This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Equivalency or Compromise? A Comparative Study of the Use of Nylon 6,6 and Polyester Fiber in Automotive Airbag Cushions
Technical Paper
2014-01-0509
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Changes in the automotive supply chain over the past several years were brought about by global economic pressures, and forced some materials into tight supply as the industry started its recovery. One such material is polyamide 6,6 fiber (PA 6,6) used for airbags, which was in tight supply in 2008-09. This, with the availability of new low temperature inflators caused some airbag module manufacturers to revisit the use of polyester (PET), which had been used sporadically and in small quantities since the 1970s, although the overwhelming majority of airbags used PA 6,6.
Over the last several years PET has been adopted for use in a small number of airbag programs to reduce supply concerns, but this use has come with performance tradeoffs of higher weight, lower tear and seam properties, and other changes. Still, the lower polymer cost of PET has driven a wider evaluation.
Polyamide 6,6 and polyester are not equivalent fibers, and differences in thermal capacity, toughness, modulus, and other properties result in different fabric performance. The purpose of this paper is to raise awareness of key property differences so that the appropriate polymer is selected for each airbag.
This report is a summary of studies conducted by INVISTA S.á.r.l. to understand the potential consequences and important considerations of changing airbag cushion material from polyamide 6,6 to polyester. INVISTA is a current supplier of PA 6,6 and PET for a wide range of products including airbags, and can thus provide an unbiased view on the materials. These studies include the analysis of airbag modules that changed from PA 6,6 to PET, and laboratory tests of fibers and fabrics measuring the performance differences between these polymers.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Orme, B., Walsh, R., and Westoby, S., "Equivalency or Compromise? A Comparative Study of the Use of Nylon 6,6 and Polyester Fiber in Automotive Airbag Cushions," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0509, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0509.Also In
References
- European Airbag Standardization Committee (EASC) Instruction Number 99040180-A08, Cushion - Material
- Standard Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Martindale Abrasion Tester Method), ASTM D4966 - 12e1
- Dr. Savin D. A. 2008 Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) - Techniques PSC34L/720
- Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) Number 226 “Ejection mitigation”
- Barnes J.A. , Rawson N. Experimental Determination of the Heat Resistive Properties of Airbag Fabrics Proc. 8 th World Textile Congress, Industrial, Technical and High Performance Textiles University of Huddersfield July 15 16 1998 329 338
- Patent WO2008094317 A1 2008 Mach A Debenedictis, Thomas Edward Schmitt, “Woven Polyester Fabric for Airbags”