This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Intercomparison Tests Among Different Methods in Dimensional Reports for Complex Parts - Benefits and Particularity of Each Method
Technical Paper
2014-36-0228
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
With the Market trend in small components and more reliable directed some companies to develop different methods and equipment aiming a high accuracy and fast dimensional measurements.
The objective of this work is to present the difference of accuracy related to the measurement type and time in comparison with actual methods existing in the market with the new technologies. The most conventional dimensional methods via optical 3D machines will be compared with the results obtained from a computer tomography machine.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Ultrasonic Characterization of Plastic Material |
Technical Paper | Accelerated Testing of Mechanical Equipment |
Journal Article | Capability Assessment Process for the Optimisation of Testing Facilities for Powertrain Development |
Citation
Martins, J. and Lieu, L., "Intercomparison Tests Among Different Methods in Dimensional Reports for Complex Parts - Benefits and Particularity of Each Method," SAE Technical Paper 2014-36-0228, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-36-0228.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 |
Also In
References
- Martins , J. Measurement Report Validation Laboratory DIM 0336-04-13 April 2013
- Mitutoyo Calibration Certificate Mitutoyo South American CAE 0601/11 Dec 2011
- NSI CT Measurement verification North Star Imaging system model x50 Jul. 2011