This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Total Fuel Cycle Impacts of Advanced Vehicles
Technical Paper
1999-01-0322
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Recent advances in fuel-cell technology and low-emission, direct-injection spark-ignition and diesel engines for vehicles could significantly change the transportation vehicle power plant landscape in the next decade or so. This paper is a scoping study that compares total fuel cycle options for providing power to personal transport vehicles. The key question asked is, “How much of the energy from the fuel feedstock is available for motive power?” Emissions of selected criteria pollutants and greenhouse gases are qualitatively discussed. This analysis illustrates the differences among options; it is not intended to be exhaustive. Cases considered are hydrogen fuel from methane and from iso-octane in generic proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel-cell vehicles, methane and iso-octane in spark-ignition (SI) engine vehicles, and diesel fuel (from methane or petroleum) in direct-injection (DI) diesel engine vehicles. We also consider advanced hybrid technology to develop an upper bound for vehicle efficiency realizable using internal combustion engines (ICEs). Future-technology fuel-cell vehicles and future-technology hybrid ICE vehicles (particularly those with direct-injection engines) have similar projected ranges of efficiency. Differences, if any, will only become apparent after fuel-cell and advanced ICE vehicles are ready for market testing. The main challenge for fuel-cell vehicles is to improve the efficiency of hydrogen production (off-board and on-board). The main challenge for ICE hybrid vehicles is to meet stringent new emission standards while maintaining high efficiency. Both fuel-cell and ICE hybrid technologies require a reliable and efficient hybrid powertrain, and both would benefit from cleaner, lower-sulfur fuels, as well as advanced catalysts for improved fuel production and/or exhaust aftertreatment. The greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ranking approximately corresponds to the total fuel-cycle efficiency ranking. Fuel-cell vehicles are excellent candidates for carbon emissions reductions if methane is the preferred feedstock. The GHG benefits of petroleum feedstock for fuel-cell vehicles are less certain relative to advanced hybrid ICE vehicles. Emissions of criteria pollutants from fuel-cell vehicles are expected to be near zero, but upstream emissions of these fuel chains are significant and will not change vs. conventional engine technology. For policy decisions, low emissions of criteria pollutants from fuel-cell vehicles and their less certain GHG and fuel economy benefits (relative to direct-injection hybrid electric vehicles) must be weighed against their earlier state of development. Similarly, unless fuel processing, combustion, and aftertreatment technologies are much improved, the fuel economy and GHG emissions benefits of advanced internal-combustion engines may not be realized as a consequence of new, much tighter emission standards for nitrogen oxides and particulates.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Stodolsky, F., Gaines, L., Marshall, C., An, F. et al., "Total Fuel Cycle Impacts of Advanced Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0322, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-0322.Also In
References
- American Petroleum Institute Basic Petroleum Data Book-Petroleum Industry Statistics Vol. XVI No. 1 American Petroleum Institute Washington, D.C. Aug. 1996
- Transportation Energy Data Book Edition 17 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Aug. 1997
- “Spark-Ignition Engines Expected to Dominate HEV Market,” New Fuels & Vehicles Report 19 15 13 New Fuels & Vehicles Report Washington, D.C. July 17 1998
- Bagot, N. “New Cars. New Business?” Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technology '97 UK & International Press Surrey, U.K. 1997
- U.S. News & World Report May 11 1998 47
- Bagot, N. “Power by Daimler Benz Ballard,” Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technology '97 UK & International Press Surrey, U.K. 1997
- “Environmentalists, Automakers Eye Fuel-Cells Rather Than Diesel HEV R&D,” New Fuels & Vehicles Report 19 15 1 New Fuels & Vehicles Report Washington, D.C. July 17 1998
- National Research Council “Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles, Fourth Report,” Transportation Research Board, National Research Council National Academy Press Washington, D.C. 1998
- Bagot, N. “There's still a long way to go,” Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technology '97 UK & International Press Surrey, U.K. 1997
- Bagot, N. “Altra ego,” Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technology '97 UK & International Press Surrey, U.K. 1997
- DeCicco, J. Ross M. “Improving Automotive Efficiency,” Scientific American Dec. 1994
- Gaines, L. Stodolsky F. “Lifecycle Analysis for Automobiles: Uses and Limitations,” SAE paper 971092 SAE 1997 Transactions, Journal of Materials & Manufacturing 106 913 918 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Warrendale, Pa. 1998
- Stodolsky, F. et al. “Life-Cycle Energy Savings Potential from Aluminum-Intensive Vehicles,” SAE paper no. 951837 Society of Automotive Engineers Total Life Cycle Conference and Exhibition Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Pa. 1995
- Gaines, L. Stodolsky F. Cuenca R. “Lifecycle Analysis for Heavy Vehicles,” AWMA paper no. 98-WP61B.03 91 st Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association San Diego, Calif. June 1998
- Wang, M.Q. Gaines L. Cuenca R. “Modeling the Vehicle Cycle Impacts of Hybrid Vehicles 90 th Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association Toronto, Ont., Canada June 1997
- Wang, M.Q. “Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Alternative-Fueled Vehicles: Near-Term vs. Long-Term Technology Options,” Eighth Global Warming International Conference Columbia University May 25-28 1997 New York, N.Y. 1997
- Wang, M.Q. G reenhouse G ases, R egulated E missions, and E nergy Use in T ransportation (GREET) Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Ill. 1998
- Wang, M.Q. “Fuel-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts of Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicle Technologies,” 1999 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington, D.C. Jan. 10-14 1999
- Thomas, C.E. et al. “Societal Impacts of Fuel Options for Fuel Cell Vehicles,” SAE paper no. 982496 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Pa. 1998
- Kumar, R. et al. “Design, Integration, and Trade-Off Analyses of Gasoline-Fueled Polymer Electrolyte Fuel-Cell Systems for Transportation,” 1998 Fuel-Cell Seminar Palm Springs, Calif. Nov. 16-19 1998
- An, F. Barth M. “Critical Issues in Quantifying Hybrid Electric Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Consumption,” Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper 981902 1998
- An, F. Barth M. Scora G. “Impacts of Diverse Driving Cycles on Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicle Performance,” SAE Special Publication (SP-1284) on Electric/Hybrid Vehicles: Alternative Powerplants, Energy Management, and Battery Technology, SAE Technical Paper 972646 1997
- An, F. Ross M. “A Model of Fuel Economy and Driving Patterns,” SAE Transactions on Future Fuel and Emission Systems 63 79 SAE Technical Paper 930328 1993
- Gray, P.G. Frost J.C. “Impact of Catalysis on Clean Energy in Road Transportation,” Energy & Fuels 12 1121 29 1998
- Office of Advanced Automotive Technologies R&D Plan U.S. Department of Energy Report DOE/ORO/2065 Washington, D.C. March 1998
- U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment Advanced Automotive Technology: Visions of a Super-Efficient Family Car Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office Sept. 1995
- Choi, G.N. et al. “Design/Economics of a Natural Gas Based Fischer-Tropsch Plant,” American Institute of Chemical Engineers Spring National Meeting Houston, Texas March 9-13 1997
- Wilson, D.E. “The Design of a Low Specific Fuel Consumption Turbocompound Engine,” SAE technical paper no. 860072 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Pa. 1986
- “Fuel-Cell Introduction Should Be Cautiously Considered,” New Fuels & Vehicles Report 19 20 12 13 New Fuels & Vehicles Report Washington, D.C. Sept. 25 1998
- “Introduction,” Department of Energy Fuel-Cells for Transportation FY 1997 National Laboratory Annual Report Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, N.M. 1998
- “CARB Proposed Changes to Vehicle Emission Standards,” New Fuels & Vehicles Report 19 13 19 New Fuels & Vehicles Report Washington, D.C. July 3 1998
- Resolution 98-35 State of California Air Resources Board August 27 1998
- Inside EPA's Mobile Source Report March 26 1998 8 9