This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Prevention of Defects and Customer Dissatisfaction using Quick Design Review
Technical Paper
2011-01-0510
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
We have constructed a design review system in which Full Process and Quick Design Review processes are selectively used according to the degree of newness in a design change. The Full Process Design Review is conducted for a review of system or part designs having a high level of newness and the tools and process used in this review were standardized. The Quick Design Review is newly developed design review process that could be conducted in a quicker and simpler manner for designs involving a medium level of newness in order to effectively prevent design-related problems. The Quick Design Review uses a changes list and Design Review Based on Failure Mode (DRBFM) [1] worksheets to focus on the changed points. This method enables the engineers involved to identify problems and to devise solutions efficiently and effectively through discussions. In order to promote the global deployment of Quick DR, a qualification system has been introduced and training programs have been conducted globally. This paper describes the development of Quick Design Review process including an actual application example.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Oshima, M., Nara, K., and Yoshimura, T., "Prevention of Defects and Customer Dissatisfaction using Quick Design Review," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0510, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0510.Also In
Reliability and Robust Design in Automotive Engineering, 2011
Number: SP-2306; Published: 2011-04-12
Number: SP-2306; Published: 2011-04-12
References
- Yoshimura, T. Toyota Style Proactive Problem Prevention-GD 3 Tokyo Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers (JUSE) Press 165 2002
- Oshima, M. Continuous Quality Improvement Activities Toward the Attainment of Quality Leadership Nissan Technical Review 65 3 7 2009
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Standard “Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Design (Design FMEA), Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process FMEA),” SAE Standard J1739 Jan. 2009
- Chrysler, Daimler Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Reference Manual Automotive Industry Action Group 1993 1995 2001 1
- Akao, Yoji Quality Function Deployment - Integrating Customer Requirements Into Product Design 82