This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Evaluation of Various Yield Criteria in LS-DYNA3D for Sheet Forming Application for Aluminum
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Finite element modeling of sheet forming processes for complex automotive parts using an explicit dynamic code such as LS-DYNA3D is increasingly used for producibility analysis and die development. In modeling sheet metal forming processes, it is very common to represent material behavior by either Von Mises' or Hill's yield criterion using commercial finite element codes. However, these criteria do not provide an accurate representation of aluminum alloys. Recently, a new yield criterion proposed by Barlat has been incorporated into LS-DYNA3D to describe the anisotropic material behavior of aluminum alloys. This paper examines the influence of Von Mises', Hill's (1948) and Barlat's yield criteria on the FEM simulation results for the deep drawing of a square cup and cylindrical cup for aluminum alloys. The sensitivity of predicted results to yield criteria is examined for deformation behavior, strain localization and potential of wrinkling. As expected, Barlat's yield criterion provides better agreement with the experimental results. Strain distribution is significantly different using these three criteria. Barlat's yield criterion shows higher strain localization and higher forming strains than Von Mises' and Hill's yield criteria.
Citation
Shah, K. and Dick, R., "Evaluation of Various Yield Criteria in LS-DYNA3D for Sheet Forming Application for Aluminum," SAE Technical Paper 950925, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/950925.Also In
References
- Schweizerhof, K. Hallquist J. O. “Explicit Time Integration and Contact Formulations for Thin Sheet Metal Forming,” Proc. VDI Conf. on: FE-Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes in Automotive Industry Zurich, Switzerland 1991
- Mattisson, K. et al. “Evaluation of a Dynamic Approach Using Explicit Integration in 3D Sheet Forming Simulation,” Proc. Conf. NUMIFORM'92 on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes 221 1992
- Aita, S. et al. “Industrial Products Formability Analysis Using 3D Sheet Metal Forming Simulation,” Proc. Conf. NUMIFORM'92 on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes 397 1992
- Hosford, W. F. “Limitation of Non-Quadratic Anisotropic Yield Criteria and Their Use in Analysis of Sheet Forming,” IDDRG (International Deep Drawing Research Group) Proceedings on Controlling Sheet Metal Forming Processes 163 1988
- Barlat, F. “Crystallographic Texture, Anisotropic Yield Suyrfaces and Forming Limits of Sheet Metal,” Matl. Sci. Eng. 91 55 72 1987
- Chu, E. “Generalization of Hill's 1979 Anisotropic Yield Criteria,” Proc. Conf. NUMISHEET'93 on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes-Verification of Simulation with Experiments 199 1993
- Barlat, F. et al. “A Six-Component Yield Function for Anisotropic Materiels,” Int. J. Plasticity 7 693 1991
- Chung, K. Shah K. “Finite Element Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming for Planar Anisotropic Metals,” Int. J. Plasticity 8 453 1992
- Hallquist, J. O. “Improved Simulation of Thin Sheet Metal Forming Using LS-DYNA3D on Parallel Computers,” Proc. Conf. NUMISHEET'93 on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes-Verification of Simulation with Experiments 137 1993
- NUMISHEET'93 Conference Proceedings on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes-Verification of Simulation with Experiments 274 1993
- Nakamachi, E. “Sheet Forming Process Characterization by Static-Explicit Anisotropic Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Simulation,” Proc. Conf. NUMISHEET'93 on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes-Verification of Simulation with Experiments 109 1993