This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Influence of Seatback Angle on Occupant Dynamics in Simulated Rear-End Impacts
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Event:
Stapp Car Crash Conference
Language:
English
Abstract
In the early 1980's a series of tests was conducted simulating rear-end crashes. The tests demonstrated that a conventional automotive bucket seat adequately retains an unbelted dummy on the seat for rear-end impacts up to 6.4 m/s and 9.5 g severity. For this severity of impact the total rearward rotation of the seatback is less than 60° from the vertical and is associated with a normal acceleration of the dummy's chest into the seatback of up to 10 g. The tangential acceleration of the dummy, which may induce riding up the seat, was generally less than the normal component so that the occupant was prevented from sliding up the deflected seatback. The bucket seat provided adequate containment and control of occupant displacements for each of the initial seatback angles of 9°, 22°, and 35°. Thus, the performance of the seat was not significantly effected by the initial seatback angle when the impact was less than 6.4 m/s (9.5 g) and the total deflection of the seatback was less than 60°.
The bucket seat did not retain the dummy on the seat for rear-end impact simulations of 9.6 m/s and 15.5 g, irrespective of the initial seatback angle of 9°, 22°, or 35°. In these tests there was a total seatback deflection of greater than 60°. The tangential acceleration of the chest was comparable to the normal component of acceleration inducing deformation of the seatback. In this case there was sufficient tangential acceleration to allow the dummy to slide up the seatback and induce extension of the neck greater than 70° as the head rides above the integrated head restraint.
In a limited series of tests, the ability of the seat to adequately retain an occupant surrogate in rear-end impacts was directly associated with the severity of deceleration. Although the seatback may dynamically deform 20°-30° during occupant loading, the tangential acceleration of the occupant is not sufficient to overcome the normal compression of the occupant into the seat at a seatback angle less than 60°. However, in those simulations where the seatback angle was greater than 60°, there was enough tangential acceleration of the occupant to permit riding up the seatback with the potential for secondary impacts of the occupant with the automotive interior.
We also observed that extension of the neck occurs as the anthropomorphic dummy's head rides above the integrated headrest of the seatback. This occurs late in the impact simulation (100-120 ms) near the end of the whole body displacement of the occupant into and deflecting the seatback. More importantly, as the anthropomorphic dummy leaves the seatback, the head may be extended as much as 70° when the surrogate moves toward rearward components of the car interior.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Collision Performance, LM Safety Car |
Technical Paper | Restraint of a Belted or Unbelted Occupant by the Seat in Rear-End Impacts |
Technical Paper | Crash Injury Prevention: A Case Study of Fatal Crashes of Lap-Shoulder Belted Occupants |
Citation
Viano, D., "Influence of Seatback Angle on Occupant Dynamics in Simulated Rear-End Impacts," SAE Technical Paper 922521, 1992, https://doi.org/10.4271/922521.Also In
References
- Severy, D.M. Brink, H.M. Baird, J.D. “Rigid Seats with 28-in. Seatback Effectively Reduce Injuries in 30+ mph Rear-End Impacts.” SAE Journal, SAE 69-532 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA April 1969
- Fell, J.C. “Data Relevant to the Performance of Head Restraints in Collisions.” Department of Transportation Washington, DC 1972
- States, J.D. Balcerak, J.C. “The Effectiveness of Head Restraints in Rear-End Impacts. Final Report.” Department of Transportation Washington, DC 1973
- States, J.D. Balcerak, J.C. Williams, J.S. et al “Injury Frequency and Head Restraint Effectiveness in Rear-End Impact Accidents.” Proceedings of the 16th Stapp Car Crash Conference , SAE Technical Paper # 720967 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1972
- Haddon, W. Jr. O'Neill, B. Kelley, A.B. Sorenson, W.W. “Automobile Head Restraints -- Frequency of Neck Injury Claims in Relation to the Presence of Head Restraints.” Amer J Pub Health 62 399 406 1972
- Martinez, J.L “Yielding Seatback is Effective in Protecting Car Occupant from Whiplash if Properly Damped.” SAE Journal Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA December 1969
- Lange, W. “Mechanical and Physiological Response of the Human Cervical Vertebral Column to Severe Impacts Applied to the Torso.” Dortmund 1970
- Furusho, H. Yokoya, K. Nishino, S. Fujiki, S. “Analysis of Occupants Movements in Rear-end Collision.” Bull JSAE 3 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1971
- Martinez, J.L. Garcia, D.J. “A Model for Whiplash.” J Biomech 1 23 82 January 1968
- States, J.D. Korn, M.W. Masengill, J.B. “The Enigma of Whiplash Injuries.” Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the American Association for Automotive Medicine Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Des Plaines, IL 1969
- Hu, A.S. Bean, S.P. Zimmerman, R.M. “Response of Belted Dummy and Cadaver to Rear Impact.” Department of Transportation Washington, DC 1976
- “The Effects of Seatback Stiffness and Collision Severity on the Dynamic Behavior of the Head During ‘Whiplash’.” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Biokinetics of Impacts IRCOBI Lyon, France 1973
- McPherson, D. Simpson, J. “Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in Vehicle Occupants.” Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the American Association for Automotive Medicine Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Des Plaines, IL 1977
- States, J.D. “Soft Tissue Injuries of the Neck.” SAE79-135 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1979
- Degravelles, W.D. Jr. Kelley, J.H. Kenkel, W.F. Burchinal, L.G. Whiplash Injuries Charles C. Thomas 1969
- Mertz, H.J. Patrick, L.M. “Investigation of the Kinematics and Kinetics of Whiplash.” SAE Transactions 76 SAE Technical Paper # 670919 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1967
- Melvin, J.W. McElhaney, J.H. “Occupant Protection in Rear-End Collisions.” SAE Technical Paper # 720033 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1972
- Data Link Inc. “Car Crash Outcomes in Rear Impacts. Appendix A to Current Issues of Occupant Protection in Car Rear Impacts.” Data Link Inc. Washington, DC 1989
- Data Link Inc. “Current Issues of Occupant Protection in Car Rear Impacts.” Prepared for the Office of Crashworthiness, Rulemaking, NHTSA Data Link Inc. Washington, DC 1990
- Hohl, M. “Soft Tissue Injuries of the Neck in Automobile Accidents.” J Bone Joint Surg 56A 1675 1686 1974
- Viano, D.C “Restraint of a Belted or Unbelted Occupant by the Seat In Rear-End Impacts.” Proceedings of the 36th Stapp Car Crash Conference , SAE Technical Paper # 922522 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1992