This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Thermodynamic Benefits of Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engines
Technical Paper
2011-01-2216
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
A detailed thermodynamic analysis was performed to demonstrate the fundamental efficiency advantage of an opposed-piston two-stroke engine over a standard four-stroke engine. Three engine configurations were considered: a baseline six-cylinder four-stroke engine, a hypothetical three-cylinder opposed-piston four-stroke engine, and a three-cylinder opposed-piston two-stroke engine. The bore and stroke per piston were held constant for all engine configurations to minimize any potential differences in friction. The closed-cycle performance of the engine configurations were compared using a custom analysis tool that allowed the sources of thermal efficiency differences to be identified and quantified. The simulation results showed that combining the opposed-piston architecture with the two-stroke cycle increased the indicated thermal efficiency through a combination of three effects: reduced heat transfer because the opposed-piston architecture creates a more favorable combustion chamber area/volume ratio, increased ratio of specific heats because of leaner operating conditions made possible by the two-stroke cycle, and decreased combustion duration achievable at the fixed maximum pressure rise rate because of the lower energy release density of the two-stroke engine. When averaged over a representative engine cycle, the opposed-piston two-stroke engine had 10.4% lower indicated-specific fuel consumption than the four-stroke engine.
In a second analysis, the closed-cycle simulation was extended to a engine system model to estimate the pumping work required to achieve the operating conditions needed to reach a specified NOx emissions rate. Because the opposed-piston two-stroke engine has inherently lower peak in-cylinder temperatures than the four-stroke engine, lower intake pressure was required to meet the NOx emissions constraint and as a result lower pumping work was needed. At the simulated condition considered, the opposed-piston two-stroke engine had approximately 9.0% lower brake-specific fuel consumption than the four-stroke engine.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Herold, R., Wahl, M., Regner, G., Lemke, J. et al., "Thermodynamic Benefits of Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2216, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-2216.Also In
References
- Pirault, J.-P. Flint, M. “Opposed Piston Engines: Evolution, Use, and Future Applications” SAE International Warrendale, PA 978-0-7680-1800-4 2009 10.4271/R-378
- Barsanti, E. Matteucci, F. “Motore a Pistoni Contrapposti” Piedmont Patent 700 July 26 1858
- Barsanti, E. Matteucci, F. “Improved Apparatus for Obtaining Motive Power from Explosive Compounds” Great Britain Patent 3270 December 31 1861
- Junkers, H. “Cylinder of Internal-Combustion Engines and Other Similar Machines” U.S. Patent 1 231 903 July 3 1917
- Junkers, H. “Engine” U.S. Patent 2 031 318 February 18 1936
- Heywood, J.B. “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals” McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York 0-07-028637-X 1988
- TIAX, LLC “Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles” Report to the National Academy of Sciences 2009
- Committee to Assess Fuel Economy Technologies for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles, National Research Council, Transportation Research Board “Technologies and Approaches to Reducing the Fuel Consumption of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles” The National Academies Press Washington, D.C. 0-309-14983-5 2010
- DeRaad, S. Fulton, B. Gryglak, A. Hallgren, B. et al. “The New Ford 6.7L V-8 Turbocharged Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1101 2010 10.4271/2010-01-1101
- Cummins, Inc. “Cummins Every Time - On-Highway - Medium-Duty Truck - EPA 2010 ISB6.7” http://cumminsengines.com/every/applications/medium_duty_trucks/EPA_2010_ISB67_MDT.page March 2010
- Navistar, Inc. “MaxxForce 7 | Commercial Engine | Diesel Engine” http://maxxforce.com/Application/on-highway/Engine/MaxxForce_7 March 2010
- Schweitzer, P.H. “Scavenging of Two-Stroke Cycle Diesel Engines” The Macmillan Co. New York 1949
- DieselNet “Heavy-Duty Supplemental Emissions Test (SET)” http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/cycles/set.php March 2010
- Taylor, C.F. “The Internal-Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice - Volume 1: Thermodynamics, Fluid Flow, Performance” 232 The M.I.T. Press Cambridge, MA 978-0262700269 1985
- Regner, G. Herold, R. E. Wahl, M. H. Dion, E. Redon, F. Johnson, D. Callahan, B. J. McIntyre, S. “The Achates Power Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engine: Performance and Emissions Results in a Medium-Duty Application” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2221 2011 10.4271/2011-01-2221
- McBride, B.J. Zehe, M.J. Gordon, S. “NASA Glenn Coefficients for Calculating Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Species” NASA/TP - 2002-211556 2002