This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Accuracy of Photogrammetry vs. Hands-on Measurement Techniques used in Accident Reconstruction
Technical Paper
2010-01-0065
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
A study was conducted to assess the relative accuracy of two
measurement techniques commonly used for vehicle measurements in
damaged-based accident reconstruction. The traditional technique of
hands-on measurement was compared with the use of photogrammetry
for measurement of targeted damaged vehicles. Three undamaged
vehicles were subjected to 4 impacts, resulting in 4 damaged areas
(two front, one side and one rear). The study's intent was only
to examine the accuracy of each measurement technique. The
influence of other confounding independent variables such as
selection of measurement location on the vehicle, reference line
location, and definitions of what constitutes "damage,"
etc., were controlled for and minimized by using predefined
measurement points on the vehicles and prescribed station
lines.
The points on each vehicle were measured using both techniques,
and compared to baseline reference measurements obtained via a
TOPCON GPT-7005i prismless imaging total station. PhotoModeler was
employed as the photogrammetry technique, and photographs of the
post-impact vehicles were obtained using several different cameras
and photographers, including an adjuster with no formal training or
instruction in photographing for photogrammetric analysis. Hands-on
measurements were obtained via two groups of qualified
professionals in the field of accident reconstruction, with access
to both the vehicles and traditional measuring equipment such as
tape measures, crush jig and plumb bobs.
The results found that both methods effectively measured the
vehicle points, with a mean difference between the baseline and
hands-on measurements of 0.6 ± 1.4 cm, and a mean difference
between the baseline and photogrammetry measurements of 0.1 ± 1.0
cm. The accuracy of the photogrammetry method was found to be
slightly greater than that for hands-on physical measurements. The
results indicated that both physical inspection of a damaged
vehicle and photogrammetric analysis from photographs are suitably
accurate techniques for vehicle damage measurement, and in some
cases the photogrammetric analysis may even yield superior
results.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Front and Rear Car Crush Coefficients for Energy Calculations |
Technical Paper | On the Question of
|
Technical Paper | Bloodborne Pathogen Hazards in Accident Investigation Practice |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Randles, B., Jones, B., Welcher, J., Szabo, T. et al., "The Accuracy of Photogrammetry vs. Hands-on Measurement Techniques used in Accident Reconstruction," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0065, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-0065.Also In
References
- Emori, R.I. “Analytical Approach to Automobile Collisions,” SAE Technical Paper 680016 1968
- Campbell, K.L. “Energy Basis for Collision Severity,” SAE Technical Paper 740565 1974
- Fricke, L. Traffic Accident Reconstruction Northwestern University Traffic Institute Evanston, IL 2nd 1990
- CRASH3 User's Guide and Technical Manual,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation Washington, DC February 1981
- “Collision Deformation Classification,” SAE Standard J224 Mar. 1980
- “Truck Deformation Classification,” SAE Standard J1301 June 2009
- Brown, D.R. Wiechel, J.F. Stansifer, R.L. Guenther, D.A. “Practical Application of Vehicle Speed Determination from Crush Measurement,” SAE Technical Paper 870498 1987
- Tumbas, N.S. Smith, R.A. “Measuring Protocol for Quantifying Vehicle Damage from an Energy Basis Point of View,” SAE Technical Paper 880072 1988
- Boddorff, T.C. Jones, I.S. “Simple Overhead Photography Techniques for Vehicle Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 900370 1990
- Woolley, R.L. White, K.A. Asay, A.F. Bready, J.E. “Determination of Vehicle Crush from Two Photographs and the Use of 3D Displacement Vectors in Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 910118 1991
- Comeau, J.-L. Dalmotas, D.J. German, A. Monk, B. et al. “Crush Measurement for Side Impacts Using a Total Station,” SAE Technical Paper 960100 1996
- Massa, D.J. Barrette, R.W. “Using Three-Dimensional Digitization to Model a Vehicle,” SAE Technical Paper 980377 1998
- Bryner, C.G. “A Photogrammetric System for Motor Vehicle Accident Investigation,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Accident Investigation Division Washington, D.C. 1974
- Pepe, M.D. Sobek, J.S. Huett, G.J. “Three Dimensional Computerized Photogrammetry and its Application to Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 890739 1989
- Pepe, M.D. Sobek, J.S. Zimmerman, D.A. “Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry as Established by Controlled Field Tests,” SAE Technical Paper 930662 1993
- Tumbas, N.S. Kinney, J.R. Smith, G.C. “Photogrammetry and Accident Reconstruction: Experimental Results,” SAE Technical Paper 940925 1994
- Fenton, S. Kerr, R. “Accident Scene Diagramming Using New Photogrammetric Technique,” SAE Technical Paper 970944 1997
- Cooner, S.A. Balke K.N. “Use of Photogrammetry for Investigation of Traffic Incident Scenes,” Texas Transportation Institute Report No. TX-99/4907-2 October 2000
- Breen, K.C. Anderson, C.E. “The Application of Photogrammetry to Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 861422 1986
- Lie, A. Tingvall, C. Johansson S. Johansson, S-O. “Photogrammetric Measurements of Damaged Vehicles in Road Traffic Accidents,” The Twelfth International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1989
- Kullgren, A. Lie, A. Tingvall, C. “Photogrammetry Used for Measurement in Field Accident Studies- Development of a New Simple System,” The Fourteenth International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1994
- Fenton, S. Johnson, W. LaRocque, J. Rose, N. et al. “Using Digital Photogrammetry to Determine Vehicle Crush and Equivalent Barrier Speed (EBS),” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0439 1999
- O'Shields, L.L. Kress, T.A. Hungerford, J.C. Aikens, C.H. “Determination and Verification of Equivalent Barrier Speeds (EBS) Using PhotoModeler as a Measurement Tool,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1208 2004
- Rucoba, R. Duran, A. Carr, L. Erdeljac, D. “A Three-Dimensional Crush Measurement Methodology using Two-Dimensional Photographs,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0163 2008
- “Instrumentation for Impact Test - Part 1 - Electronic Instrumentation,” SAE Standard J211-1 March 1995
- “Sign Convention for Vehicle Crash Testing,” SAE Standard J1733 Dec. 1994
- Switzer, D. Candrlic, T.M. “Factors Affecting Accuracy of Non-Metric Analytical 3-D Photogrammetry, Using PhotoModeler,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0451 1999
- Mills, D. Carty, G. “Semi-Automated Crush Determination Using Coded and Non-Coded Targets with Close-Range Photogrammetry,” http://www.PhotoModeler.com/applications/documents/MillsCodedTargetsCrush.pdf 2005
- Bartlett, W. Wright, W. Masory, O. Brach, R. et al. “Evaluating the Uncertainty in Various Measurement Tasks Common to Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0546 2002