This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparison of Tailpipe Gaseous Emissions for RDE and WLTC Using SI Passenger Cars
Technical Paper
2017-01-2391
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The drive characteristics and gaseous emissions of legislated Real Driving Emissions (RDE) test data from 8 different spark ignition vehicles were compared to data from corresponding Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle (WLTC) tests. The effect of the official RDE exclusion of cold start and idling on the RDE test, and the effect of the use of the moving averaging window (MAW) analysis technique, were simultaneously investigated. Specific attention was paid to differences in drive characteristics of the three different driving modes and the effect this had on the distance-based CO2, CO and NOx emission factors for each. The average velocity of the RDE tests was marginally greater than the WLTC tests, while the average acceleration was smaller. The CO2 emission appeared on average 4% lower under the RDE tests compared to the WLTC tests, while the CO was 60% lower. The NOx values were 34% lower under the RDE testing, and appeared to be linked to the average acceleration. No link was seen for the maximum acceleration or deceleration, indicating that this is not a good indicator for test cycle emissions. The exclusion of cold start and idling decreased all RDE emissions. RPA (Relative Positive Acceleration) had little correlation with CO2, CO and NOx distance-based emissions, and was shown to be uncorrelated with any mass-rate emissions. The range of RPA values seen was much greater for RDE tests than WLTC tests, with individual RDE tests having variable values for each drive mode. The application of the MAW technique had minimal effect on the CO2 distance-based emission, but it appeared to decrease CO and NOx emissions by 12% and 21% on average respectively. The MAW also decreased the variation in emissions across different modes.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Thomas, D., Li, H., Wang, X., Song, B. et al., "A Comparison of Tailpipe Gaseous Emissions for RDE and WLTC Using SI Passenger Cars," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2391, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-2391.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 4 |
Also In
References
- Vlachos , T. , Bonnel , P. , Perujo , A. , Weiss , M. et al. In-Use Emissions Testing with Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) in the Current and Future European Vehicle Emissions Legislation: Overview, Underlying Principles and Expected Benefits SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 7 1 199 215 2014 10.4271/2014-01-1549
- AVL Emission Testing Systems AVL Emission Testing Handbook - 2016 80 2016
- Marotta , A. , Pavlovic , J. , Ciuffo , B. , Serra , S. , and Fontaras , G. Gaseous Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles: Moving from NEDC to the New WLTP Test Procedure Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 14 8315 8322 2015 10.1021/acs.est.5b01364
- Dings , J. Mind the Gap! Why official car fuel economy figures don’t match up to reality? 2013
- Kadijk , G. , Verbeek , M. , Smokers , R.T.M. , Spreen , J. , Patuleia , A. , Ras , M. van , Norris , J.O.W. , Johnson , A. , O’Brien , S. , Wrigley , S. , Pagnac , J. , Seban , M. , and Buttigieg , D. Supporting analysis regarding test procedure flexibilities and technology deployment for review of the light duty vehicle fleet CO2 regulations Brussels 2012
- Mock , P. , German , J. , Bandivadekar , A. , and Riemersma , I. Discrepancies between type- approval and ‘real-world’ fuel-consumption and CO 2 values: Assessment for 2001-2011 European passenger cars Berlin 2012
- Tutuianu , M. , Bonnel , P. , Ciuffo , B. , Haniu , T. , Ichikawa , N. , Marotta , A. , Pavlovic , J. , and Steven , H. Development of the World-wide harmonized Light duty Test Cycle (WLTC) and a possible pathway for its introduction in the European legislation Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 40 61 75 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.011
- Ciuffo , B. , Marotta , A. , Tutuianu , M. , Anagnostopoulos , K. , Fontaras , G. , Pavlovic , J. , Serra , S. , Tsiakmakis , S. , and Zacharof , N. Development of the Worldwide Harmonized Test Procedure for Light-Duty Vehicles: Pathway for Implementation in European Union Legislation J. Transp. Res. Board 2503 110 118 2015 10.3141/2503-12
- Kageson , P. Cycle-Beating and the EU Test Cycle for Cars Eur. Fed. Transp. Environ. 98/3 November 1998 10 1998
- Weiss , M. , Bonnel , P. , Hummel , R. , Provenza , A. , and Manfredi , U. On-road emissions of light-duty vehicles in Europe Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 19 8575 8581 2011 10.1021/es2008424
- Johnson , T. Vehicular Emissions in Review SAE Int. J. Engines 9 2 1258 1275 2016 10.4271/2016-01-0919
- Els , P. Random Cycle Test vs . Portable Emission Measurement System 2013
- Merkisz , J. , Fuc , P. , Lijewski , P. , and Bielaczyc , P. The Comparison of the Emissions from Light Duty Vehicle in On-road and NEDC Tests SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1298 2010 10.4271/2010-01-1298
- Weiss , M. , Bonnel , P. , Hummel , R. , and Manfredi , U. Analyzing on-road emissions of light-duty vehicles with Portable Emission Measurement Systems (PEMS) 9789279190728 2011 10.2788/23820
- May , J. , Bosteels , D. , and Favre , C. An Assessment of Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles using PEMS and Chassis Dynamometer Testing SAE Int. J. Engines 7 3 1326 1335 2014 10.4271/2014-01-1581
- Merkisz , J. , Pielecha , J. , Bielaczyc , P. , and Woodburn , J. Analysis of Emission Factors in RDE Tests As Well as in NEDC and WLTC Chassis Dynamometer Tests SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0980 2016 10.4271/2016-01-0980
- Department for Transport Vehicle Emissions Testing Programme 2016
- European Parliament and Council of the European Union Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/427 of 10 March 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 as regards emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6) (Text with EEA relevance) Off. J. Eur. Union 82 31 03 2016 1 98 2016
- United Nations Addendum 15: Global technical regulation No . 15 - Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedure Glob. Regist. 2014
- European Commission ANNEXES to the Commission Regulation supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and 2007