalyst Formulation of Sulphur Tolerance and Emissions from Gasoline Fuelled Vehicles,” SAE Paper 940310 1994
- Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program “Effects of Fuel Sulfur on Mass Exhaust Emissions, Air Toxics and Reactivity,” Technical Bulletin No. 8 1993
- Allied Signal “Fuel Sulfur Effects on Automotive Catalyst Performance,” SAE paper 920558 1992
- Conversation with Dr. Tim Truex of Johnson Mathey October 1994
- Conversation with Dr. Heintz Robota of Allied Signal October 1994
- Conversations with Steve Albu, Mike McCarthy, and Allen Lyons of California Air Resources Board October-December 1994
- Punke, A. Dahle U. Tauster S.J. Rabinowitz H.N. Yarmada T. “Trimetallic Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Paper 950255 1995
- Monroe, D.R. Krueger M.H. Upton D.J. “The Effect of Sulfur on Three-Way Catalysts,” GM Report GMR-7135 August 1990
- Ozone Transport Commission “Low Emission Vehicle Program for the Northeast Ozone Transport Region-Summary and Analysis of Comments,” December 1994
- Beck, D.D. Silvis T.W. Mahan S.T. Impact of Fuel Sulfur on OBD-11 Catalyst Monitoring Using the Dual Oxygen Sensor Approach,” SAE Paper 941054 1994
- Beck, D.D. Short W.A. Angelos T.E. Dils R.R. IM240 Emission Tests with a 2.2 L Corsica TLEV,” SAE Paper 942001 1994
- American Honda Motor Company News Release “Honda First to have Gasoline Engine Verified at ULEV Exhaust Levels,” January 6 1995