This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Life Cycle Inventories of Conventional and Alternative Automobile Fuel/Propulsion Systems:Summary and Conclusions
Technical Paper
2000-01-1504
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
We compare the life cycle inventories of near–term fuel–propulsion technologies. We analyze fossil fuels (conventional and reformulated gasolines, low sulfur diesel, and compressed natural gas (CNG)), ethanol from biomass, and electricity, together with internal combustion engines (port and direct injection, spark and compression ignited) and electric vehicles (battery–powered, hybrid electric, and fuel cell). The fuel economy and emissions of conventional internal combustion engines powered by gasoline continue to improve. Unless emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHG) are stringently regulated or gasoline prices more than double, gasoline powered internal combustion engines will continue to dominate the light duty fleet. Two appealing alternative fuels are CNG and biomass ethanol. CNG cars have low emissions, including GHG and the fuel is less expensive than gasoline. Biomass ethanol can be renewable and have no net carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The improved fuel economy and lower emissions of hybrid and fuel cell vehicles do not justify their higher costs. We conclude that neither fuel availability nor environmental emissions need prevent personal transportation vehicles from dominating urban transportation over the next two decades.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Lave, L., MacLean, H., Lankey, R., Joshi, S. et al., "Life Cycle Inventories of Conventional and Alternative Automobile Fuel/Propulsion Systems:Summary and Conclusions," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1504, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-1504.Also In
SAE 2000 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Number: V109-6; Published: 2001-09-15
Number: V109-6; Published: 2001-09-15
References
- Brinkman, N General Motors Warren, MI 1999
- Transportation Energy Data Book 17th Davis, S. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies 1996
- U.S. Department of Energy Federal Alternative Motor Fuels Programs Fifth Annual Report to Congress Department of Transportation Technologies National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1996
- http://www.eiolca.net
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990–1997 Office of Policy Washington, D.C. 1999
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency “Evaluation of a Toyota Prius Hybrid System (THS),” August 1998
- Hanisch, C. “Powering Tomorrow's Cars,” ES&T News 458A 462A November 1 1999
- Hendrickson, C.T. Horvath, A. Joshi, S. Lave, L.B. Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life Cycle Assessment Environmental Science & Technology 184A 191A April 1998
- Joshi, S. Lave, L.B. MacLean, H. Lankey, R. “A Life Cycle Comparison of Alternative Transportation Fuels,” SAE Total Life Cycle Conference Detroit, MI 2000
- Lankey, R. McMichael, F.C. MacLean, H. Lave, L.B. Joshi, S. “Battery–Powered, Hybrid, and Fuel–Cell Cars: Toward a Life Cycle Inventory,” SAE Total Life Cycle Conference Detroit, MI 2000
- Lave, L.B. MacLean, H.L. “An Environmental Economic Evaluation of Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” Green Design Initiative Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 2000
- Lave, L.B. Joshi, S. MacLean, H.L. Horvath, A. Hendrickson, C.T. McMichael, F.C. Environmental Input–Output Life Cycle Analysis: A Summary of Results Including a Comparison with the SETAC Approach Proceedings of the 1998 SAE Total Life Cycle Conference Graz, Austria December 1998
- Lave, L.B. Russell, A. McMichael, F.C. Hendrickson, C.T. “Environmental Implications of Battery Powered Vehicles as a Transitional Technology: Ozone vs. Lead,” Environmental Science and Technology 1996
- Lave, L.B. Hendrickson, C. McMichael, F. “Environmental Implications of Electric Cars,” Science 268 992 5 1995
- Lave, L.B. Cobas, E. Hendrickson, C.T. McMichael, F.C. Using Input–Output Analysis to Estimate Economy–Wide Discharges Environmental Science & Technology 29 420A 426A September 1995
- Liss, W. Natural Gas Research Institute Chicago, IL 1998
- MacLean, H.L. Lave, L.B. Environmental Implications of Alternative–Fueled Automobiles: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Tradeoffs Environmental Science & Technology January 2000
- MacLean, H.L. Lave, L.B. “Addressing Vehicle Equivalency to Facilitate Meaningful Automobile Comparisons,” SAE Total Life Cycle Conference Detroit, MI 2000
- MacLean, H.L. Lave, L.B. Lankey, R. Joshi, S. A Life Cycle Comparison of Alternative Automobile Fuels Green Design Initiative Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 1999
- MacLean, H.L. Lave, L.B. A Life Cycle Model of an Automobile: Resource Use and Environmental Discharges in the Production and Use Phases Environmental Science & Technology 322A 330A July 1998
- MacLean, H.L. Life Cycle Models of Conventional and Alternative–Fueled Automobiles Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 1998
- Matthews, H.S. “The External Costs of Industrial Production and the Environmental Impact of the Consumer in the US Economy” Carnegie Mellon University January 1999
- McMichael, F.C. Hendrickson, C.T. “Battery Recycling,” IEEE Spectrum February 1998
- Robinson, G. State Farm Insurance Pittsburgh, PA 1998
- Sullivan, J.L. Williams, R.L. Yester, S. Cobas–Flores, E. Chubbs, S.T. Hentges, S.G. Pomper, S.D. Life Cycle Inventory of a Generic U.S. Family Sedan Overview and Results USCAR AMP Project SAE 982160
- Vachon, T. Let's Correct the Image of the Diesel and Let's Get Real About the Next 20 Years Proceedings of the 1997 Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction Workshop University of California San Diego. La Jolla, CA July 28 31 1997 207