This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Highlighting the Differential Benefit in Greenhouse Gas Reduction via Adoption of Plugin Hybrid Vehicles for Different Patterns of Real Driving
Technical Paper
2017-01-1178
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
This work presents a simulation-based modeling of the equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) of plugin hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) for real driving patterns obtained from monitoring of real vehicles in public survey data sets such as the California Household Travel Survey (CHTS). Aim of the work is to highlight differences in attainable GHG reduction by adopting a PHEV instead of a conventional vehicle (CV) for different driving patterns obtained from real-world sub-populations of vehicles. Modeling of the equivalent GHG for a trip made by a PHEV can be challenging since it not only depends on the vehicle design and driving pattern of the trip in question, but also on: i) all electric range (AER) of the PHEV, ii) “well to tank” (W2T) equivalent GHG of the electricity used to charge the battery, as well as, iii) battery depletion in previous trips since the last charging event. To overcome some of these modeling challenges, previous work on an energy re-allocation model for the estimation of GHG equivalent of different charging behaviors is adopted. Full set of recorded vehicle trips in CHTS (approx. 65 thousand trips) are analyzed for two PHEV models (short and long AER), for different charging behaviors and grid conditions. Comparisons are made for GHG reduction if the same trips were done by an equivalent-sized CV, for different sub-populations of vehicles ranging from “more city-like” driving patterns to “less city-like”. Results show that certain sub-populations of vehicles could reduce their GHG by 1.7 to 3 times more than other sub-populations.
Recommended Content
Citation
Laberteaux, K. and Hamza, K., "Highlighting the Differential Benefit in Greenhouse Gas Reduction via Adoption of Plugin Hybrid Vehicles for Different Patterns of Real Driving," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1178, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1178.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 |
Also In
References
- US Department of Energy 2011 http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/05/f15/52723.pdf
- Electric Drive Transportation Association 2013 http://www.electricdrive.org/index.php?ht=d/sp/i/20952/pid/20952
- http://www.marketplace.org/2016/01/08/world/georgia-ev-sales-sputter-without-tax-break September 2016
- US Department of Energy 2016 https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/taxevb.shtml
- California Clean Vehicle Rebate Program 2015 https://cleanvehiclerebate.org/eng
- California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board 2012 http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/factsheets/clean_vehicle_incentives.pdf
- US Environmental Protection Agency 2012 http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420f12051.pdf
- California Air Resources Board, Zero Emission Vehicle Program 2015 http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/zevprog.htm
- Environmental Protection Agency, US Dept. of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 2013 Model Year 2014 Fuel Economy Guide: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/pdfs/guides/FEG2014.pdf
- Heinig , K. , Stephenson , D. , and Beyer , T. Thermal Response of Aluminum Engine Block During Thermal Spraying of Bores: Comparison of FEA and Thermocouple Results SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0451 2017
- Hamza K , Laberteaux K 2016 A Cluster Analysis Study of Opportune Adoption of Electric Drive Vehicles for Better Greenhouse Gas Reduction ASME IDETC-2016 Charlotte, NC
- Granovskii ,, M Dincer , I Rosen , M 2006 Economic and environmental comparison of conventional, hybrid, electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles Journal of Power Sources 159 1186 1193
- Samaras , C Meisterling K 2008 Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles: Implications for Policy Environmental Science and Technology 42 9 3170 3176
- Bradley T , Frank A 2009 Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 115 128
- Shiau ,, C Samaras , C Hauffe , R Michalek J 2009 Impact of battery weight and charging patterns on the economic and environmental benefits of plug-in hybrid vehicles Energy Policy 37 2653 2663
- Axsen J , Kurani K , McCarthy R , Yang C 2011 Plug-in hybrid vehicle GHG impacts in California: Integrating consumer-informed recharge profiles with an electricity-dispatch model Energy Policy 39 1617 1629
- Kelly , J McDonald , J Keoleian G 2012 Time-dependent plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging based on national driving patterns and demographics Applied Energy 94 395 405
- Traut , E Hendrickson , C Klampfl , E Liu , Y Michalek J 2012 Optimal design and allocation of electrified vehicles and dedicated charging infrastructure for minimum lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost Energy Policy 51 524 534
- Raykin , L Roorda , M MacLean H 2012 Impacts of driving patterns on tank-to-wheel energy use of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles Transportation Research Part D 17 243 250
- Neubauer , J Brooker , A Wood E 2013 Sensitivity of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle economics to drive patterns, electric range, energy management, and charge strategies Journal of Power Sources 236 357 364
- Karabasoglu , O Michalek J 2013 Influence of driving patterns on life cycle cost and emissions of hybrid and plug-in electric vehicle power trains Energy Policy 60 445 461
- US Environmental Protection Agency 2015 Dynamometer Drive Cycles
- Neubauer , J Wood E 2013 Accounting for Driver Aggression in the Simulation of Conventional and Advanced Vehicles SAE World Congress 2013 http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/57503.pdf
- California Household Travel Survey Data Dictionary September 2013
- US Department of Energy 2015 http://energy.gov/eere/vehicles/vehicle-technologies-office-modeling-and-simulation
- Kim , N Rousseau , A Rask E 2012 SAE Paper # 2012-01-1040
- Brooker , A. , Gonder , J. , Wang , L. , Wood , E. FASTSim: A Model to Estimate Vehicle Efficiency, Cost and Performance SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0973 2015 10.4271/2015-01-0973
- Newman , K. , Kargul , J. , and Barba , D. Benchmarking and Modeling of a Conventional Mid-Size Car Using ALPHA SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1140 2015 10.4271/2015-01-1140
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2014 Future Automotive Systems Technology Simulator: FASTSim http://www.nrel.gov/transportation/fastsim.html
- Hamza , K Laberteaux K 2016 An Energy Reallocation Model for Estimation of Equivalent Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Various Charging Behaviors of Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicles SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains 5 139 147
- Argonne National Lab 2015 GREET 2015 software https://greet.es.anl.gov/
- US Energy Information Administration 2016 http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=427&t=3
- California Energy Commission 2016 http://www.energy.ca.gov/almanac/electricity_data/electric_generation_capacity.html
- Idaho National Lab 2015 https://avt.inl.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/arra/ProjectHighlights.pdf