This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Study on Area Metric Based upon Multiple Correlated System Response Quantities
Technical Paper
2015-01-0454
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Area metric provides a quantitative measure which characterizes the disagreement of numerical predictions and experimental observations. It is defined as the area between the prediction distribution and the data distribution as a kind of global measure of the mismatch between them. U-pooling method, which obtains area metric based upon multiple System Response Quantities (SRQs), is adopted to increase the credibility of metrics. However, the multiple SRQs are required to be independent in u-pooling method, which usually cannot be satisfied in practice. If the area metric is obtained in directly u-pooling method without considering the correlation of the SRQs in engineering applications, the metric would not factually express the disagreement of numerical simulation and experimental observation and it may be unreliable. In this paper, principle component analysis is introduced to remove the correlation of SRQs firstly, and then u-pooling method is applied to get the area metric. As a result, it not only makes SRQs uncorrelated, and also greatly decreases computational cost. Furthermore, numerical examples and an example with engineering background are performed to illustrate the validity and reasonability of the method proposed in this paper.
Citation
Shen, Z., Chen, X., He, Q., and Zang, C., "Study on Area Metric Based upon Multiple Correlated System Response Quantities," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0454, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0454.Also In
References
- Chen , X. , Xiao S. , Liu X. The model validation and evaluation 1. on the Sandia's structural dynamics challenge problem, Mechanics in Engineering 33 3 50 55 2011
- Oberkampf , W. L , Barone , M. F Measures of agreement 2. between computation and experiment: Validation metrics, Journal of Computational Physics 217 1 5 36 2006
- Sornette , D. , Davis , A. B , Ide , K. , Vixie , K. R Algorithm for 3. Model Validation: Theory and Applications, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 16 6562 6567 2007
- Liu , Y. , Chen , W. , Arendt , P. Toward a Better Understanding 4. of Model Validation Metrics, Journal of Mechanical Design 133 7 071005 1 071005 13 2011
- Chen , W. , Baghdasaryan , L. , Buranathiti , T. Model validation 5. via uncertainty propagation, AIAA J. 42 1406 1415 2004
- Chen , W. , Xiong , Y. , Tsui , K. L A design-driven validation 6. approach using Bayesian prediction models, J. Mech. Des. 130 2 2008
- Oberkampf , W. L , Roy , C. J Verification and validation in 7. scientific computing, Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2010
- Ferson , S. , Oberkampf , W. L , Ginzburg , L. Model Validation 8. and Predictive Capability for the Thermal Challenge Problem, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 197 29-32 2408 2430 2008
- Hills , R. G , Trucano , T. G Statistical Validation of 9. Engineering and Scientific Models: Background. Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND99-1256 1999
- Jiang , X. , Yang , R. , Barbat , S. , and Weerappuli , P. Bayesian Probabilistic PCA Approach for Model Validation of Dynamic Systems, SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 2 1 555 563 2009 10.4271/2009-01-1404
- Dowding , K. J , Pilch , M. Hills R G, Formulation of the 11. Thermal Problem, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 29-32 2385 2389 2008
- Red-Horse , J. R , Paez , T. L Sandia National Laboratories 12. Validation Workshop: Structural Dynamics Application, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 29-32 2578 2584 2008
- Li , W. , Chen , W. , Jiang , Z. New validation metrics for models 13. with multiple correlated responses. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 127 1 11 2014
- Ferson , S. , Oberkampf , W. L Validation of imprecise Probability Models, International Journal of Reliability and Safety 3 1-3 3 22 2009
- Xiong , Y. Using predictive models in engineering design: metamodeling, uncertainty quantification, and model validation, Evanston, Illinois Northwestern University 2008
- Ma , Y. , Liu , Q. B , Liu , Y. Y Image sparsity evaluation based on principle component analysis, ACTA PHYSICA SINICA 62 20 204202-1 204202-11 2013