Your Destination for Mobility Engineering Resources

This specification covers a magnesium alloy in the form of die forgings 3 inches (76 mm) and under in nominal thickness at time of heat treatment, hand forgings 6 inches (152 mm) and under in nominal thickness, and forging stock of any size (see 8.5).
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
This specification covers a corrosion-resistant steel in the form of sheet, strip, and plate.
AMS F Corrosion and Heat Resistant Alloys Committee
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
This specification covers a corrosion- and heat-resistant steel in the form of forgings and forging stock.
AMS F Corrosion and Heat Resistant Alloys Committee
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
This standard establishes definitions, guidelines, and requirements governing materials (e.g., alloy and heat-treat condition) allowed for use in chemical process test specimens when requirements call for a generic class of alloy.
AMS B Finishes Processes and Fluids Committee
The scope of this SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) is to explain the functions of the various sections of the specifications, why some of the terms in AMS specifications are used, and how the specification system works. Starting with Section 4 of this document, the topics are presented in the order they usually appear in AMS specifications.
Aerospace Materials Systems Group
This document describes guidelines, methods, and tools used to perform the ongoing safety assessment process for transport airplanes in commercial service (hereafter termed “airplane”). The process described herein is intended to support an overall management of safety. It is associated with showing compliance to regulations and also establishing and meeting internal company safety standards. The methods identify a systematic means, but not the only means, to assess ongoing safety. While economic decision-making is an integral part of the safety management process, this document addresses only the ongoing safety assessment process. To put it succinctly, this document addresses the “Is it safe?” part of safety management; it does not address the “How much does it cost?” part of safety management. This document also does not address any specific organizational structures for accomplishing the safety assessment process. While the nature of the organizational structure is significant to the quality of a safety program, this document focuses on the functions to be accomplished and does not attempt to define what the structure should be. The intent is to leave the greatest amount of flexibility to the organizations that use this document.
S-18C Ongoing Safety Assessment Committee
The main purpose of this SAE Recommended Practice is to verify that vehicles are capable of communicating a minimum subset of information in accordance with the diagnostic test services specified in SAE J1979, or the equivalent document ISO 15031-5. Any software meeting these specifications will utilize the vehicle interface that is defined in SAE J2534. SAE J1699-3 tests shall be run using an SAE J2534-1 (API Version 04.04) Interface. However, the use of an SAE J2534-2 (API Version 04.04) Interface shall be permitted if the following conditions are met: The number of 29-bit ISO 15765 OBD ECUs exceeds the capability of the SAE J2534-1 Interface. The SAE J2534-2 Interface meets or exceeds all of the SAE J2534-1 requirements and also supports the SAE J2534-2 feature “Mixed Format Frames on a CAN Network.”
Vehicle E E System Diagnostic Standards Committee