This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Perceptual Biases in Spatial Judgements as a Function of Eyepoint Elevation Angle and Geometric Field of View
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
This study investigated perceptual biases in spatial judgments as a function of the computer graphics eyepoint elevation, monoscopic or stereoscopic display, and target cube location. The display for this experiments consisted of two computer-generated cubes located above a grid plane with drop lines to the display surface. The experiment task consisted of judging azimuth and elevation angles between the target and reference cubes. The results indicated that azimuth errors varied with eyepoint elevation and were maximized at the - 15 degree eyepoint, elevation errors were worse using the 75 degree eyepoint, and binocular disparity did not aid judgments of azimuth and elevation.
Topic
Citation
Hendrix, C. and Barfield, W., "Perceptual Biases in Spatial Judgements as a Function of Eyepoint Elevation Angle and Geometric Field of View," SAE Technical Paper 941441, 1994, https://doi.org/10.4271/941441.Also In
References
- McGreevy, M.W. Ellis, S. R. 1986 The effect of perspective geometry on judged spatial information instruments Human Factors Vol. 28 439 456
- Barfield, W. Lim, R. Rosenberg, C. 1990 Visual enhancements and geometric field of view as factors in the design of a three-dimensional perspective display Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting 1470 1473
- Yeh, Y. Silverstein, L. D. 1992 Spatial judgments with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays Human Factors Vol. 34 583 600
- Rosenberg, C. Barfield, W. 1994 Skewness as a function of geometric parameters of perspective IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
- Wickens, C. D. 1992 Engineering Psychology and Human Performance HarperCollins Publishers Inc. New York 116 160
- Ellis, S. Tharp, G. Grunwald, A. Smith, S. 1991 Exocentric judgments in real environments and stereoscopic displays Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting 1442 1446
- Kim, W. S. Ellis, S. R. Tyler, M.E. Hannaford, B. Stark, L.W. 1987 Quantitative evaluation of perspective and stereoscopic displays in three-axis manual tracking tasks IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Vol. SMC-17 1 61 71
- Wickens, C. D. Todd, S. Seidler, K. 1989 Three dimensional displays: Perception, implementation, and applications (CSERIAC SOAR - 89-01) Wright-Patterson AFB, OH Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory
- Barfield, W. Rosenberg, C. 1994 Stereoscopic versus perspective display formats for judgments of spatial information Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Washington
- Buffett, A. R. 1980 The visual perception of depth using electro-optical display systems Displays April 39-45
- Bemis, S. V. Leeds, J. L. Winer, E. A. 1988 Operator performance as a function of type of display: conventional versus perspective Human Factors Vol. 30 163 169