This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Influence on Working Performance of the Canister Cavity Design
Technical Paper
2017-01-1081
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
In order to study the single cavity and double cavity canister work performance, the L/D, as well as the similarities and differences among the diameter of the adsorption mouth, purge mouth and air mouth have been studied. At the same time, the work performance of ORVR canister and common canister is also studied. The results demonstrate that the similar of L/D, efficient work ability and efficient adsorption rate of the double cavity canister is better than the single cavity canister. The bigger of L/D, the stronger work ability of the canister. However, the excessive increase of the L/D is not conducive to the canister desorption, instead resulting in the increase of RARCP. The adsorption mouth diameter of common canister is generally smaller or similar to the purge mouth, while for ORVR canister the adsorption mouth diameter is bigger than the purge mouth and similar to air mouth. The vehicle purge flow test results demonstrate that the maximum purge flow of double cavity canister is bigger than that of single cavity, while the total amount of purge flow is similar with each other. The change of the quality about double cavity canister is smaller than that of single cavity. The results provide theoretical basis for canister design.
Recommended Content
Authors
- Chongzhi Zhong - China Automotive Technology and Research Center
- Tieqiang Fu - China Automotive Technology and Research Center
- Chunbei Dai - China Automotive Technology and Research Center
- Taiyu Zhang - China Automotive Technology and Research Center
- Ke Wu - China Automotive Technology and Research Center
- Wangwen Gu - China Automotive Technology and Research Center
Citation
Zhong, C., Fu, T., Dai, C., Zhang, T. et al., "The Influence on Working Performance of the Canister Cavity Design," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1081, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1081.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 |
Also In
References
- Limits and measurement methods for emissions from light-duty vehicles 2016
- Bishop , R. and Berg , P. Vapor Canister Heater for Evaporative Emissions Systems SAE Technical Paper 870123 1987 10.4271/870123
- Fan Biao , Qi JIE Humble Discussion on Automobile Canister Design Agricultural Equipment and Vehicle Engineering 2015 53 8 71 73
- Guangwei , Xu The effect of fuel evaporation control system of vehicle and failure analysis 2014 17 252 252
- Junhua Gao , Tieqiang Fu , A Study on Factors Affecting the Performance of Carbon Canister Automotive Engineering 2006 28 2 134 137
- Yuanqing Huang , Fei Wang , The simulation about ventilation resistance of carbon canister 2013
- Yuelin Li , Xing He , Study on Vehicle Carbon Canister Based on Three-dimensional Numerical Simulation Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering. 2012 2 6 424 430
- Kim , J. and Richardson , A. Study of Vapor Generation from Fuel System Components SAE Technical Paper 952788 1995 10.4271/952788
- Itakura , H. , Kato , N. , Kohama , T. , Hyoudou , Y. Studies on Carbon Canester to Satisfy LEVII EVAP Regulations SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0895 2000 10.4271/2000-01-0895
- Williams , R. and Clontz , C. Impact and Control of Canister Bleed Emissions SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0733 2001 10.4271/2001-01-0733