This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Protection of Drivers and Spectators from Pit Entrance Injuries Incurred During Loss of Control Accidents
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
At Indianapolis Motor Speedway (IMS), as well as at a large number of other tracks and temporary racing circuits, the pit lane is separated from the racing surface itself by a wall. The wall is intended to reduce the dangers to pit crew members, spectators and racers themselves, and to prevent interaction between racing and pitted cars.
We examine the effectiveness of an attenuation device placed at the head end of the pit wall at IMS. Calculations are presented which show that the device can reduce the potential for injury to drivers by absorbing kinetic energy, by distributing the impact load over a large car area and by reducing and smoothing the acceleration pulse presented to the driver. Because driver restraint systems are not designed for high-g lateral loading, this attenuation represents a real safety feature in the case of a sliding situation. The device itself was (inadvertently) tested by a NASCAR vehicle during a practice session at IMS. Through a video analysis and data acquired from timing devices imbedded in the track surface, the accident was reconstructed and the wall attenuation device performance was compared to expected results. A simple calculation addresses the potential for ablative or nonablative padding of the entire wall surface of a complete race-track such as IMS. Energies involved, nominal material sizes needed, and a discussion of the qualitative effects of a wall contact are presented. Two types of wall contact can be considered, (a) a brush-by or wall sideswipe accident, in which the vehicle velocity vector is nearly parallel to the wall surface, and (b) an impact where the velocity vector is at a significant angle with respect to the wall (but still at an acute angle). The impossibility of a “head-on” collision at IMS, or at nearly every other racing venue, is shown. Worst-case scenarios were evaluated at IMS.
Spectator and pit crew safety were addressed. The potential for launching a car upward and out over the actual racing surface, or into the pits, or even into the spectator stands is discussed and shown to be very small. The attenuator device was specially designed and constructed to minimize this possibility, and the construction techniques used are presented. Although the single accident which occurred was a (relatively) low-speed accident, results were promising in view of what was expected.
Finally, a series of 1/8 scale radio-controlled model vehicle experiments were conducted against prototypical wall padding materials for estimation of potential for bounceback of vehicles into the racing stream. Photographs and video of the contacts are available, and a cataloging of results is presented.
The results reported here on attenuation devices are applicable to all racing locations where pit walls are employed, and the final section of the paper has relevance for all tracks where car-to-wall contacts are possible and/or likely.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Elementary Analysis of Race Circuit Barrier Placement |
Technical Paper | An Improved Side Impact Model for Use on Micro Computers |
Technical Paper | Automotive Seat Suspension Model for Ride Quality Studies |
Authors
Citation
Forbes, K. and Metz, L., "Protection of Drivers and Spectators from Pit Entrance Injuries Incurred During Loss of Control Accidents," SAE Technical Paper 942468, 1994, https://doi.org/10.4271/942468.Also In
References
- ASTM D 1566-78 37 American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia, PA, USA 1962
- Pleck, M. H. Metz, L. D. Conry, T. F. “The Use of Decelerative Metal Cutting in the Design of Energy Management Systems Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Ind . 97 3 867 872 1975
- “Foamed Plastics,” Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology 3rd. 11 0-471-02064-8 989 99 1980
- Rehkopf et al. “Standard Semirigid Polyurethane Foam Specimens: Size Effect on Compression Response,” J. Cellular Plastics 30 1 34 43 1994
- Phillips, T. L. Lannon, D. A. J. Br. Plast . 34 236 1961
- Andretti, M. Personal Conversation With The Authors 1993
- Metz, L. D. Metz, L. G. Forbes, K. H. Pfieffer, W. E., III “Collision Research at Indianapolis Motor Speedway,” SAE Paper No. 930998 1993
- Forbes, K. H Metz, L. D. “Analysis of 1994 Indianapolis 500 Mile Race and Practice Accidents.” SAE Paper No. 942480
- “Safety Criteria for Motor Racing Courses: A Study by the Safety Commission,” FIA 8 Place de la Concorde, Paris 1987