This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Auditory Localization of Backup Alarms: The Effects of Alarm Mounting Location
Technical Paper
2011-01-0086
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Sound localization of a backup alarm is important in situations when vehicles are reversing. Previous work has demonstrated the effects of ambient noise level and the spectral content of the backup alarm on localization. In the current study, we investigate the effects of backup alarm mounting location on localization performance. To address this question, we asked blindfolded listeners to localize backup alarms installed in positions that provided either direct (e.g., installed on the outer rear aspect of the vehicle) or indirect (e.g., installed within the inner frame rails of the vehicle) sound propagation paths to the listener. Additionally, we explored the effects of ambient noise level and the direction of origin of the alarm (behind, in front of, or to the left or right of the listener), and the interactions among all three factors (alarm location, ambient noise, and alarm direction relative to the listener). Localization performance was examined in terms of percent correct localization, as well as percent front-back confusion errors. When the alarm stimuli were presented in front, the alarm that was mounted directly in front of the listener -- providing a direct path to the listener --produced more correct localizations than the other alarms. This direct-path alarm also resulted in the least front-back confusions overall. However, when the alarm stimuli were presented behind the listener, the alarm mounted at the top of the rear of the truck --providing a direct but elevated path to the listener -- produced the worst performance and the most front-back confusion errors. An important factor affecting listeners' localization performance was the orientation of the listener relative to the direction from which the alarm stimuli originated. When the alarm was to the right or left of the listener, all alarm mounting locations produced equally good performance and no front-back confusions. Alarms originating from behind the listener, however, generally produced the worst performance, and the most front-back confusions, for the majority of the alarm mounting locations.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Modeling and Control of Large Flexible Frame Vehicles Using Bond Graphs |
Technical Paper | On the Analysis of RIGIDITY and STRENGTH of Crane Carrier Frame |
Technical Paper | A General Formulation for Topology Optimization |
Authors
Citation
Heckman, G., Kim, R., Khan, F., Bare, C. et al., "Auditory Localization of Backup Alarms: The Effects of Alarm Mounting Location," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0086, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0086.Also In
References
- Lancaster, J. A. Casali, J. G. Alali, K. “Backup Alarms: Sounds from the Ground,” Modern Contractor Solutions 56 57 Jan. 2008
- Macpherson, E. A. Middlebrooks, J. C. “Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: The duplex theory of sound localization revisited,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 5 2219 2236 2002
- Middlebrooks, J. C. Green, D. M. “Sound localization by human listeners,” Annu. Rev. Psychol. 42 135 59 1991
- Blauert, J. “Sound localization in the median plane,” Acustica 22 205 213 1969 70
- Hebrank, J. Wright, D. “Spectral cues used in the localization of sound sources on the median plane,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56 6 1829 1834 1974
- Mehrgardt, S. Mellert, V. “Transformation characteristics of the external human ear,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61 6 1567 1576 1977
- Oldfield, S. R. Parker, S. P. A. “Acuity of sound localization: a topography of auditory space. I. Normal hearing conditions,” Perception 13 581 600 1984
- Middlebrooks, J. C. “Narrow-band sound localization related to external ear acoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92 5 2607 2624 1992
- Paulus, E. “Sound localization cues of binaural hearing,” Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 82 4 240 248 2003
- Casali, J. G. Alali, K. “Vehicle backup alarm localization (or not): Effects of passive and electronic hearing protectors, ambient noise level, and backup alarm spectral content,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society - 53 rd Annual Meeting 1617 1621 2009
- Withington, D. J. “Reversing goes broadband,” Quarry Management 31 5 27 34 2004
- Shaw, E. A. G. “The external ear,” Handbook of Sensory Physiology , Volume V/1 Auditory System Keidel, W. D. Neff, W. D. 455 490 1974
- Dizon, R. M. Litovsky, R. Y. “Localization dominance in the median-sagittal plane: effect of stimulus duration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 6 3142 3155 2004
- Dizon, R. Litovsky, R. Y. Colburn, H. S. “Positional dependence on localization dominance in the median-sagittal plane,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101 S3106
- Casali, J. G. Robinson, G. S. Dabney, E. C. Gauger, D. “Effect of Electronic ANR and Conventional Hearing Protectors on Vehicle Backup Alarm Detection in Noise,” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46 1 1 10 2004