This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Estimating the Cost Impact of Lightweighting Automotive Closures
Technical Paper
2015-01-0581
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The approaching corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) regulations will again increase with new model years (MY). The U.S. Government finalized a regulation requiring cars and light trucks average 54.5 mpg fuel economy for MY2025. Vehicle manufacturers recognize removing weight is a key feature to meeting their targets for fuel economy and emission reductions. One common OEM strategy is the implementation of incremental weight reductions to attain these goals. The automotive industry continues to look for opportunities to reduce weight and cost while continually increasing performance and safety. Lightweighting technologies enhance vehicle performance, (fuel economy, acceleration, braking and emissions). New materials are available to reduce weight; however the incremental cost for the weight reduction can be prohibitive. This study will encompass the utilization of lightweight materials, as well as current and evolving manufacturing processes. Where reducing weight while achieving performance targets for dent resistance, stiffness, and crash-worthiness are the goals; the key is to attain a lightweight assembly that assists in meeting the fuel economy targets, through optimized part design and/or material substitution.
Determining the cost to meet incremental light weighting objectives should be standardized using the cost per pound saved unit of measure. Previous studies have been conducted estimating that weight reductions using higher strength steels can cost 50 cents per each pound reduced, with claims that savings from substituting aluminum can cost $1.50-2.00 per pound saved. Automotive manufacturers estimate the cost of reductions could reach as high at $7 per pound reduced, while federal regulators estimate a significantly lower cost.
Our objective is to address this discrepancy between these cost estimates for lightweighting. Current methods of measuring the cost of lightweight are often done through a piece cost evaluation in $/lb, or $/Kg. Another method includes evaluating costs from a tear down know as bottom up estimation. We will also evaluate how changes in lightweighting strategies affect direct manufacturing cost (DMC). We will examine the direct manufacturing costs to determine the cost feasibility to manufacture lightweight vehicle closures (doors, hood, and decklids). We wish to determine the manufacturers' cost impact caused by rapid change in adaptation of incremental lightweighting materials and processes applied to vehicles as opposed to mature manufacturing practices.
The research will focus on methods used to create automotive closures. We will evaluate closure case studies, showing the cost factors of using different materials and processes evaluating the savings in weight compared to a baseline closure. We will explain our method of cost estimation to achieve light weighting in a way to better evaluate cost to meet these regulations on fuel consumption and emissions across the auto industry; to better inform the industry and regulators of the true cost of reducing the mass of automobiles.
Recommended Content
Citation
Deptula, L. and Noah, A., "Estimating the Cost Impact of Lightweighting Automotive Closures," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0581, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0581.Also In
References
- Alternative Fuels Data Center: Maps and Data EERE: Alternative Fuels Data Center Home http://www.afdc.energy.gov/data/10562
- DuPont-Sponsored Survey: Lightweighting Leads Automotive Fuel Efficiency Technologies PRWeb August 26 2014 http://www.prweb.com/releases/dupontautomotive/lightweighting%20wardsauto/prweb12074138.htm
- Impact of vehicle weight reduction on fuel economy on various architectures Research Report Conducted by Ricardo Inc. for the Aluminum Association 2008-04
- Bastani , P. Heywood , J. Hope C. U.S. CAFESTANDARDS Potential for Meeting Light-duty Vehicle Fuel Economy Targets, 2016-2025. An MIT Energy Initiative Report Jan. 2012
- Black , J. Updated Costs (June 2011 Basis) for Selected Bituminous Baseline Cases National Energy Technology Laboratory 2012
- Brooke , L. Special Report Meeting CAFE 2025 AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL 2012 http://www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/meeting_cafe_2025.pdf
- Center for Automotive Research Greener Products, Changing Skills LIGHTWEIGHT MATERIALS &FORMING REPORT Www.cargroup.org May 2011
- Center for Precision Forming (CPF), and The Ohio State University Forming of Aluminum Alloy Sheets for Automotive Applications 2012 www.FormingOfAluminumAlloySheetsforAutomotiveApplications.org
- DuPont-Sponsored Survey: Lightweighting Leads Automotive Fuel Efficiency Technologies PRWeb August 26 2014 http://www.prweb.com/releases/dupont-automotive/lightweightingwardsauto/prweb12074138.htm
- Elaheh , G. Materials in Automotive Application, State of the Art and Prospects Www.intechopen.com University of Sheffield UK www.intechopen.com Jan 8 2011
- Francfort , J. , and Walkowicz K. Vehicle Technologies Office: Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy | Department of Energy http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/avta/
- Gehm , R. Heavy on the Lightweighting, SAE International October 19 2012 http://articles.sae.org/11502/
- German , john lightweighting as a measure to reduce ghg emissions greenhouse gas reduction potential and cost of light-duty vehicle technologies. Icct workshop Http://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/icct_apr27_icct_lightweighting.pdf
- Grujicic , m. , Arakere g. , Pandurangan b. , Hariharan a. , Yen c.-f. , and Cheeseman b. A. Development of a robust and cost-effective friction stir welding process for use in advanced military vehicles journal of materials engineering and performance 2011 10.1007/s11665-010-9650-0
- Hamacher , M. Forschungsgesellschaft Kraftfahrwesen mbH Aachen Optimization of Tailored Blank Concepts for Vehicle Doors 2nd European HyperWorks Technology Conference 2008
- Hamill , Jack A. P/N JOINING PROCESSES, MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUES Hoeganaes Corporation Riverton, NJ 08077 http://www.drivealuminum.org/research-resources/PDF/Research/2008/2008-Ricardo-Study.pdf
- Black J, Updated Costs (June 2011 Basis) for Selected Bituminous Baseline Cases National Energy Technology Laboratory 2012
- Joshi , A. Advanced lightweight materials summit, Fuel Economy Learning Program Manager General Motors aug 27 2012
- Joshua , C. Schroeder , G. Automotive Lightweighting Leads to Industry Investment Area Development Magazine, Advanced Industries 2014 September 5 2014 http://www.areadevelopment.com/Automotive/Advanced-Industries-2014/new-manufacturingt-investment-lightweight-vehicles-2727261.shtml
- LOTUE ENGINEERING Evaluating the Structure and Crashworthiness of a 2020 Model-Year, Mass-Reduced Crossover Vehicle Using FEA Modeling Lotus Engineering Inc. California Air Resources Board 31 Aug. 2012
- Lutsey , N. California Air Resource Board Technologies and Trends for Reducing Automobile Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the 2025 Timeframe 2010
- National Research Council (U.S.) Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles Washington, DC National Academies Press 2011
- Paul , s. , Lim t. , Mirdamadi m. , and Mittal a. dow automotive. “the synergy tm door - a new approach to lightweight steel doors.” 2014 Www.autosteel.org
- Penton Research Lightweighting Leads Fuel Efficiency Technologies Dupont August 2014 http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2014/08/05/12074138/Lightweighting-leads-fuel-efficiency_2014_Bar-Graph.jpg
- Schultz , R. , Abraham A. , and Worldwide D. Metallic Material Trends for North American Light Vehicles North American Light Vehicle Metallic Material Trends 2009
- Singh , harry 2012 august Mass reduction for light-duty vehicles for model Years 2017-2025.(report no. Dot hs 811 666)
- Ashley , S. All-aluminum Frame of GM's 2014 Corvette Saves 99 Lb SAE Automotive Magazine 30 June 13 25 Aug. 2014 http://articles.sae.org/11744/
- Sujit , D. Life Cycle Assessment - Energy and CO2 Emissions of Aluminum-Intensive Vehicles OAK RIDGE National Laboratory. Department of Energy 15 Jan. 2014
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Light Duty Truck Mass Reduction Study Results Office of Transportation and Air Quality Office of Air and Radiation 2014
- Verbrugge , M. the cost and benefits of materials choices for automotive applications 2013
- World Auto Steel Strong. Safe. Sustainable http://www.worldautosteel.org